Affordable & Low-Income Housing in Fort Worth, TX

Page 2 of 2: businesses ranked 101-190 of 190. Start from the top.

The Crosby Apartments

#101

59

The Crosby Apartments

3.3(201)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Crosby divides sharply. Five-star reviews praise Tyler's attentiveness and affordable rents that stay low on renewal, with some tenants noting manageable utility bills and occasional quick maintenance. One-star tenants report the opposite experience: ignored requests after signing, window leaks unfixed for months, roaches invading from vacated units, water bills spiking unpredictably, and management blamed for miscommunication on move-in. Crime and towing threats loom large in negative accounts. The gap between positive and negative stories suggests either vastly different treatment across tenants or rapid swings in management responsiveness.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Mason Apartment Homes

#102

60

The Mason Apartment Homes

3.6(173)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Mason has a polarized track record. When staff like Cory, Ayla, and Marissa engage, residents report helpful service. But structural mold, roach infestations, slow repairs, management churn, and move-in chaos dominate the complaints. Rent starts affordably, yet surprise fees and costly towing practices offset the price advantage. Reviewers cite a property in decline over the past 18 months.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living

Cobble Hill

#103

59

Cobble Hill

3.5(126)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are enthusiastic; the other half report serious problems. Recent arrivals and visitors praise the new manager Devin and staff member Kellie, clean spaces, and fair pricing around $875 monthly. But long-term residents describe years of roach infestations, slow pest control responses, and office staff (particularly Lori) who ignore maintenance requests and don't answer calls. A few moved to different buildings and still faced infestations. Communication breakdowns extend to canceling tours without notice and denying refundable application fees. For affordability and pets, this complex works. The grounds have improved under new management. But verify pest control thoroughly before signing a lease, especially for units toward the back of the property. Ask for a pre-move inspection and get promises about pest treatment in writing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Mariposa Park Apartments

#104

59

Mariposa Park Apartments

3.5(103)✓ Google-verified

Mariposa Park has made a dramatic turnaround under new management. Melina, Edith, Rafael, and other staff are consistently praised for fast problem-solving, hands-on presence, and genuine care for residents. However, security remains a concern: the back parking lot lacks lighting, creating a serious safety risk for residents leaving early or late. Maintenance quality varies, and earlier management was poor enough to drive complaints. The complex attracts residents seeking affordability and stability. Staff turnover has been visible, but current team members are winning trust through daily availability and follow-through on repairs. For those prioritizing staff responsiveness and community feel over amenities, this is a solid pick. Those needing guaranteed security should look elsewhere or ask specifically about lighting plans.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Ironwood Crossing Apartments & Townhomes

#105

59

Ironwood Crossing Apartments & Townhomes

3.4(277)✓ Google-verified

New management has turned operations around with visible property improvements, responsive maintenance, and staff like Elena, Dana, and Charles earning repeated praise for going above and beyond. However, some residents report ongoing construction delays, garbage overflow, and uneven service quality; affordability keeps residents anchored despite these gaps.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Marine Park Apartments

#106

59 low data

Marine Park Apartments

3.7(77)✓ Google-verified

Staff earns consistent praise for helpfulness and professionalism, with several tenants naming specific team members who eased their move-in. Serious soundproofing issues and aggressive upfront screening frustrate some prospective and current renters.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Chaparral Ranch Homes

#107

59

Chaparral Ranch Homes

3.7(60)✓ Google-verified

Strong praise comes from residents who experience Shannon, Gwen, and Adrian's personal attention during leasing and smooth moves, plus long-term tenants who report quick maintenance and a peaceful setting. However, dozens of applicants and current residents describe delayed responses to repair requests (ant infestations returning within hours, thermostats left unfixed), no proactive follow-up on maintenance, and application rejections sprung at move-in deadlines when the business failed to flag income limits upfront. Communication issues dominate: new management since October appears less accessible, the office sometimes refuses to help existing tenants, and mailroom access is restricted to 9a-6p weekdays only despite residents paying for amenities. The business markets resort-like homes and amenities but reviews reveal inconsistency in delivering them. Trash piles up outdoors, the mailroom system is unsecured (anyone can access packages), and repairs that should be routine (thermostat, gate fix) stall for weeks. Staff named positively in older reviews no longer appear; newer reviews cite rudeness and disorganization. Residents feel service quality depends on whether you are a new applicant or an existing tenant.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Taylor Commons

#108

59

Taylor Commons

3.6(140)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Cory's recent management and maintenance staff (Tim) have earned strong praise for responsiveness and professionalism, especially among new residents and those who have seen recent improvement. Serious infrastructure issues-summer heat failures, unresolved pest problems, closed amenities (pool, social area) despite repeated promises-frustrate established tenants and suggest maintenance backlog over quick fixes. Long-term residents report feeling deprioritized as the community prioritizes new move-ins. Hidden fees, sporadic security, and amenity hours that don't match resident schedules add to wear and discontent despite the friendliness of some staff.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living

Aero Apartments

#109

59

Aero Apartments

3.0(217)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise recent management changes and the maintenance app when it works, but recurring complaints about roaches, delayed repairs, and broken utilities like AC during summer heat contradict service promises. The divide is sharp: satisfied tenants credit cleanliness and responsibility, while frustrated ones report management ignores maintenance tickets, changes staff constantly, and prioritizes rent collection over habitability.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Cambridge Court

#110

59

Cambridge Court

3.6(144)✓ Google-verified

Tenants who worked with Monique Sanchez report warm, professional leasing interactions and rate the experience highly. However, longer-term residents describe mismanaged amenities that remain permanently closed, slow maintenance, pest problems, and a newer management team perceived as unresponsive and indifferent to tenant concerns. The gap between new-tenant satisfaction and resident complaints suggests first impressions hide operational challenges. Amenities advertised on the website (pool, fitness center) are described by year-long residents as never operational. Office phone calls go unanswered, vehicle towing is strictly enforced, and turnover in the maintenance and office staff is frequent.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Stella

#111

63

The Stella

3.7(211)✓ Google-verified

Staff turnover in recent months improved the experience, with newer management (Ashley, Brenda, Tresh) earning consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, long-standing operational problems persist: multiple residents report systematic billing errors, overcharges they had to catch themselves, and move-out fees charged despite miscommunication from the office. Safety is a critical concern repeated across recent reviews, with residents documenting frequent police activity for overdoses, open drug use on common grounds, and homeless people at night. Move-in conditions were poor enough several residents photographed damage and filth; pest problems and cigarette odor have made units uncomfortable for families. Maintenance crew responds quickly and professionally. The office staff under new management are friendly and helpful with lease questions. Yet billing remains chaotic, move-out procedures unclear, and the neighborhood environment at portions of the complex is unsafe enough that residents felt they could not walk alone or recommend the property despite appreciating the staff. The gap between what residents were charged and what they received is the core frustration.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Western Station apartments

#112

62

Western Station apartments

3.6(285)✓ Google-verified

Staff member Maria Briseño earns consistent praise for professionalism during tours and move-in. Grounds are safe and quiet with modern finishes. However, repeated residents report months-long waits for AC fixes, water leaks, pest infestations, and mold. The emergency maintenance line often fails to connect. Management lies about unit availability and lease terms, then avoids callbacks. Once locked in, residents struggle to reach anyone to enforce promised repairs or lease credits. One resident's update suggests recent managerial changes and pool reopenings are underway. A long-term resident notes LiveNJoy management (the operator) is short-staffed, difficult to escalate with, and overcharges residents. Corporate offices ignored complaints until a resident found their direct email.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Hub at Chisholm Trail

#113

59

The Hub at Chisholm Trail

3.5(359)✓ Google-verified

James Parker's attentive leasing support and a refreshed management team have earned strong recent praise, though the property faces serious operational gaps. Residents report maintenance requests vanishing, phones that ring unanswered, pest infestations, and safety concerns like unlit walkways that persist despite repeated requests. The affordability appeals, but move-in chaos and neglected repairs frustrate long-term residents. New management is actively working to improve the grounds, and maintenance crews are visible, but residents need faster follow-through to close the gap between good intentions and lived experience.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

#114

59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(114)✓ Google-verified

Slate has split sharply along a management change: since March 2026, tenants praise responsive staff (especially Meshun Davis), active renovations, and the reopened pool. Before that shift, residents faced pest problems, mold, poor communication, and unresolved maintenance issues. The location near Fort Worth groceries and highways and cleaning standards are strengths when managed well. New tenants report smooth leasing tours; long-term residents from the pre-2026 era warn against the property entirely.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Lancaster Apartments

#115

54

Lancaster Apartments

2.9(70)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise maintenance technician Jaime for swift, thorough repairs and the office staff (including Abril) for friendliness. One complaint alleges discriminatory treatment in payment processing and language barriers. The wide rating split (40% five-star, 50% one/two-star) reflects a sharp divide: recent visitors describe efficient maintenance and a calm environment, while at least one reviewer felt excluded.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

#116

59 low data

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

3.8(44)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Palm Tree for its quiet atmosphere and cleanliness. Staff are consistently described as friendly, and management keeps up maintenance despite the property's age. Monthly pest control and modern amenities round out the experience, though some have noted the buildings are older.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Dunmore Apartments

#117

58

Dunmore Apartments

3.2(156)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Some tenants praise the staff's warmth and the affordable pricing, but persistent maintenance delays and application communication breakdowns frustrate others. Long-term residents report rising costs, infrastructure problems, and neighborhood safety concerns that offset the clean grounds and friendly office team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Leuda May Apartments

#118

54

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Furnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Park Creek Apartments

#119

67

Park Creek Apartments

4.0(205)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff-especially maintenance (Aaron, Daniel, Arnold, Steven) and front office (Michelle, Veronica, Kieyana, Estefania)-consistently go beyond the job to help tenants. Facilities stay clean, gym and pool work well, and move-outs are smooth. Security gaps remain a real problem: repeat car thefts, broken gates, and loud late-night pool use; dog waste rules are widely ignored.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Siddons Place Apartments

#120

58

Siddons Place Apartments

3.8(26)✓ Google-verified

Residents who stayed long-term often felt at home here, appreciating staff who care and enough space for families. Persistent issues with pool closures and roaches, plus a reported deposit retention problem, tempered satisfaction for some.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Hulen Heights Apartments

#121

53 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Strong long-term residents and manager Diane's attention earn consistent five-star praise, but office availability complaints and a serious discrimination allegation split opinion sharply. Older units with wear show; location near Central Market is a draw for most.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Celine

#122

58

The Celine

2.7(224)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth and apartment size draw people in; five-star reviewers praise named team members like Selena, Crystal, and Lauren for attentiveness and quick responses. The darker side emerges quickly: residents report unbearable summer heat with blocked AC requests, move-in units crawling with roaches and stripped of water, maintenance tickets logged but never completed, and a pattern of hidden fees stacking advertised rent to nearly 20% higher. Security failures (car break-ins, improper towing) and withheld deposits pile onto the frustration. Recent management changes hint at systemic turnover. Some residents who stick it out a year report positive experiences; others flee before their lease ends or pursue legal action. The split between five-star and one/two-star reviews (40% vs 55%) reflects this divide: you either hit responsive management and avoid major repairs, or you land in a unit needing work that never materializes and a lease office that ghosts you.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Huntley

#123

67

The Huntley

4.0(173)✓ Google-verified

The Huntley delivers strong first impressions: leasing staff like Shoni and Shawnie Davis earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and new units are clean and well-presented. However, long-term residents report serious frustration with thin walls, chronic parking garage theft, and a management that does not respond meaningfully to safety or noise complaints. The disconnect between the tour experience and life after move-in is stark.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Silversage Point at Western Center

#124

57

Silversage Point at Western Center

3.3(108)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent tenants and prospective renters praise staff warmth and quick repairs under strong management, but many long-term residents report chronic failures: leaks go unfixed for months, roaches persist despite complaints, and management changes so often that follow-up work stops. The property appears livable under stable leadership but unstable when the office turnover returns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Oak Ridge Apartments

#125

59 low data

Oak Ridge Apartments

4.0(21)

New owners transformed the complex with security upgrades, lighting, and fresh grounds. Residents praise fast maintenance, quiet atmosphere, and grounds upkeep, though limited recent feedback makes current conditions unclear.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing

The Henderson

#126

61

The Henderson

3.6(268)✓ Google-verified

Strong personal connections with staff drive some residents to move in and stay, while infrastructure neglect, unprofessional management, and billing disputes push others out swiftly. Praise centers on individual staff members (Linda, Jonetta Brooks, maintenance crew), but complaint reviews detail years of deferred upkeep, water damage, mold, pest issues, and frustrating charge disputes that dwarf the friendly service experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

McCart Apartments

#127

61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Jefferson Ederville

#128

57

Jefferson Ederville

3.8(18)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Faith, Darius, Valerie, and Carlos earn consistent praise for going above and beyond during tours and maintenance. The newer construction, fitness center, pool, game rooms, and pricing draw residents in. However, a sharp divide emerges: those approved report satisfaction, while applicants face weeks of silence, repeated document requests, and denials only days before move-in, with property manager Brittany cited repeatedly for disorganization and poor follow-up. The leasing process remains the core complaint. Staff appear to ignore or silence phones while applicants attempt contact thirty times with no response. Multiple reviewers say they followed instructions months in advance, only to be told at the last moment they did not qualify, despite providing all requested paperwork. Location near Six Flags, AT&T Stadium, and Globe Life Field appeals to some, but the attainable housing program requires clear communication it currently lacks.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Cooper Apartments

#129

66

The Cooper Apartments

3.8(356)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the leasing team's efficiency and personal attention, with staff like Ana and Michelle earning specific credit for making move-in straightforward and stress-free. The grounds feel clean and welcoming, the location suits students near TCU and professionals, and pet owners appreciate the safety for walks. However, one reviewer cited steep pricing ($1.3k for basic units) alongside concerns about past management failures and a significant fire, raising questions about whether recent improvements have fully addressed earlier operational problems.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Sunset Heights Apartments

#130

57

Sunset Heights Apartments

3.5(51)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Bree and Tiarra earn genuine praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, and the location draws people who value proximity to downtown and quiet surroundings. However, persistent pest issues (roaches, fleas), sluggish maintenance response, frequent management changes, and complaints about noise and poorly maintained grounds undercut the experience for many long-term residents. Expect inconsistency.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Crest at River District Apartments

#131

57 low data

Crest at River District Apartments

3.6(31)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Crest at River District draws praise for modern units, helpful staff like Carlos and Johnny, and a quiet location near restaurants and trails. However, some tenants report slow repairs on serious damage, poor management responsiveness, noise complaints from neighboring residents, pest problems, and frustration over ESA breed restrictions that may conflict with Fair Housing protections. Experiences vary considerably depending on when you move in and which staff members you work with.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Park West Apartments

#132

57

Park West Apartments

3.8(20)✓ Google-verified

Park West's reputation has split sharply along timeline lines. Residents who arrived or renewed within the last few months praise a new management team (Anthony, Tammy, Christina, Elena, Calvin, Jesse) as warm and responsive, noting the grounds are cleaner, gates now work, and amenities like a theater room and smart home tech feel genuinely valuable. Older complaints paint a darker picture: roaches, broken pool and gym equipment, work orders ignored for years, rude staff, and security issues including theft and break-ins. The shift feels real, but lingering maintenance backlogs and a history of neglect mean tenants considering a move here should verify conditions in person and clarify response times in writing. The pet-friendly side (bark park on site) draws positive mention, though no detailed pet policy review text appears. Prices are described as "incredible" by one recent renter, but the 20-review spread is steep-65 percent five-star against 30 percent one/two-star-suggesting either genuine recent improvement or the reality that affordability masks unresolved problems for those not yet affected.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Columbia Renaissance Square Senior Residences

#133

59 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square Senior Residences

4.2(20)✓ Google-verified

Most recent visitors praise the clean units, friendly staff led by manager Kisha, and community perks like the movie theater. Longer-term concerns emerge: parking fills after 7 p.m. with visitor and stray vehicles, the main elevator has been down over two months, and some report a gradual decline in grounds upkeep and hallway appearance.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living

Highland Park Apartments

#134

59

Highland Park Apartments

3.6(91)✓ Google-verified

Highland Park's leasing team, especially Daisy and Kenda, earns consistent praise for patience and knowledge. Maintenance and property management divide opinion sharply: some residents report timely fixes and friendly responses; others faced months of ignored requests, pest problems, and water damage. The quiet location near Clearfork appeals to renters, but the aging buildings and wear require realistic expectations.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Handley Oaks Apartments

#135

59

Handley Oaks Apartments

4.0(59)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers split sharply on Handley Oaks. Many praise the office staff (particularly Norma and Lupita) for helpfulness, the quiet grounds, and the clean remodeled units on move-in. However, a persistent minority report serious roach infestations that management fails to remedy, alongside complaints of rent overcharging, inadequate pest control, and staff becoming unresponsive once leases are signed. The property appears well-maintained when working, but pest issues are a deal-breaker for some.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Sansom Bluff Apartments

#136

60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(198)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff offers spacious apartments with good amenities and standout maintenance and activities staff. However, the leasing office consistently fails to answer phones or provide welcoming service, and management shows dismissive attitudes once residents move in. The property itself appeals to pet owners and families, but office staff turnover has left frustrated residents who feel unwelcome when they need help.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Laurel Heights at Cityview

#137

65

Laurel Heights at Cityview

3.8(363)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing team and maintenance response draw praise, but recurring appliance failures and parking issues frustrate long-term residents. Recent improvements to gates and water service suggest management is addressing past problems, though enforcement gaps remain.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Springs

#138

51

The Springs

2.8(121)✓ Google-verified

The Springs has deteriorated significantly. Residents report mold in walls and vents, roaches, rats, and possums throughout units. Maintenance is slow or nonexistent; water damage goes unfixed for months. Office staff are described as rude and unresponsive. A few past staff members earned praise, but recent management changes have worsened communication and responsiveness. The complex faces structural failures, squatters in vacant units, and potential closure.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Mercantile Square

#139

55

Mercantile Square

2.9(227)✓ Google-verified

Mercantile Square delivers affordable apartments with occasional moments of exceptional maintenance work, but systemic problems undermine the value. Accounting errors, falsified move-in incentives, amenities that stay closed for months, and slow repairs leave residents frustrated despite recent management changes.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Bella Via Apartments

#140

56

Bella Via Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise Diana and Johana's personal attention and responsiveness, alongside affordable rents and move-in condition. Others report months of ignored noise complaints, slow maintenance, safety worries (vehicle theft, nearby gunshots), and leasing office delays that cost applicants time before rejection or approval notification errors.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Jefferson Elara

#141

56

Jefferson Elara

3.7(15)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

A newly built complex with genuinely attentive leasing staff on good days (Xavier and Kyla draw repeated praise), but applicants report weeks of silence, conflicting information, and unclear policies on income restrictions. Residents praise the apartments themselves and gated community feel, yet complain of surveillance-style inspections and restrictive rules on minor things like trash timing. The experience pivots sharply on which staff member you reach-and whether you reach anyone at all.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Axis Waterfront

#142

59

Axis Waterfront

3.0(306)✓ Google-verified

The leasing office staff, especially Henry and Trenna, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and fast approvals, making the rental process smooth for relocating families. Behind that friendly front sits a complex with persistent maintenance failures: roaches and gnats in units, weekly water outages, aging electrical systems, and management that ignores concerns or resists early lease termination despite serious safety issues. Maintenance problems appear intermittent rather than universal, but when they occur, complaints about unresponsive management and billing disputes dominate. Residents report staying years when satisfied, and pet owners appreciate the dog amenities. Long-term renewals suggest the community works for some, while others describe their experience as unsafe and unmanageable.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Summit at Unique Garden Apartments

#143

58 low data

Summit at Unique Garden Apartments

3.8(29)✓ Google-verified

Recent reviews highlight staff responsiveness and property cleanliness, with past residents praising the leasing process and management support. Current complaints center on heating failures going unaddressed for months, unresponsive office staff during business hours, and a nonfunctional emergency maintenance line.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Ryan Apartments

#144

59

The Ryan Apartments

3.4(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong staff like Cory and Chasity deliver seamless leasing and quick maintenance for many residents, earning consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness. Yet the complex struggles with systemic issues: pest infestations ignored by management, safety problems (gunshots, break-ins), and surprise fees that surface after move-in. Some long-term residents have watched conditions decline sharply over the past year. The dog park and fitness center appeal to those who prioritize amenities, but the management overhaul has not yet won back tenants facing AC failures and unresolved building maintenance.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Life at Westland Estates

#145

59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(191)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members Natisha and Amanda earn consistent praise for going beyond typical leasing help, moving tenants in smoothly, and arranging fast maintenance. The maintenance team responds quickly to reported issues. However, a smaller group of residents report roach infestations in units, unleashed dogs creating safety problems, and grounds left unclean. Pest entry through drains and chimneys went unresolved in some cases. Gym access limited to office hours leaves working residents unable to use the advertised on-site facility. Parking lot speeding and package theft were also mentioned. The complex appears split: those with responsive staff have stayed happy; those facing pest and safety issues found management unresponsive to complaints.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sunset Pointe Apartments

#146

58

Sunset Pointe Apartments

3.3(208)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews praise staff by name (Becky, Beverly) and report pleasant stays; longer residents recall good years before 2023. One-star reviews detail years of ignored maintenance requests, unresolved plumbing failures, pest infestations they were charged to treat, mystery cable billing, and management that avoids accountability. Some five-star reviewers acknowledge the mixed picture but credit staff effort for improvements. The gap mirrors the rating spread itself: enthusiastic five-stars versus deeply frustrated long-term tenants who report management declining since late 2023, inconsistent maintenance response, and charges for repairs typically the landlord's duty. Responsiveness varies dramatically by staff member.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

#147

58

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

3.4(246)✓ Google-verified

Staff treat tour-goers with genuine warmth and stay engaged during leasing, earning consistent praise for their time and professionalism. After move-in, the experience fractures: tenants report months of broken AC during 90-degree heat, non-functional security gates and locks that anyone can bypass, trash piling on floors with roaches present, and management that becomes unreachable by phone or email. Billing disputes linger unresolved, with some tenants sent to collections over contested charges; record-keeping errors persist across management transitions.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Bexley at Left Bank

#148

64

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(228)✓ Google-verified

The complex divides sharply: residents praise maintenance team members like Erin and Josh for fast, professional repairs, and appreciate community events. However, leasing office communication is inconsistent, with many reporting ignored calls and slow issue resolution. Serious concerns include lingering pet odors in hallways, thin walls that carry neighbor noise and cooking smells, pest infestations left unaddressed for months, and instances of billing disputes that damaged credit without signed leases. Building systems (gates, windows) also show wear and slow repair timelines. Layout and construction issues persist throughout: gaps in windows and doors, poor soundproofing, and insufficient weekend cleaning of common areas. The complex shines when upper management visits but struggles with daily operations. Staff quality varies widely by department, with some residents crediting recent hires Daniel and Erica for improving communication, while others cite years of being ignored by the office.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Renaissance Gardens

#149

63

Renaissance Gardens

3.7(192)✓ Google-verified

Strong office staff and recent management improvements keep long-term residents happy, but new tenants frequently encounter unit condition gaps and pest control struggles. Nelly and Lilia earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine effort. The property has modernized under new leadership, yet maintenance delays on critical issues (infestation, broken AC, plumbing) frustrate tenants seeking better living conditions. Quality varies sharply between what prospective renters see during tours and what they receive at move-in. Roach and gnat problems persist despite requests for treatment. A three-year resident notes work orders are now fixed promptly, but newer tenants report weak pest control responses and weeks-long waits for repairs.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Garden Gate Apartments

#150

52

Garden Gate Apartments

3.2(109)✓ Google-verified

Most negative reviews describe a complex with serious structural and pest problems that go unaddressed for months. Management communication is inconsistent: some residents praise staff responsiveness, but many report being ignored, misled, or charged unfairly after issues like broken doors and water damage are left unrepaired. A vocal minority had positive stays with no problems, but those represent a clear minority against detailed complaints about mold, thin walls, safety, and exploitative parking policies. The complex's greatest friction comes from a towing agreement that charges guests $22+ per visit after two free visits per week, which residents call discriminatory toward those with family support. Long-term maintenance failures-stove issues bandaged repeatedly, foundation cracks, upstairs leaks-suggest reactive rather than preventive repairs. Security is a recurring worry: unauthorized people in breezeways, break-in attempts witnessed, and homeless individuals on the grounds.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing

Candle Chase Apartments

#151

53 low data

Candle Chase Apartments

3.4(83)

Staff like Angela earn consistent praise for friendliness and responsiveness, and many residents find the rent affordable. However, major maintenance issues (flooding, cooling, roof leaks) persist unresolved for months, repairs take multiple visits, and past billing errors by management have trapped tenants in eviction disputes.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing

Patriot Pointe Apartments

#152

57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Spur Canyon Apartments

#153

54

Spur Canyon Apartments

3.3(324)✓ Google-verified

Spur Canyon's 3.3 rating reflects a property in crisis. While leasing agent Jermaine earns consistent praise for tour friendliness and technician Brandon received credit for swift AC repair, nearly 40 percent of reviews are one or two stars. Residents report months-long waits for AC fixes in summer heat, repeated flooding, rotten wood falling outside, raccoons in walls, and roaches inside. Fees surprise tenants, management avoids accountability, and the emergency maintenance line does not answer. Multiple reviewers say the property is unsafe and regret signing leases. The complex is 50 years old and shows it. Exterior damage, water ingress, pest infestation, and lack of emergency response form the core complaint. One resident reported waiting four months for repairs after flooding on November 4, 2024, with no resolution as of June 2026. Another pregnant tenant terminated her lease after a two-week wait for AC in 93-degree heat. Residents say the advertising misrepresents the unit and location condition. Staff turnover has made management worse since a new manager arrived.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Union at River East

#154

62

The Union at River East

3.7(234)✓ Google-verified

Staff members Orlando and Ryan earn consistent five-star praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, while the maintenance team responds quickly when called. The complex offers appealing amenities: infinity-edge pool, co-working space, outdoor seating, and flexible floor plans on a prime Race Street location. Yet rent at $1,800+ monthly brings high expectations the property has struggled to meet. Residents report a broken garage gate left unfixed for months, creating security gaps and theft. Management has been slow or dismissive on disability accommodations, key fob access failures, and billing errors. Move-in readiness and building access control remain friction points despite recent signs of operational improvement.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Historic Electric Building Apartments

#155

62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Amberwood Apartments

#156

56 low data

Amberwood Apartments

3.3(112)

Reviewers describe a complex divided starkly: some praise quiet, clean grounds and staff service, while others report serious health and safety problems including mold linked to ER visits, persistent roach infestations despite fumigation, AC and roof leaks, vehicle theft with uncooperative camera footage, and months-long refund delays. Management turnover has not resolved underlying maintenance gaps.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Everly Plaza

#157

61 low data

Everly Plaza

4.5(16)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews (2-4 years old) praise the quiet, clean setting and manager Tammy's welcoming approach. A one-star review from two months ago reports serious issues: bedbug infestation, trespassing, drug activity, theft of medication packages, and disruptive neighbors. The reviewer notes staff did little to address these problems.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

West 7th Apartments

#158

48 low data

West 7th Apartments

3.6(30)

Staff like Zoraya, Chris, Latoya, and Astra Management earn praise for friendliness and effort, and the courtyard and gardens appeal to those seeking calm. Serious flaws undercut the setting: repeated AC breakdowns, weeks-long repair waits even in summer heat, mold in flooded units, and trash buildup from weekly cleaning cycles make this risky for anyone with low tolerance for maintenance gaps or heat sensitivity.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Magnolia Park Apartments

#159

60

Magnolia Park Apartments

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Magnolia Park divides sharply: 72% of reviewers praise responsive staff, swift maintenance, and the West 7th location; leasing associates Camryn, Brooke, and Rikki are named repeatedly for going beyond move-in basics. However, 22% report persistent soundproofing failures in upper floors (units 302, 304 especially), and one recent guest with a service animal was fined $500, indicating management shifts that contradict earlier pet-friendly reputation. The complex handles maintenance within 24 hours and accommodates tenants thoughtfully, yet noise complaints span years unresolved and rent is cited as high relative to downtown options.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Mylo Apartment Homes

#160

61

Mylo Apartment Homes

3.6(439)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Nancy, Susan, Kyle, and Jason earn consistent praise for friendliness and quick service, especially during move-in and maintenance calls. However, residents report severe pest problems, unresolved AC and water damage, ignored maintenance requests, and poor trash pickup, with some families leaving after short stays due to heat and bug infestations. The welcome experience masks a pattern once you move in: work orders sit, pest control visits don't happen despite scheduled spraying, and management responses range from dismissive to accusatory. For families needing reliable upkeep and pest control, the gaps between promised service and delivery are significant.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Maxwell Apartments

#161

60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(342)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing and management staff, especially Alice and Veronica, earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism. However, maintenance response times have declined significantly under new leadership. Residents report week-long waits for repairs, repeated AC failures, and unresolved issues like malfunctioning gates and pest problems. Move-in experience is typically smooth, but post-move conflicts over deposits and fees (especially involving the AI chatbot) have escalated disputes. The complex's physical appearance draws approval when maintained, yet critical systems like cooling and emergency contact lines frequently fail. Those relocating for work value the location near Stockyards and Sundance Square; families should weigh maintenance reliability against the competitive leasing team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Alton Park Apartments

#162

50

Alton Park Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verified

Alton Park has a stark divide: some residents praise office staff and the grounds, but the majority report a frustrating move-in process with shifting timelines, staff rudeness, and maintenance failures. Amenities like the pool and gym operate office hours only, leaving working families unable to use them. Unresolved maintenance issues (AC, electrical hazards, faulty gate) and poor communication compound the problems.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Eastbank at Waterside

#163

59

Eastbank at Waterside

3.5(195)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff in the leasing office, especially Daisy, Samantha, and Martin, earn consistent praise for patience and helpfulness during the apartment search. The location near Trinity Trails, shopping, and highways appeals to residents, and many who have stayed long-term report clean grounds and timely maintenance work overall. However, management (identified as Catherine and Samantha in supervisory roles) faces repeated complaints about poor communication, inconsistency, and lack of follow-through. Residents report unresolved issues like flooding, mold, excessive pet waste in hallways, and questionable move-out charges that required disputes to overturn. The gap between the leasing team's professionalism and management's handling has driven departures.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

#164

54

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

3.1(423)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Amanda and Arthur shine during leasing, but the property itself struggles badly. Reviewers report months-long AC outages, non-functioning laundry, roach infestations, water damage, broken amenities, and pavement with large holes. Management does not respond to complaints or code violations, and tenants describe unit conditions so poor they postponed move-ins. One five-star reviewer praised Eric in maintenance for fixing multiple issues in a single visit, yet others say maintenance walks around smoking instead of addressing requests. The gap between leasing experience and living experience is stark. Tenants across multiple reviews mention feeling trapped: unprepared units, delayed move-ins, eviction notices despite rent credits for unlivable conditions, and corporate silence. This complex carries serious red flags for anyone without a strong alternative.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Babers Manor

#165

56 low data

Babers Manor

5.0(2)✓ Google-verified

One applicant expressed enthusiasm about the application process and anticipation of moving in, though evidence is limited from a single recent review.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Foundry

#166

50

The Foundry

2.9(95)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents report serious habitability problems: roaches and mice are persistent, maintenance fixes are temporary, and laundry equipment stays broken for months. The office staff (Mary and Kristi notably) are consistently praised for friendliness and responsiveness, but they cannot overcome systemic property neglect. New visitors on tours see a clean presentation, yet actual residents struggle with pest control that barely functions, poor grounds maintenance, and emergency services gaps that have caused property damage and health concerns. Reviewers also note the surrounding neighborhood feels unsafe with frequent police activity and car break-ins. The pool opens and closes off-schedule despite posted times. One two-year resident called it a poor value for the rent; another long-term tenant said conditions worsen yearly despite slow rent increases.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Brittany Apartments

#167

54

The Brittany Apartments

3.4(298)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents report a sharp divide: staff like Nana, DeLa, and Asia earn genuine praise for warmth and professionalism in the office, but infrastructure problems dominate the experience. Water outages, heating failures, and plumbing issues recur monthly, with maintenance taking days or weeks to respond and often lacking parts. Residents face bills over $300 for utilities tied to building failures they do not control, unclear pest control service, and an AI phone system that frustrates callers trying to reach management. One long-term resident escaped after rates jumped from $1,200 to $1,600 monthly. The office team's attentiveness stands out starkly against neglected grounds (trash, unmaintained trees, acorns on walkways) and unresolved maintenance backlogs. Reviewers note a pattern of management turnover and promise a shift toward better conditions, but repeated failures across water systems, parking enforcement, and pest response persist. Walking in to speak face-to-face with staff appears more effective than calling or using the digital channels.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living

Beach Street Center

#168

46 low data

Beach Street Center

5.0(3)✓ Google-verified

Limited review evidence. One five-star review notes a positive experience. The business operates as an insurance and commercial space provider, not a traditional apartment complex.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing

Buttercup Place Apartments

#169

50 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.4(20)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place draws deeply committed residents, including those rebuilding from homelessness, who praise the community and staff support. Recent reviews flag ongoing pest issues, unresponsive phone lines, and safety concerns in shared spaces that undercut the positive foundation.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Residences of Diamond Hill

#170

53

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(145)✓ Google-verified

Severe maintenance and pest issues dominate resident feedback, with tenants reporting cockroaches, ants, and spiders in newly-painted units alongside unprompted move-in claims. Staff responsiveness is a consistent friction point: applications get lost, maintenance tickets close without work completed, AC failures go unresolved, and communication from the office is sparse or nonexistent. A handful of five-star reviews praise the community's safety for families and mention helpful staff members, but these stand against a sea of complaints spanning years.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Crestwood Place Apartments

#171

53

Crestwood Place Apartments

3.5(84)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents describe steady decline under current management, with broken amenities (laundry, gym access), delayed repairs (AC took a month; washers out for months), and inconsistent enforcement. While some staff members earn praise for kindness, the complex feels neglected overall, with office hours severely limited and tenant complaints routinely ignored. Management changes frequently, and residents report paying for amenities they cannot access.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Westmount at River Park Apartments

#172

53

Westmount at River Park Apartments

3.4(218)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Westmount at River Park is split sharply between strong praise for leasing staff and deep frustration with management, maintenance, and condition. Long-term residents cite repeated turnover in management, inconsistent policies, unresponsive offices, hidden fees that weren't refunded, and deteriorating units. The pool has stayed closed for months despite being a resident priority, the workout room smells bad, and in-unit amenities like washers and hot water fail or were never installed as promised. Staff at the leasing desk earn consistent five-star reviews for helpfulness. Those staying report feeling safe but exhausted by the complex's rigid policies and slow repairs. The business advertises one- and two-bedroom options with pet services, a fitness center, and coffee bar. Their website lists special move-in offers. In practice, reviewers say move-in deals go unpaid, parking is heavily restricted, and maintenance requests languish. One tenant with strong payment history faced eviction proceedings after requesting a single payment delay. Newer residents sometimes report good initial experiences; longer-term occupants describe escalating frustration with unresponsive management and inability to reach named staff like Brittany.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Spring Glen Apartments

#173

46 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen draws long-term residents who value the peaceful setting and responsive management, though the pool's chronic closure frustrates prospects counting on that amenity. Evidence is limited to brief reviews spanning several years, with mixed satisfaction tilting toward stability for those already settled in.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

#174

57

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

3.4(149)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sandshell divides sharply. Those staying long-term praise the quiet grounds, pool events, and genuinely helpful staff members like Hailey and Garrett. But newer residents hit a wall fast: cockroaches carpet the laundromat, mice run across floors, ants infest bathrooms, and mold hangs in the air. Water cuts off for hours without warning, parking enforcement tows cars at 1 a.m. with no advance notice, and move-out inspections generate five-figure damage charges that reviewers say don't match photos they took. The complex bills itself as luxury on its website, but reviews describe it as poorly maintained, aging apartments sold at premium prices. One long-term resident's later review warns that management uses move-out inspections to retain deposits aggressively. Multiple reviewers mention switching to nearby alternatives like The Hadley because pest and infrastructure problems go unresolved for weeks or months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Normandale Place Apartments

#175

49 low data

Normandale Place Apartments

3.8(14)✓ Google-verified

Normandale Place draws strong praise for safety and staff warmth, but recent reviews flag serious concerns: renters report being shown clean sample units then moved to deteriorated ones at higher rent once leases are signed. The property's grey cinderblock design leaves some residents feeling the space does not match its marketing promise of dignity.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Columbia Renaissance Square

#176

56 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Residents report standout staff members who respond quickly and organize weekly events, but persistent pest problems, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, and inconsistent maintenance undercut the experience. Some praise the move-in condition and fitness amenities; others cite unprepared temp workers and a six-year decline in upkeep.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

#177

49

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

2.6(72)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants describe a complex in serious disrepair where basic requests go unaddressed for months, management ignores legal notices, and residents resort to court action to force compliance. Staff turnover is constant, billing is unreliable, and pests (roaches, beetles) persist despite cleaned units. A handful reported helpful staff, but systemic issues dominate the experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Vega Place Apartments

#178

56 low data

Vega Place Apartments

3.8(12)✓ Google-verified

Older reviews highlight a welcoming community with a duck pond and attentive former management, but recent posts describe neglected grounds since a manager departed. Serious historical complaints include safety gaps, unannounced apartment entries, and selective pet policy enforcement; grounds upkeep remains the most current concern.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Gardens At Cobb Park

#179

55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Times Square On the Hill

#180

50

Times Square On the Hill

2.9(45)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff-especially Jordan and Benitta-earn consistent praise for kindness and clear communication during move-in. Long-term residents report feeling safe and well-managed. However, newer complaints flag vehicle theft, parking headaches, and delayed fixes on water and maintenance issues, suggesting inconsistent upkeep.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Calloway Place Apartments

#181

54

Calloway Place Apartments

3.6(28)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Calloway Place draws strong loyalty from residents who praise quick maintenance response and staff like Penny and Amanda. However, a significant minority report unresolved structural issues (cracked roofs left with temporary fixes, faulty AC units), hidden billing charges, and harsh towing enforcement that catches residents off guard.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Northill Manor

#182

43 low data

Northill Manor

2.3(3)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Limited review evidence: two one-star accounts detail severe complaints about management conduct, rent hikes, and payment disputes. No positive experiences documented.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Fort West Apartments

#183

46

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments struggles with fundamental maintenance and management failures that create unsafe living conditions. Tenants report raw sewage backups lasting months, unchecked roach infestations, mold, and flooded units with no follow-up. The property management is consistently unreachable; complaints go unanswered and maintenance requests stall indefinitely. A controversial towing policy charges $350 per vehicle despite unclear registration procedures, and the office is often vacant. A handful of long-term residents praise quiet periods and responsive staff, but they appear to be exceptions in a complex marked by code violations, inadequate staffing, and systemic neglect.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Moderne

#184

51

The Moderne

3.2(24)✓ Google-verified

The Moderne shows a sharp divide between newer and older tenant experiences. Recent five-star reviews praise the updated management team (especially Sydnee), responsive service requests, and the West 7th location near dining and shops. However, older reviews paint a troubling picture of move-in disasters (mold, filthy units), neglected grounds, security breaches, and management indifference. The property allegedly operates Airbnbs alongside permanent housing, creating noise and property damage. Tenants report illegal insurance charges and unfair lease-blocking after maintenance issues.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Travis Gardens Apartments

#185

47 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

#186

47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Autumn Chase Apartments

#187

35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.2(56)

A mixed record: some tenants report attentive staff and timely fixes; many describe months-long repair delays, persistent roach problems, and sewage backups. Visitor parking fees ($3.25-$3.30 daily, $315 tow penalty) and frequent management changes underscore operational instability. Crime and noise complaints recur throughout. Newer reviews (past 2 years) are sparse and positive; the weight of detailed complaints is older but substantial.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Park Terrace Apartment

#188

32 low data

Park Terrace Apartment

2.7(13)

Park Terrace shows significant dissatisfaction: 54% of reviews are one or two stars, with tenants citing poor communication, outdated apartments, and trash on grounds. Maintenance staff Steve is praised for responsiveness, but management and front-desk interactions are frequently described as disrespectful or dismissive.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Creekside Apartment Homes

#189

33 low data

Creekside Apartment Homes

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Creekside offers studio through two-bedroom units across Fort Worth with pet-friendly policies and shared amenities including a fitness center, pool, and on-site laundry. Review data is limited, so prospective tenants should contact the property directly to verify current conditions and pricing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Village Creek Apartments

#190

17 low data

Village Creek Apartments

No rating yet

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing

Last updated 2026-08-23