Find an apartment in furnished & corporate housing in Arlington, TX
Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.
10 businesses, scored on recent reviews. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is furnished & corporate housing, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.
Arbor Oaks is a popular student housing option near UT Arlington offering furnished or unfurnished units at prices lower than comparable apartments in the area. Most reviewers praise cleanliness and proximity to campus, though one resident raised serious concerns about RA access to units and lack of privacy.
Strong staff loyalty dominates positive reviews: Sam, Tami, and Jayme consistently earn praise for attentive service during move-in and problem-solving. Yet persistent complaints center on A/C malfunctions, cockroach infestations, and slow or incomplete repairs despite management goodwill. One tenant reported unit damage requiring a move with added fees; another waited weeks for fixes on a faulty air conditioning system. The gap between staff praise and maintenance failures suggests strong management intent but operational strain. Website claims off-campus proximity to UT Arlington, furnished units, in-unit laundry, and resort amenities. Complaints suggest advertised renovations do not always match unit condition, and pest issues recur despite staff effort.
The Arlie draws praise for its tour experience and location near UT Arlington, with tour guides like Musab and Genesis regularly highlighted and maintenance workers responding quickly to service requests. Yet long-term residents report a steep drop in satisfaction: roaches recur despite treatment, management refuses to fix issues or investigate resident complaints, hallways stay littered for weeks, parking gate and reserved spots don't work reliably, damage charges appear even with photo proof, and utilities post months late. Staff handling tours charm visitors; those staying months or years describe feeling dismissed. The furnished apartments and amenities (pool, dog park, fitness center) remain attractive on paper, but shared spaces deteriorate and the office applies charges broadly to entire units regardless of individual fault. A pattern emerges of one-time discounts ($200-350 off) masking high base rent for what residents call substandard upkeep. Maintenance teams earn consistent praise for effort; management's rigid, "emotionless" replies to resident concerns stand in sharp contrast.
Liv+ works well for short-term UTA students willing to overlook maintenance. Furnished units, in-unit washer dryer, and same-day maintenance requests draw praise. Cassandra and her team stand out for genuine care. But pest problems plague the property despite weekly treatment, move-out fees feel inflated, hallways stay dirty, and management rarely follows through on complaints or disputes. The real issue: showroom tours hide the condition of occupied areas. Roaches greet new arrivals, elevators break for weeks, and security feels slack. Utility billing through Conservice runs high. For non-UTA residents or anyone seeking a clean, quiet community, this place falls short of its luxury label.
Reviewers describe a split experience tied partly to recent management changes. Some praise Hayden's leasing responsiveness and note that Clayton and Mackenzie have improved maintenance turnaround and communication. Others, mostly students, report a pattern of building-wide roach problems management refused to treat, slow or failed repairs (AC in summer heat, dishwasher for months), lost packages, broken security gates, and deposit charges arriving months after move-out. Current residents with responsive staff contact report quick fixes; longer-term residents and those unable to reach management cite frustration and feeling ignored. Location near UT Arlington and furnished options draw renters despite the complaints. The gap between positive reviews citing staff by name and negative reviews about institutional failures suggests experience depends heavily on which manager and team members a tenant encounters, and which stage of the building's maintenance cycle they occupy.
Find an apartment in furnished & corporate housing in Arlington, TX
Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.
Buffalo at Arlington draws strong praise for maintenance staff responsiveness and fresh renovations, with many students highlighting the proximity to UT Arlington and useful on-site amenities. However, the complex struggles with operational consistency: some residents report maintenance requests left unresolved while others are told they're complete, move-ins were chaotic with hours-long delays, and common hallways showed visible neglect and dirt buildup. Staff performance varies by department. Leasing team members like Anais, Jacob, Xen, and DJ earn repeated recognition for friendliness and efficiency. Maintenance standout Femi resolves issues promptly. Yet billing remains opaque, with residents citing unexpected extra charges, and management communication appears fragmented between the property and Cardinal Group oversight.
Tour staff, particularly Leo, earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism during the leasing process. Once residents move in, experience fractures sharply: maintenance responds within two days, but management communication fails, packages disappear, roaches infest units despite cleaning efforts, fire alarms trigger repeatedly at night, and rules apply unevenly across the complex. Residents report unexplained repair charges stacked monthly, A/C withheld when temperatures reach 87 degrees, and little accountability when units suffer water damage or residents have roommate conflicts. The property itself shows visible trash, vandalism in the garage, and stairwell filth. Management does not engage after the lease is signed.
Most residents describe serious problems: pervasive roaches requiring multiple pest control calls, frequent water and internet outages, and slow or inadequate maintenance responses. A few graduate students and engaged residents found the location convenient and some staff helpful, but the overwhelming majority report the place is outdated, expensive for the condition, and poorly managed. Rent increases without corresponding improvements have compounded frustration. The business lists 24/7 support and UTAPD security, yet reviewers consistently say office staff ignore requests, ignore emails, and delay action on emergencies like ceiling leaks and pest infestations. Even when maintenance shows up, repairs are temporary; one resident described bathtub epoxy failing within a week, only to repeat the cycle. Move-in transparency and deposit handling are additional red flags.
Centennial has a 3.3-star rating split sharply between five-star and one/two-star reviews, with limited detail available. Complaints focus on slow or absent maintenance response, water damage, mold, and front desk staff negligence. One reviewer noted prices feel prohibitive.
Evidence is limited to one negative review from two years ago. That reviewer praised maintenance speed but criticized the apartment layout, noting the small living room, disproportionately large bedroom, and kitchen cabinets mounted too high to reach easily.
Head over to our enquiry page and tell us what you need.
Get in touchLast updated 2026-09-23
