Luxury Apartments in Arlington, TX

All luxury apartments in Arlington, TX, ranked by score and relevance

We found 47 businesses offering luxury apartments in Arlington, TX; 46 met the criteria for the scored directory. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is luxury apartments, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.

#1

84

Bardin Oaks Apartments

★4.5(163)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Melanie Ward and the leasing team leave a strong impression, greeting prospects warmly, walking them through options patiently, and making the application process smooth. Staff like Katarina and Saherra carry that care into resident life, maintenance fixes issues quickly, and the property feels clean and spacious for the price. Community events like Juneteenth draw families back year after year. Parking is generous and the neighborhood quiet. Long-term residents describe feeling genuinely heard by management, which handles both tours and move-in logistics with visible personal investment.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#2

84

Villa Del Mar Apartments

★4.5(318)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Most residents stay for years and praise the maintenance crews for same-day responses and attentive upkeep. Staff members Savannah, Karina, Belle, Jessy, and the maintenance team Tom and Jeremy earn repeated mention for going beyond basics: the leasing experience feels personal, ground maintenance stays immaculate, and problems get flagged to residents immediately by text and email. One resident reported being asked to leave the pool area without explanation. The overwhelming consistency of five-star reviews points to strong day-to-day operations, though the complex is not immune to interpersonal friction. Tenures of 9 to 24 years suggest residents vote with their lease renewals.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#3

79

Autumnwood

★4.3(549)·✓ Google-verified

Most residents speak highly of Autumnwood, especially praising Maria and the maintenance crew for responsiveness and problem-solving. Grounds are clean and quiet, with fast repair service. Two sour visits hint at occasional front desk inconsistency, and one resident received a no-smoking violation they dispute.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#4

75

Arlington Hills Apartments & Townhomes

★4.2(351)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Staff like Tina, Julio, and Cesar earn consistent five-star praise for going above and beyond; many residents highlight responsive maintenance and friendly service. Yet two recent reviews paint a sharply different picture: one tenant battled repeated water leaks and insect problems despite multiple maintenance visits, while another faced severe parking shortages and received a unit with rust, dirty dishwasher, and other unaddressed issues at move-in. The gap between best and worst experiences suggests inconsistent execution. Amenities include a dog park, fitness center, pool, and outdoor kitchen. Pricing ranges from $1,467 to $2,007 per month for two-bedroom units. The majority of reviews celebrate the community and staff, but those with facility or maintenance complaints describe prolonged frustration and feeling ignored despite repeated requests.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#5

74

Lenox Cooper

★4.5(199)·✓ Google-verified

Lenox Cooper draws consistent praise for its leasing team, particularly staff members Paige and Stephanie who make the tour and move-in process smooth and welcoming. Maintenance requests resolve quickly. However, residents report severe operational problems that undercut the modern finishes: roaches require weekly extermination requests in some units, hallways and grounds go uncleaned despite complaints, management (especially the property manager) acts dismissive or hostile when tenants raise issues or ask for clarity on fees, and towing practices trap vehicles with little warning or recourse. The hidden-fee structure cuts deep. Beyond quoted rent, residents face sewer charges, payment processing fees, parking fees for both residents and guests, and move-out charges of $1,600 even after light use. One resident's towing bill alone reached $1,700 over the lease term. Security is compromised by a gate left open or propped, leading to unauthorized pool use and car break-ins. Current residents feel trapped by a $6,000+ lease-break penalty.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

Find an apartment in luxury apartments in Arlington, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info

#6

78

Center Place

★4.4(197)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Center Place earned loyalty from residents largely through two standout managers, Luis and Angelica, whose professionalism, patience, and genuine care shaped the experience. Many felt heard and valued. However, this leadership's recent departure has left uncertainty. Maintenance lapses (cracked walls, poor grounds cleanup) and occasional office communication gaps undercut the warm community feel. Pet owners and families found the dog park and pool appealing. Pricing ranges from $1,180 for a one-bedroom to $1,920 for larger layouts. The property sits 6 minutes from UT Arlington, drawing student tenants. Reviews show strong affection for staff quality but hint at sustainability concerns if leadership culture doesn't hold.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#7

72

One Rangers Way

★4.7(67)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Most residents praise the building's luxury finishes, cleanliness, and staff warmth, particularly General Manager Karina and front desk team members Scott, Sincere, Kashes, Nick, and Gladys. However, multiple recent reviews describe Karina as unprofessional, petty, and selectively hostile toward certain residents, issuing questionable lease violations and failing to respond to complaints. Move-out billing has also frustrated residents who were not clearly informed of month-to-month fees and charges.

Luxury Apartments

View profile

#8

73

The Gin Mill

★4.2(142)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Staff members Austin, Diana, and Christy earn consistent praise for going above and beyond with residents; the buildings and grounds are generally well-maintained and residents describe feeling safe in a quiet, friendly community. However, some residents report significant problems: unreliable internet service, delayed response to maintenance requests including water damage and mold, overflowing trash areas, and limited parking. Management responsiveness appears inconsistent across different time periods.

Luxury Apartments

View profile

#9

69 low data

Arbor Oaks

★4.5(126)

Arbor Oaks is a popular student housing option near UT Arlington offering furnished or unfurnished units at prices lower than comparable apartments in the area. Most reviewers praise cleanliness and proximity to campus, though one resident raised serious concerns about RA access to units and lack of privacy.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing

View profile

#10

76

The Paisley at Arlington Apartments

★4.2(267)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Most residents praise the maintenance crew (Greg and Anthony especially) for fast, professional repairs and going above and beyond. Management staff like Jennifer and Lauren earn consistent compliments for making move-ins smooth and staying patient. The gated grounds feel safe and spacious, with a well-maintained pool closed weekly for cleaning, a centered playground, and weekly barbecue pavilion amenities. A handful of complaints surface: one newer staff member drew criticism for poor communication, one long-term resident cited broken promises around payment deadlines and unexpected charges, and some note staff turnover. But the recent shift toward stronger service and maintenance responsiveness comes through clearly in newer reviews.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#11

69

The Jackson at Viridian Apartments

★4.1(365)·✓ Google-verified

Lesley, Burgundy, and Darius earn consistent praise for patience and warmth during leasing, and the property draws residents with its pool, gym, and lake-view trails. But roach infestations, rotting-trash smells in hallways, broken fitness equipment, and surprise move-out invoices undercut the luxury positioning, leaving long-term residents frustrated that the building does not match its price or promise. Management remains unresponsive on serious issues: pest control charges without visible treatment, soundproofing gaps, gates that fail repeatedly, and a move-out process that penalizes normal wear and tear. Some prospective visitors report being ignored at the leasing desk; others encounter only friendly tours.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#12

70

Ridgewood Preserve Apartment Homes

★4.1(247)·✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Tamika, Lindsay, and Angela earn consistent five-star praise for patience and going the extra mile with approvals. The grounds, particularly the pool and lobby, appeal to visitors. However, a troubling streak of one- and two-star reviews details unresolved maintenance-mold painted over rather than fixed, A/C outages lasting months, nails through floors left untended for quarters, and move-in apartments delivered filthy and non-functional. Noise complaints about neighbors go ignored by management.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#13

69

404 Border Apartments

★4.1(447)·✓ Google-verified

Tenants who stayed report strong connections to the property and consistently praise location, cleanliness, and staff like Christie, Adriana, and Cristy for quick responses. However, multiple reviewers describe severe pest problems, unanswered maintenance requests spanning months, aggressive staff behavior, and discriminatory conduct during leasing. The roach complaints are specific and detailed, with tenants noting they hired outside pest control and found visible infestation upon move-in. Some reviewers felt disrespected or belittled; one reported racial bias. The divide suggests vastly different experiences depending on when tenants moved in or which staff member they dealt with. Recent positive reviewers focus on location, design, and responsive management. Older one-star reviews detail systemic failures: an eight-month broken dishwasher, managers blaming tenants for pest issues, and a blonde manager described as rude and dismissive. Financial complaints center on unreasonable move-out charges (a $1,500 fee plus retained deposit for carpet damage) and alleged application fees. The pattern hints at either resolved problems or inconsistent standards between units and management shifts.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing

View profile

#14

65

The Arlie

★3.9(390)·✓ Google-verified

The Arlie draws praise for its tour experience and location near UT Arlington, with tour guides like Musab and Genesis regularly highlighted and maintenance workers responding quickly to service requests. Yet long-term residents report a steep drop in satisfaction: roaches recur despite treatment, management refuses to fix issues or investigate resident complaints, hallways stay littered for weeks, parking gate and reserved spots don't work reliably, damage charges appear even with photo proof, and utilities post months late. Staff handling tours charm visitors; those staying months or years describe feeling dismissed. The furnished apartments and amenities (pool, dog park, fitness center) remain attractive on paper, but shared spaces deteriorate and the office applies charges broadly to entire units regardless of individual fault. A pattern emerges of one-time discounts ($200-350 off) masking high base rent for what residents call substandard upkeep. Maintenance teams earn consistent praise for effort; management's rigid, "emotionless" replies to resident concerns stand in sharp contrast.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#15

68

Zenith

★4.0(245)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Zenith offers modern apartments with solid amenities and a staff that builds community through regular social events. The team, particularly staff members like Anthony and the maintenance crew, handles requests promptly and makes residents feel welcome. However, the parking situation is extremely problematic: only 3-4 spaces serve 90+ residents, vehicles get towed without warning, and guests face steep fees or removal. Add in complaints about noise transfer, inconsistent cleanliness in hallways, slow resolution on major issues like broken AC, and unresponsive management by phone, and the experience splits sharply between those valuing the community feel and those frustrated by basic infrastructure failures. Long-term residents report a noticeable decline since staff turnover.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#16

67

Huntington Meadows Apartments

★4.1(448)·✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff shine during move-in, and grounds stay manicured, but maintenance falls apart once you occupy a unit. Reviewers report broken AC units left unfixed for weeks, roaches spreading despite repeated fumigation, floors glued instead of replaced, and holes in emergency response. The rating split (72% five-star, 22% one/two-star) reflects a stark divide: tours and paperwork are smooth; living there is a grind. Management presence is thin, with recent vacant manager roles and office coverage by skeleton crews. Tenants who needed urgent help report being ignored. Repair requests accumulate into months of neglect while rent stays due on the first. Several residents mention paying high prices but receiving low-quality service and hidden fees.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#17

66

Wimbledon Oaks

★4.0(325)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Wimbledon Oaks has a strong location in Southwest Arlington but faces persistent service issues under current management. Residents report chronic AC breakdowns, slow or ignored maintenance requests, recurring hot water failures, and rising fees. When maintenance staff do respond, they often deliver quality work, but getting them to show up remains a constant struggle. New management has drawn particular criticism for unresponsiveness and lack of accountability.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#18

70

Southpoint Villas

★4.1(298)·✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the leasing and maintenance staff, particularly Leon and Chris, for responsiveness and genuine care. Move-in processes run smoothly and maintenance requests close quickly. One detailed complaint flags the Assistant Manager for being dismissive during resident concerns, discussing sensitive information with others, and failing to follow up on promises, raising questions about management professionalism and confidentiality standards. Property upkeep and grounds draw consistent compliments. Amenities function as advertised, and the community feels clean and well-maintained. Staff interactions are generally warm, though the management concern points to inconsistent customer service culture where frontline staff excel but oversight may be lacking.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#19

63

Mateo Apartment Homes

★3.7(338)·✓ Google-verified

New management has earned strong praise for efficiency during move-ins and attentiveness from office staff like Kristine, Dahlia, and Vanessa. Residents who have experienced the recent turnaround report visible property improvements and swift maintenance responses. However, significant infrastructure issues undermine this progress: persistent roach problems, months-long pool closures despite paid amenities, overflowing dumpsters, and unrepaired maintenance items (like a broken-into unit left open for weeks) create frustration. Many also report difficulty reaching management by phone or email, and disputes over fees and rent increases. The complex serves long-term residents alongside recent arrivals, creating a divided experience.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#20

67

The Heights Apartments and Townhomes

★3.9(300)·✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, particularly Alex and Alyssa, earn consistent praise for thorough tours and warm customer service. The property itself attracts five-star reviews for cleanliness, maintenance speed, and a safe, tree-lined setting near shopping and services. However, a recent one-star review alleges year-long unresolved water damage, pest infestations, and aggressive move-out billing practices with charges sent to collection without a formal invoice. Current residents celebrate the community; departing tenants report feeling trapped by undisclosed fees and management evasion.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

View profile

#21

66

Bardin Greene

★3.9(192)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Most residents praise the leasing staff, especially Andrea and Robyn, for quick turnarounds and genuine care. The grounds stay clean and maintenance typically responds same-day. However, several tenants report serious problems: one spent a month without AC in Texas heat, another faced mold and roaches that made the unit unlivable, and a third disputes being locked out and overcharged. These conflicts suggest maintenance issues can drag on without proactive management communication, and deposit practices appear opaque. Current residents tend to stay long-term and recommend the community, citing affordability and a safe, quiet atmosphere. Yet newer and departing tenants flag alarming lapses: maintenance workers entering without notice, ceiling damage left open for weeks, and surprise utility fees after move-out. The divide between leasing experience and occupancy reality is the core tension here.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#22

66

Sterling Crest Apartments

★3.9(167)·✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Sabrina and Melanie earn consistent praise for answering questions thoroughly and making move-in stress-free. After occupancy, however, multiple tenants report deposits withheld 10-12 months past the 30-day Texas law requirement, unresponsive management emails, and referrals to collections for disputed amounts. Onsite laundry machines are also reportedly out of service and unmaintained. The schism is sharp: five-star reviews cluster around leasing interactions, while one-star reviews chronicle ongoing disputes with ownership (ValveCorp Group). Those who moved out more than a year ago describe prolonged non-communication and cite being sent to collections despite management admitting owed amounts. Current residents praising the community are distinguishable from those in post-move disputes.

Luxury Apartments

View profile

#23

62

Mission at Johnson Creek

★3.9(39)·✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents love the quiet, well-kept townhomes and the maintenance team's quick fixes, with leasing staff earning specific praise for personalised service. Office management becomes unreliable after move-in: callers report locked doors, missed appointments, and ignored deposit refund requests, while the asking rent of $1,800 for 600 sq ft units troubles some renters compared to nearby options.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

Find an apartment in luxury apartments in Arlington, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info

#24

66

Midtown Urban

★4.0(212)·✓ Google-verified

Strong staff loyalty dominates positive reviews: Sam, Tami, and Jayme consistently earn praise for attentive service during move-in and problem-solving. Yet persistent complaints center on A/C malfunctions, cockroach infestations, and slow or incomplete repairs despite management goodwill. One tenant reported unit damage requiring a move with added fees; another waited weeks for fixes on a faulty air conditioning system. The gap between staff praise and maintenance failures suggests strong management intent but operational strain. Website claims off-campus proximity to UT Arlington, furnished units, in-unit laundry, and resort amenities. Complaints suggest advertised renovations do not always match unit condition, and pest issues recur despite staff effort.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing

View profile

#25

67

The Orchards at Arlington Highlands

★4.3(66)·✓ Google-verified

Many residents praise the attractive grounds, welcoming community feel, and active social calendar. Staff like Marcel, Juanita, and Carlos are named for friendliness. However, persistent complaints centre on slow maintenance (water damage, mold, broken elevators, pool closed for months), staff turnover, and serious concerns about management's response to discrimination allegations and front-desk lapses. The gap between posted amenities and actual upkeep is significant.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

View profile

#26

66

Seleno at Harris Road 55+ Apartments

★3.9(50)·✓ Google-verified

Most residents report a clean, secure complex with responsive maintenance and welcoming staff, particularly highlighting managers Stephanie and Keke. Some prospective tenants have experienced understaffed office visits and long waitlists; inoperable security gates and occasional repair delays also surface as concerns.

Senior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

View profile

#27

59

Hudson Apartments

★3.4(931)·✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, particularly Cheyenne and Jasmine, earn consistent praise for professionalism and hands-on care during move-in. The complex location appeals to residents needing proximity to amenities. However, maintenance failures dominate complaints: AC outages lasting 12+ hours in summer heat, water shutoffs, appliance breakdowns, and mold remediated by spray paint rather than proper repair. Roach and pest infestations recur despite resident requests. Residents report the office rarely answers phones, missed requests go unlogged, and repairs marked "completed" without work performed. Safety concerns include high police activity (residents document 23 police vehicles in a week, armed response, gunshot incidents), abandoned trash attracting wildlife, and broken gate security. Thin walls transmit neighbor noise throughout units.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#28

59

Pavilion

★3.3(230)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Long-term residents praise maintenance responsiveness and a handful of staff members, but newer arrivals report serious problems: roach infestations, mold, water leaks, and slow resolutions. Towing practices draw complaint, and some staff interactions are dismissive. Staff quality is highly inconsistent; Ms. Lili and the maintenance team earn loyal praise, while others receive sharp criticism for unprofessional conduct.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#29

59

Residence on Lamar

★2.9(227)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Recent management changes have brought real improvement: staff like Trisha, Patricia, and Maria now handle leasing quickly and professionally, with Spanish support available. Maintenance response times have improved noticeably for many residents. However, serious issues persist for others: pest infestations go unresolved, water leaks take over a week to address, pools sit non-functional for months, and move-out disputes over deposits and pre-existing damage leave tenants frustrated. The gap between what the complex charges and what it delivers remains the core complaint. Location near AT&T Stadium and shopping attracts residents, but promises of amenities and services still don't consistently match the rental price. Experiences vary sharply: newer residents under the current management team report satisfaction, while others describe a maintenance backlog and management unwilling to own up to building problems.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#30

62

Heather Glen Townhomes

★3.7(175)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Staff warmth at the leasing office masks systemic failures once residents move in. Reviewers consistently praise individual employees like Maria, Victoria, and Kathy for genuine customer service, yet the same people highlight a sharp drop in attention post-lease. Maintenance requests languish for weeks or close mysteriously without action. Roach problems persist despite repeated complaints, and the business refuses heat treatments residents say would solve them. One tenant waited over a month for a promised refund after finding an infested unit on move-in day. The AC failures during 102-degree heat and the dishonesty about repair timelines suggest management prioritizes cost over resident safety. Air conditioning breakdowns lasting six weeks, bathrooms left un-repaired for a month, and a documented cockroach infestation that management downplays are the core issues. Residents report leasing staff promise fixes before move-in but then encounter unresponsive management afterward. A few maintenance staff members (Marquis, Victoria in maintenance) earned specific praise for communication, but they appear exceptions to a slower, less accountable system. The price, described as "expensive" by one long-term tenant, does not match the upkeep or urgency residents expect.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#31

63

Liv+ Arlington

★3.8(636)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Liv+ works well for short-term UTA students willing to overlook maintenance. Furnished units, in-unit washer dryer, and same-day maintenance requests draw praise. Cassandra and her team stand out for genuine care. But pest problems plague the property despite weekly treatment, move-out fees feel inflated, hallways stay dirty, and management rarely follows through on complaints or disputes. The real issue: showroom tours hide the condition of occupied areas. Roaches greet new arrivals, elevators break for weeks, and security feels slack. Utility billing through Conservice runs high. For non-UTA residents or anyone seeking a clean, quiet community, this place falls short of its luxury label.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

View profile

#32

61

Rise West Arlington

★3.9(225)·✓ Google-verified

Living at Rise West Arlington deteriorates quickly after move-in. AC failures lasting weeks without compensation, paid monthly pest control that never arrives, and work orders marked complete though nothing gets fixed plague residents. Office staff rotate constantly, ignore emails, and handle disputes poorly. Staff like Jazmin and Coralia do help during the leasing process, but once you move in, residents face overcharged monthly bills (listing advertised rent often $200+ less than actual charges), cracked walls, mildew in appliances, and roach infestations that six months of pest complaints cannot resolve. The pool rarely opens for more than a few weeks yearly.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#33

54

Centennial Court Apartments

★2.3(441)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Most residents describe serious problems: pervasive roaches requiring multiple pest control calls, frequent water and internet outages, and slow or inadequate maintenance responses. A few graduate students and engaged residents found the location convenient and some staff helpful, but the overwhelming majority report the place is outdated, expensive for the condition, and poorly managed. Rent increases without corresponding improvements have compounded frustration. The business lists 24/7 support and UTAPD security, yet reviewers consistently say office staff ignore requests, ignore emails, and delay action on emergencies like ceiling leaks and pest infestations. Even when maintenance shows up, repairs are temporary; one resident described bathtub epoxy failing within a week, only to repeat the cycle. Move-in transparency and deposit handling are additional red flags.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#34

57

Crossroads at Arlington

★3.6(261)·✓ Google-verified

Residents report spacious units and praise leasing staff like Brittany Miller and manager Lucy Garcia for their professionalism and attentiveness. However, the overwhelming pattern is critical: maintenance requests routinely take weeks without resolution, mold and roach infestations persist despite reports, leaks are left unrepaired for months, and management becomes dismissive or unavailable once residents move in. Multiple tenants describe being charged substantial move-out fees after disputes with code compliance, and security concerns have worsened as cameras remain non-functional despite ongoing theft. The tension between initial leasing experience and post-move deterioration is stark. A few named staff deliver genuine care, but systemic maintenance failure, poor communication channels, and a shift in management responsiveness create a pattern of broken promises that directly affects health and safety, from inadequate AC to unresolved electrical hazards.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

View profile

#35

65

The Village at Johnson Creek Apartment Homes

★3.7(59)·✓ Google-verified

Staff consistency is the standout: Sam (maintenance supervisor) and leasing team members like Adrianne, Amanda, Natoya, and Tonya earn repeated praise for quick responses and patient assistance. Residents describe a quiet, secure place suited to seniors, though a few note cramped floorplans and aging finishes.

Senior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

View profile

#36

60

101 Center

★3.6(588)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Reviewers describe a split experience tied partly to recent management changes. Some praise Hayden's leasing responsiveness and note that Clayton and Mackenzie have improved maintenance turnaround and communication. Others, mostly students, report a pattern of building-wide roach problems management refused to treat, slow or failed repairs (AC in summer heat, dishwasher for months), lost packages, broken security gates, and deposit charges arriving months after move-out. Current residents with responsive staff contact report quick fixes; longer-term residents and those unable to reach management cite frustration and feeling ignored. Location near UT Arlington and furnished options draw renters despite the complaints. The gap between positive reviews citing staff by name and negative reviews about institutional failures suggests experience depends heavily on which manager and team members a tenant encounters, and which stage of the building's maintenance cycle they occupy.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

View profile

#37

52

Rosemont at Mayfield Villas

★2.6(134)·✓ Google-verified

Rosemont at Mayfield Villas draws overwhelming criticism for harsh parking enforcement and poor management responsiveness. One elderly resident was forced to sleep in her car due to towing policies; others report repeated application delays, staff who give conflicting information, cockroach problems, and undisclosed fees. A single five-star review praised highway access and maintenance responsiveness, but this stands alone among 60% one/two-star ratings.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing

View profile

#38

58

Trinity Trace

★2.8(123)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Long-term residents and recent arrivals praise the quiet grounds, approachable maintenance staff (including Joe, Pam, Jenny, and Vianca), and spacious layouts. The complex welcomes second-chance applicants. However, scattered reports of roaches and mold, outdated AC systems, and repeated complaints about steep renewal rates and undisclosed move-out charges undercut the positives.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#39

57 low data

Center Chase Apartments at 3rd Street

★4.1(23)

Center Chase Apartments offers loft-style units steps from UTA with in-unit washers/dryers and a strong property manager. Tenants praise the quiet location and responsive emergency maintenance, but recent reviews flag high electricity bills, summer heat from window AC units, and slow routine maintenance turnaround.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent Housing

View profile

#40

58

Park City Townhomes Apartments

★3.4(156)·✓ Google-verified·Publishes prices

Park City's resident base splits sharply: most residents praise Lisa and the management team for their warmth, quick maintenance responses, and family-friendly atmosphere. However, a consistent thread of one-star reviews flags persistent pest infestations, communication breakdowns, and cosmetic repairs that mask underlying maintenance issues, creating real doubt about consistency across units.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#41

51

Riverbend

★3.1(98)·✓ Google-verified

Riverbend draws sharply divided reviews: about half rate it five stars, half give one or two. Residents who praise cite responsive maintenance, community events, and friendly staff; those with complaints report roaches and rats, recurring flooding, maintenance entering unlocked doors without notice, excessive towing despite paying for parking, and dismissive management. Several reviews name managers Esther and Susan, with vastly different experiences. Rent ranges cited near $1,800-2,000 monthly.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#42

55

The District on Collins

★2.9(241)·✓ Google-verified

Front desk staff, particularly Carolina, earn consistent praise for friendliness and communication. However, this is overwhelmed by widespread complaints about pest infestations residents handle themselves, maintenance that marks work complete without visiting, and billing surprises. Multiple families with children report rats and roaches throughout units despite paying pest control fees; some waited months for basic repairs like air conditioning. The contrast between leasing experience and actual living conditions is stark.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#43

53

848 Mitchell

★2.4(444)·✓ Google-verified

848 Mitchell offers spacious and affordable units near UTA, but reviews reveal deep problems with maintenance, cleanliness, and management responsiveness. Residents report roach and mold infestations, amenities that sit broken or closed for months, and staff ranging from genuinely welcoming to dismissive and rude. Many tenants felt trapped by unclear fees and incomplete repairs, while a smaller group praised the leasing team's attentiveness. The split between glowing and damning reviews is stark, but the volume of detailed complaints about health and safety concerns outweighs the positive experiences.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

View profile

#44

53

Round Rock Townhomes

★3.5(32)

Five-star reviewers praise the quiet setting and attentive maintenance staff (particularly Elizabeth and Adriana), with spacious units at reasonable cost. One-star reviews paint a stark opposite picture: persistent roach infestations, crumbling drywall, non-functional HVAC, and aggressive move-out fees of $500 to $3,500, often charged despite units being clean at departure.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#45

53

Holly Park Apartments

★3.1(38)

Long-term residents praise the grounds, responsive maintenance, and welcoming staff like Gudelia and Gladys, describing a quiet, family-friendly space. However, recent and mid-tenure reviews flag aggressive towing, parking chaos, slow HVAC repairs, outdated cabinets and refrigerators, and management unprofessionalism, with deposits allegedly withheld and vehicles repeatedly towed even when properly registered.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

View profile

#46

36 low data

University Village

★3.7(3)·Publishes prices

Evidence is limited to one negative review from two years ago. That reviewer praised maintenance speed but criticized the apartment layout, noting the small living room, disproportionately large bedroom, and kitchen cabinets mounted too high to reach easily.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing

View profile