Fort Worth Apartment Review Guide
Menu

Amelia Parc II

Updated 2026-07-24 · 2,262 reviewed · 497 listed · Scored from 78 Google reviews · How we rank ›

3.8(78) 62 low data composite score See reviews on Google ✓ Google-verified
Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Amelia Parc II
Services
Luxury Apartments, Senior & 55+ Living
Reviews
78

The real story

Staff earn consistent praise for friendliness and knowledge, and some residents report professional maintenance response. However, reviews frequently cite ignored maintenance requests, dirty common areas, unchecked pet problems, and residents feeling pressured to pay higher fees on fixed incomes.

Based on limited recent reviews, so treat this as low-confidence.

Praised for
  • knowledgeable and friendly staff
  • professional maintenance crew
  • pleasant gated community
  • clean grounds
Watch-outs
  • maintenance delays and incomplete work
  • unclean common areas and units
  • poor pet control enforcement
  • management overcharging residents
  • privacy concerns from surveillance
responsive-managementslow-maintenancefriendly-staffclean-facilitiespest-problemsoverpriced-fees
Best for: seniors seeking a social community with strong staff engagement and active amenities
Think twice if: budget-conscious seniors; maintenance responsiveness and cleanliness standards vary significantly

Where it delivers

  • attentive leasing staff
  • gated community
  • on-site amenities

What to ask before signing

  • Staff named Daniella, Rosalyn, Carmen, Yosheka, and Tanya praised for leasing assistance and friendliness
  • Maintenance crew noted as professional and prompt by some residents, but delayed response complaints also filed
  • Pet-friendly policy listed but enforcement reportedly lacking
  • Residents on fixed income report pressure to accept rent increases or month-to-month terms

How residents rate the community

Senior & 55+ Living
Staff expertise and community warmth praised, but maintenance delays and cleanliness complaints undermine experience
Pet-Friendly Apartments
Pet-friendly housing listed but residents report lack of enforcement of pet control policies

Measured against the market

  • Rated 3.8 against a 3.97 average across the 327 luxury apartments businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 33% of the businesses in this directory.

How we got this number

How We Rank
Star rating 22
Review volume 82
Review recency 100
Review sentiment 48
Profile completeness 100
Verification 30

Ratings pulled apart

5
36
4
18
3
10
2
4
1
10

Get in touch

Address
5301 Collett Little Rd, Fort Worth, TX 76119

Last verified 2026-07-24

Office hours

Monday
08:30-17:30
Tuesday
08:30-17:30
Wednesday
08:30-17:30
Thursday
08:30-17:30
Friday
08:30-17:30
Saturday
10:00-15:00
Sunday
Closed

As listed on Google.

From the property's site

Services listed
Senior living apartmentsSwimming poolCommunity roomDining areaLibraryTennis courtGeneral storeBeauty shop

As published by the business on its own website; not independently verified.

Enquire about Amelia Parc II

Your enquiry goes to the Fort Worth Apartment Review Guide team, who will pass it to Amelia Parc II. We only share your details with providers relevant to your request.

Similar apartment complexes nearby

Amelia Parc I
54

Amelia Parc I

3.4(24)✓ Google-verified

Amelia Parc I draws strong reactions from residents. Five-star reviewers praise the quiet setting and specific staff members like Lauren and Paula's recent management team, calling it a caring community. The majority of lower ratings cite maintenance neglect, bug infestations, dirty hallways, and rude staff. Communication failures-unanswered calls, ignored messages, unresponsive management-recur across multiple reviews. Residents report amenities advertised on the website do not match reality, and move-in fees contain hidden charges. The polarization reflects inconsistent operations, with some praising current leadership while others describe feeling disrespected and underserved. Many reviewers say maintenance requests go unaddressed for weeks or months. Delivery access is limited by a key-card system. Overall, the experience depends heavily on which management team is in place and when you move in; recent changes have affected morale.

Senior & 55+ Living
The Kimberly Apartments
64

The Kimberly Apartments

3.8(236)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Kimberly draws strong loyalty from residents who praise staff like Stephanie, Karina, and maintenance crew Noe and Adan for quick, attentive service. However, a vocal minority report roach and spider infestations, slow repairs despite paid valet trash, outdated flooring and appliances that contradict online images, and reception delays that frustrated prospective tenants. CAF Management's recent takeover appears to have improved office operations for some, though pest control and move-in transparency remain pain points. Word-of-mouth varies sharply based on which staff member handles your request and whether you prioritise budget over finish quality. Affordability at $865–$1,190/month attracts budget-conscious renters, but several report the complex's cheap finishes and inadequate pest management undercut the perceived value. Long-time residents (since 2016) stay put; newer tenants weigh cost against disappointment. First-apartment renters often discover they need to tour in person rather than trust online videos. Valet trash, dog parks, and fitness centres appeal on paper, but residents dispute the valet trash's actual delivery and upkeep of advertised amenities.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Villas of Forest Hill
64 low data

Villas of Forest Hill

4.1(77)

Most residents praise the quiet, peaceful setting and the attentive management team, especially staff like Carla and Lupe. Maintenance issues can drag on for weeks, and some reviewers say the 55-plus age requirement is not consistently enforced.

Senior & 55+ Living

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-07-24