Fort Worth Apartment Review Guide
Menu

Affordable & Low-Income Housing in Fort Worth, TX

Affordable & Low-Income Housing in Greater Fort Worth

Finding affordable housing in Fort Worth

Fort Worth has 163 apartment communities in our directory that offer some form of affordable or income-restricted housing, from properties that accept Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) to Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) developments with rents capped based on Area Median Income (AMI). These aren't all the same product. Some are privately owned buildings that set aside a portion of units for income-qualified renters. Others are fully income-restricted developments where every unit requires proof of income at move-in and again at annual recertification. Knowing which type you're looking at changes what paperwork you'll need and how long the wait might be.

What affordable housing actually involves

Most programs require you to document household income, household size, and sometimes citizenship or student status. Rent is typically set at a percentage of your income (common with voucher-based units) or at a fixed rate tied to 30%, 50%, or 60% of AMI (common with tax-credit properties). Waitlists are real here: some communities have openings now, others are closed to new applicants for months at a time. Calling ahead before you drive out to tour is worth the five minutes.

What to look for before signing

  • Whether the income restriction applies to all units or just a set-aside portion
  • Current wait time and whether the list is open or closed
  • What's included in rent: water, trash, pest control, and whether utilities are separately metered
  • Condition of the unit and common areas, not just the leasing office
  • Recertification requirements and what documentation you'll need to keep the rent rate

How our scoring helps

We rank properties using verified reviewer feedback, responsiveness, maintenance follow-through, and consistency over time rather than just star averages. That ranking lives in our best apartment complexes guide for Fort Worth, and the exact criteria we use are laid out on our methodology page.

Find an apartment in affordable & low-income housing in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info

All affordable & low-income housing in Fort Worth, TX, ranked by score and relevance

163 businesses, scored on recent reviews. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is affordable & low-income housing, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.

Bexley Clearfork
#1
82

Bexley Clearfork

4.7(372)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Isaiah, Alton, Emily, and Salvador earn consistent praise for warmth and quick responses. Residents note clean grounds, modern apartments, and strong property upkeep. However, pet waste accumulation, overflowing trash bins, open gates allowing tailgating, and delayed maintenance undermine the experience. A major mold and humidity failure went unresolved for months. For the price, many feel the complex lacks basic security and enforcement. Location near shopping, dining, and highways appeals to residents. EV charging stations exist but often sit occupied by non-EV owners due to unenforced parking rules. The gap between staff quality and management systems remains stark.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Overture River District
#2
82

Overture River District

4.8(59)✓ Google-verified

Residents and visitors consistently praise the staff, particularly sales associates Darla Young and Sierra Alexander for patient, pressure-free guidance through the leasing process. Maintenance responds quickly to requests, office staff remain helpful and smiling, and the community hosts regular social events like Wednesday gatherings. The property appeals strongly to retirees making the shift from home ownership to apartment living.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Summers Landing Apartments
#3
82

Summers Landing Apartments

4.3(273)✓ Google-verified

Summers Landing's leasing process stands out for Ivette Fonseca's patience and genuine care, with reviewers repeatedly praising her guidance through tours and apartment selection. The community itself earns consistent marks for clean grounds, functional amenities like the pool and laundry, and staff who make settling in feel effortless and welcoming. Office Manager Veronica and the maintenance team round out a property where move-in goes smoothly and residents report feeling valued from day one. Reviewers moving from out of state or starting fresh highlight the personal attention that shaped their decision to choose this complex.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Parker House
#4
81

Parker House

4.6(262)✓ Google-verified

Most residents experience attentive staff, fast maintenance turnarounds (often same-day), and a community where management treats people by name. The downtown Sundance Square location with modern finishes keeps satisfaction high for many long-term tenants. Two recent departing residents report over $1,000 in contested move-out bills for wear-and-tear items and phantom charges, with difficulty reaching management to dispute. Noise complaints and recent communication gaps during a payment system change suggest infrastructure stress; these issues sit alongside otherwise strong day-to-day care.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Deco
#5
80

Deco

4.8(114)✓ Google-verified

Residents and touring guests consistently praise Deco's downtown location, professional leasing team (especially Jeremy and Stephanie), and maintenance crew (Cory noted often). The concierge and management staff earn repeated recognition for going beyond what's asked. However, a 10-month resident reports management removed guest parking without notice, directing visitors to an unsafe, potholed lot with paid parking. Mechanical issues plague the building: elevators, doors, garage doors, hot tub, and pool have all failed. The promised first-floor restaurant remains unfinished after two and a half years. Management reportedly refuses to engage on these problems, citing "operational challenges." Rent exceeds $3,000 for a one-bedroom, raising expectations that have not been met.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Find an apartment in affordable & low-income housing in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info
Broadway Chapter
#6
80

Broadway Chapter

4.7(89)✓ Google-verified

Residents and prospective tenants consistently praise the staff, especially managers Halie, Izabella, Katie, and Megan, for patience and going beyond their role to help with applications and move-in. Units are modern and well-maintained, and the Bricktown location near restaurants and bars appeals to those wanting walkability. Two one-star reviews flag rude leasing interactions and unclear self-tour instructions, though these are outliers in an 89-review sample skewed heavily toward five-star ratings.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Rocklyn at Samuels
#7
78

Rocklyn at Samuels

4.4(225)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise a tight-knit staff and rapid maintenance response, with particular shout-outs to Richard (groundskeeping) and Nicole/Rose/Dominic (leasing). Management feels genuinely invested in resident comfort. Some frustration over pet deposit pricing, parking issues from adjacent winery patrons, and occasional cleanliness oversights, but these do not dampen the overall sense of a well-run property with strong morale. High staff turnover has occurred over the years, though core team members have remained. The property sits in a desirable downtown-adjacent location with appealing amenities. Most residents overlook isolated lapses in favor of the responsive, personable environment.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hangar 19
#8
78

Hangar 19

4.5(279)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise Hangar 19's physical upkeep, modern finishes, and standout maintenance team, especially Robert and Kevin. However, two recent prospective tenants reported cold, dismissive experiences with front office staff who seemed reluctant to help and failed to acknowledge scheduled tours. The split highlights a disconnect: long-term residents describe a well-run, caring community where management goes above and beyond; tour-takers encountered what they perceived as indifference and neglect at the point of entry. Staff named positively include Robert (maintenance), Kevin, Marcus, and Monique (leasing).

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
The Braden on Fifth
#9
77

The Braden on Fifth

4.4(179)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers consistently praise the leasing team for personal attention and the location near downtown Fort Worth. The building itself is clean, offers solid amenities like a gym and pool, and residents report friendly neighbors. However, a 2024 management change to Greystar has introduced real friction: visitor parking is severely limited, wifi drops frequently in common spaces, and office hours have become hard to reach during normal work days. Long-term residents appreciated consistency before the transition. The property draws young professionals and remote workers, who especially value the large communal office space with quiet pods. Maintenance tends to be responsive, though some issues (like broken TV screens and slow elevators) linger. Parking, however, remains the most repeated frustration-with only about 20 visitor spots for the entire complex.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Windsong Apartments
#10
77

Windsong Apartments

4.3(147)✓ Google-verified

Michael and Deanna in the leasing office greet residents by name and handle tours and applications with genuine warmth. Francisco and Logan on maintenance move fast and handle repairs thoroughly. The grounds are peaceful and clean, and long-term residents praise the diverse, respectful community. Two reviewers reported severe cockroach infestations that went unresolved despite multiple calls, turning a small problem into a building-wide issue. Most feedback centers on staff professionalism and responsiveness during move-in and ongoing tenancy. Those who encountered pest problems say management ignored repeated requests for help, which is the core complaint here. The 4.3 rating and 77% five-star distribution reflect strong day-to-day experience for most, but the pest failures leave a sharp edge.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Depot
#11
76

The Depot

4.2(245)✓ Google-verified

The Depot delivers consistent comfort in its Sundance Square location, with residents praising immaculate grounds, speedy maintenance responses, and genuinely personable staff. Spacious units and a quiet community feel justify the strong reputation, though parking policies lack clarity and building upkeep occasionally lapses in common areas.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Parkside So7 Urban Apartments
#12
74

Parkside So7 Urban Apartments

4.4(267)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the maintenance crew and location near Trinity Park, dining, and trails, with many calling it the best apartment experience they've had. Recent management changes have shaken confidence: some report grounds neglect, security lapses, false fire alarms multiple times weekly, and unresponsiveness to concerns, though others describe current staff as responsive and thoughtful. The core tension is between well-executed operations (when management is engaged) and periods where the property feels neglected despite premium pricing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Grandmarc at Westberry Place
#13
74 low data

Grandmarc at Westberry Place

4.5(175)✓ Google-verified

Most residents rate Grandmarc highly and highlight attentive leasing staff by name, a welcoming vibe, and quality common areas. Chronic fire alarm issues and occasional maintenance delays temper the experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Monticello Oaks Townhomes Apartments
#14
73

Monticello Oaks Townhomes Apartments

4.3(60)✓ Google-verified

Monticello Oaks stands out for attentive maintenance staff (Jeff named repeatedly for quick turnarounds) and a leasing team that walks prospects through options without pressure. Common areas and grounds are consistently spotless. One applicant reported being charged a $50 fee but receiving no response within the promised 24 hours; most recent reviews, however, praise Nelida and the wider team for smooth, professional interactions. The property draws praise for both its physical condition and staff demeanor. Visitors consistently mention arriving at tour appointments to find the place clean and staff ready to help. Maintenance issues get resolved quickly. The single negative review stands as an outlier among 60, suggesting either a processing error or a customer service breakdown on a particular occasion.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Candletree Apartments
#15
77

Candletree Apartments

4.1(119)✓ Google-verified

Residents stay long-term here, citing the maintenance team's professionalism and the office staff's genuine care as core reasons. Neal and Maribel stand out by name for going beyond standard leasing and payment help; groundskeepers keep the property visibly clean and the gated layout works for families seeking safety. Beyond the good-faith operations, what keeps people rooted is the blend of affordability with amenities (pool, fitness center) and proximity to the Fort Worth T Bus Line. A seven-year tenant and four-year resident both praised the stability.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
The Davis
#16
84

The Davis

4.5(452)✓ Google-verified

Living at The Davis feels like joining a community rather than renting an apartment. Staff members, particularly Marina, consistently make residents feel welcomed and cared for. Maintenance responds quickly to work orders and keeps the property clean. Amenities like the fitness center and pool are well-maintained. Long-term residents cite zero issues over years of tenancy. The quiet, relaxed vibe appeals across age groups and lifestyles. Parking can be tight in some buildings, which matters if you have multiple vehicles. Overall, the combination of responsive staff and genuine community connection sets this complex apart.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Broadstone on Trinity
#17
72

Broadstone on Trinity

4.0(315)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report strong satisfaction with the location, staff professionalism, and a maintenance team that responds quickly and goes extra lengths during repairs. Leasing staff like Karli and management earn consistent praise for friendliness and problem-solving. Mold discoveries, questionable move-out carpet charges without documented proof, and recurring fee surprises trouble a vocal minority. Window leaks and elevator breakdowns have also been noted. Pet owners especially report alarm over undocumented damage claims on move-out.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Luna Vista Apartments
#18
77

Luna Vista Apartments

4.0(215)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff at Luna Vista, particularly Karla and Kelly in the leasing office, consistently go above and beyond to support tenants through move-ins and ongoing needs. The community feels calm and welcoming, with maintenance that respects resident space and office staff who handle problems quickly and professionally. Prices range from $750 for a 500-square-foot 1-bedroom to $1,550 for a 2-bedroom townhome. The complex offers pet amenities, a playground, splash pad, and on-site maintenance, positioning it as both accessible for budget-conscious renters and attractive to families.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Providence at Marine Creek Apartment Homes
#19
75

Providence at Marine Creek Apartment Homes

4.2(262)✓ Google-verified

Office staff-especially Yolanda, Melinda, and Linda-earn consistent praise for responsiveness and professionalism. Maintenance resolves issues the same day, with technician Pablo noted for comfort and speed during major repairs. The grounds stay clean and quiet, with low package theft and neighbour conflicts. However, security enforces a 10pm-style curfew strictly, charges $50 for minor lease violations, and places trash cans far from units. Some residents report past ceiling leaks and mold issues. Buyers seeking affordable townhome-style living with reliable maintenance should find the team dependable. Those with accessibility needs or flexibility concerns should reconsider: the security rules feel oppressive to shift workers or families wanting outdoor time in vehicles, and accessibility for disabled residents appears limited.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Villas at Cantamar Apartments
#20
74

Villas at Cantamar Apartments

3.8(205)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members Jessica and Alexia stand out for going beyond the standard tour, answering questions thoroughly, and moving applications quickly without appointments. The property itself draws consistent praise for cleanliness, maintenance, and amenities like the pool and dog park, making it a welcoming option for first-time renters and families on a budget. Pricing starts around $1000 for studios and tops out near $2000 for three-bedroom units, with pet fees running $300-600 upfront and $20-40 monthly. The location in Western Hills North and gated security appeal to those seeking both affordability and a sense of community.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Monarch Pass Apartments
#21
70

Monarch Pass Apartments

4.1(1071)✓ Google-verified

Monarch Pass draws strong praise for staff warmth, particularly leasing agent Stephanie, and residents report feeling safe in a quiet setting. However, a significant minority struggle with delayed repairs, pest control failures, and laundry equipment that does not work reliably; some cite unresolved maintenance requests weeks after submission and disputes over promised rent relief.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Park at Sycamore
#22
74

Park at Sycamore

3.9(202)✓ Google-verified

Residents staying for years highlight responsive office staff (Kaci, Kelsey, Kayli, Kristen named repeatedly) and maintenance that fix problems promptly. Grounds are mowed regularly, apartments are spacious and quiet, and the community feels welcoming. One long-term resident noted inspection frequency feels invasive, though staff accommodated her concerns respectfully.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
Jameson at the Bluffs
#23
69

Jameson at the Bluffs

4.2(212)✓ Google-verified

Residents divide sharply on Jameson at the Bluffs. Supporters praise the resort-style pool, thoughtful staff (Emily, Joey, Josie, Tracy, Endy named specifically), and maintenance that typically responds within 48 hours. Detractors report persistent security gaps: broken gates, homeless encampments in the parking lot, tire theft, and property damage (black mold, flooding, collapsed ceilings) left unaddressed or charged back to tenants despite maintenance acknowledging systemic first-floor water issues. The leasing application process has frustrated returnees through third-party AI income verification (Snappt) that flags legitimate documents as fraudulent, denies employer contact, and keeps admin and application fees without refund. Renters also cite aggressive deposit withholding (charges approaching or meeting full deposit), recurring AC and pest problems, and train noise. The gap between five-star reviews from longer-term residents and one-star reviews from those departing suggests the community's appeal fades once security and maintenance shortcomings become apparent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Bowery at Southside
#24
69

The Bowery at Southside

4.2(142)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing staff earn consistent praise for personal attention and professionalism, particularly Marcella, Jackie, Raven, and Christina. Move-in transparency and online processes appeal to those with simple needs. However, management falls short once residents are in place: noise complaints go unresolved, maintenance staff misconduct was not addressed adequately, and unit cleanliness at move-in often fails to meet promises. Policy design leaves existing residents vulnerable to being passed over for unit transfers, and billing errors compound frustration. A handful report smooth year-long stays, but accountability gaps leave many feeling abandoned after signing the lease. The property markets itself across multiple categories but struggles with core tenant protection. Leasing works well; living here depends heavily on luck with neighbors, staff conduct, and how quickly management acts on complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Cortland Ridglea
#25
80

Cortland Ridglea

4.4(356)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Living here feels like stepping into a well-run operation. The leasing staff (Brooklyn, Kalli, Crystal named specifically) stay proactive and attentive, maintenance teams like Erik respond fast even on holidays, and residents consistently praise the thick walls and landscaping. The grounds are clean and safe, parking is straightforward, and the location near Tom Thumb and Sprouts works well for most. One resident moved from Phase 1 to Phase 2 and found the newer units plagued by roaches and AC issues despite similar pricing, plus pool debris and patio wildlife; management fixed what they could, but the gap between phases surprised them. Overall, the community shines because staff genuinely care and residents feel heard. Quality depends on which phase you choose. Phase 1 residents report fewer maintenance surprises and affordable pricing; Phase 2 units are newer but arrived less inspected for pests and AC. The pet amenities (bark park) and resident events matter to the culture here. Samsung appliances and energy efficiency are standard. Security is tight (police presence after incidents, regular safety emails). For families and post-grads seeking a friendly, responsive place, this works; renters sensitive to pest history or wanting guaranteed build quality should ask detailed move-in inspection questions.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Fair Park Apartments
#26
79

Fair Park Apartments

4.5(137)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Fair Park for its gated, family-friendly setting, clean grounds, and responsive staff who handle requests promptly. However, some reports document serious maintenance failures, notably months-long delays on AC repairs and pest control issues that management struggled to address.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Opal
#27
72

The Opal

4.2(121)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the peaceful setting, well-kept apartments, and attentive staff, especially Linda and Makayla in the leasing office. The maintenance team responds quickly to requests. However, thin walls mean neighbor noise is a real problem, common stairwells stay dirty despite complaints, and the 60-day move-out notice policy catches people off guard. Rent is steep for the space, and recent communication delays from the office frustrate some residents.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
Azora Ranch Apartments
#28
78

Azora Ranch Apartments

4.5(87)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the property's upkeep, strong management team, and attentive maintenance. Staff members like Brandy, Noah, and Brighton earn particular recognition for welcoming service and efficient problem-solving. The main drawback is mandatory WiFi that residents report as unreliable and costly at $150 monthly, with inconsistent office phone responsiveness.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Pavillion At Samuels
#29
68

Pavillion At Samuels

4.3(32)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the quiet neighborhood and named staff like Luis and Craig for their friendliness and quick problem-solving. Maintenance responds fast, especially Cheygen, who earns repeated mentions for courtesy and speed. However, some tenants faced serious issues: one reported apartment flooding, persistent roach problems, and noise from industrial air conditioning units; another noted the leasing office was slow to answer phones.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Monticello Apartments
#30
73

Monticello Apartments

4.1(138)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Linda and the office team earn consistent praise for welcoming newcomers and answering questions without rushing. Mario, the maintenance person, gets named multiple times for handling repair calls promptly at any hour. The complex draws long-term residents who cite quiet surroundings, safe streets, and reasonable rents. One serious complaint describes a keyed car and management's refusal to hold the resident accountable due to no camera proof, which raises a concern about how the community handles disputes between residents. The spacious one and two-bedroom layouts and patios appeal to families staying years. Pet fees run $20 monthly. Staff remain the strongest draw: reviewers repeatedly mention feeling welcomed from the leasing office tour onward. Service calls get addressed without delay.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Hunter Plaza
#31
78

Hunter Plaza

4.3(188)✓ Google-verified

Staff excellence drives positive experiences here, especially leasing agent Nadia who handles applications with transparency and speed, and maintenance crew Erin and Francisco who respond quickly to requests. One resident reported serious safety, cleanliness, and harassment concerns that management appears not to have addressed; another flagged record-keeping issues and lease documentation problems. The building shows investment in updates-new washers, working elevators, clean hallways-though older infrastructure remains. Most tenants describe a warm welcome and smooth move-in, with staff treating them as individuals rather than numbers. Common praise focuses on Nadia's personal attention during the leasing process, maintenance responsiveness, and the property's central downtown location. The facility amenities (fitness center, theatre, library, business center, garage parking) are listed but not detailed in reviews.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Avana River Park
#32
66

Avana River Park

3.9(228)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Sandra, Miimi, and Tara earn repeated praise for professionalism and responsiveness during the leasing process. The location near Walmart, shopping centers, and the Trinity River trail attracts dog owners who value the on-site dog park and pet stations. However, recent residents report persistent problems: heavy smoke from neighbors despite complaints, recurring water damage and mold requiring professional cleanup, AC units that stay broken until residents force replacement, and billing disputes after move-out. Water shutoffs and lack of insulation compound the frustration. The complex transitioned to Greystar management mid-tenancy, and some blame rising rents and communication breakdowns on that shift.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Marquis at Stonegate
#33
83

Marquis at Stonegate

4.6(197)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently report a safe, quiet community where maintenance responds within hours to overnight requests and staff build real relationships with tenants. The Trinity Trail access, proximity to shopping and dining, and well-kept pool and fitness center draw families and young professionals who renew leases; parking waitlists and lack of a playground are the main drawbacks. Dale, Kaylee, and Kate are named for their professionalism during move-ins and lease questions. Residents mention staying two years or longer, with multiple people upgrading to bigger units within the same complex rather than moving out.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Mill Stone Apartments Homes
#34
71 low data

Mill Stone Apartments Homes

4.5(58)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents speak highly of their years at Mill Stone, citing affordable rates, a quiet atmosphere, and staff warmth as reasons for staying. Some report pest problems and intermittent pool closures, while parking and gate maintenance have drawn criticism.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Encore Panther Island
#35
76

Encore Panther Island

4.3(122)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Encore Panther Island earns strong loyalty from residents who credit the staff, especially Hailey, Pam, and Angela, with genuine attentiveness and rapid problem-solving. Maintenance typically responds within one to two days; residents consistently praise the clean grounds, working pool, dog park, and walking distance to downtown Fort Worth and Trinity Trails. The experience is tempered by occasional safety concerns in the surrounding area and street noise for ground-level units on the main road. One displaced domestic violence survivor reported a billing dispute after an ex-partner damaged her door during a break-in, alleging management failed to honor verbal commitments despite having been informed of her situation from the start.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Flats at Brentwood
#36
69

Flats at Brentwood

4.1(319)✓ Google-verified

Residents credit leasing staff, particularly Isai, with smooth application and move-in support; the grounds are clean and well-kept. Yet maintenance backlogs persist: appliances stay broken for months, pest control is missing, and office phones go unanswered. Newer management is seen as focused on revenue over community care, with disputes over parking fees and lack of compensation for damage caused by maintenance itself. The best experience comes early, during leasing. Long-term living reveals gaps: broken dishwashers wait since March, rats reported, and management responsiveness has dropped noticeably since staff turnover.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Overton Park Townhome Apartments
#37
74

Overton Park Townhome Apartments

4.1(179)✓ Google-verified

Well-maintained townhomes in Southwest Fort Worth draw consistent praise for clean grounds, attentive staff, and peaceful surroundings. Rose, Leslie, Angie, and maintenance worker Max stand out for going beyond standard service, though some recent reviews flag communication lapses during leasing and occasional rudeness from maintenance personnel. The property itself earns high marks: residents note spotless parking lots, neat yards, and fresh interiors. Townhome layouts include private patios, wood-like flooring, and built-in shelving. A small set of one-star reviews raise concerns about reliability during critical transitions and attitude shifts in the maintenance team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Rio Apartments
#38
74

Rio Apartments

4.4(239)✓ Google-verified

Rio's staff, especially Jessica and Beatrice at the office, earn consistent praise for moving people in smoothly and solving problems fast. Maintenance and cleanliness get repeated positive mentions, and the complex appeals to families seeking quiet living close to stores and the freeway. However, a vocal minority reports serious issues: plumbing failures, electrical problems, bug infestations, and slow repairs. Some residents say the referral bonus was promised but never delivered. One towing incident raised concerns about security practices and communication. While most recent reviews lean positive, these complaints suggest inconsistency in upkeep and follow-through.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Bexley at Left Bank
#39
65

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(226)✓ Google-verified

Bexley at Left Bank draws sharp contrasts in resident experience. Maintenance staff, especially Erin, earn consistent praise for fast, responsive work and genuine care. Yet office communication falters: tenants report ignored calls, billing errors, and slow resolutions that require in-person visits. Sound insulation is a real problem, with neighbors' voices, music, and pets clearly audible. Rent jumps of $600-$800 after year one are steep when the same unit rents lower to new arrivals. The property offers genuinely nice amenities, a prime location, and staff who smile when they show up. But behind the attractive facade sit construction gaps, a broken garage gate in extended repair cycles, and an office that shifts into low gear once you renew. Strong maintenance and weak management make this a mixed bag: arrive with eyes open about noise, expect office friction, but know your unit repairs will get done right.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Silver Leaf Villas
#40
81

Silver Leaf Villas

4.5(331)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Silver Leaf for spotless common areas, responsive staff, and a calm atmosphere that feels secure. Several named team members (Lizbeth, Sandy, Tania, Alma) earned specific recognition for guiding tours and moves. A small minority report premium pricing and occasional scheduling mishaps at leasing, though the balance of evidence strongly favors the property.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Venue at 8651 Apartments
#41
65

Venue at 8651 Apartments

3.8(524)✓ Google-verified

Venue at 8651 earns strong marks for maintenance staff who fix issues quickly and explain problems clearly, plus clean grounds and package lockers that reviewers value. However, serious concerns emerge around unresponsive management, delays in processing transfers and refunds, pest-infested move-in units, and surprise visitor parking charges and towing policies that left tenants frustrated.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Palmer
#42
65

The Palmer

4.0(61)✓ Google-verified

The Palmer earns strong praise for friendly, responsive leasing staff and a quiet, pet-welcoming boutique community near trails and shopping. One former resident documented months of unresolved billing errors, wrongful debt collection charges, and repeated management claims to fix the issue without taking action, ultimately harming their credit and business.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Lofts at West 7th
#43
64

The Lofts at West 7th

3.7(295)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the leasing team-Shelley, Allen, Jacob, and Nicholas stood out for patience and personal attention-and note clean units and a stellar West 7th location near bars, restaurants, and Trinity Park. However, recent construction disruptions sparked frustration: night-shift workers reported demolition-level noise in adjacent units with no advance notice or help from management, who dismissed concerns as normal apartment living. One reviewer also flagged forced WiFi charges and worries about the area's future.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Villas of Eastwood Terrace
#44
74

Villas of Eastwood Terrace

4.3(159)✓ Google-verified

Most visitors praise the welcoming staff, particularly naming Brenda Reese and Keven for their attentiveness to prospective tenants and families seeking senior housing. Apartments are described as clean and well-maintained, with management noted as responsive to residents. One tenant raised concerns about selective rule enforcement and alleged disrespect from front-office staff toward older residents, plus roaming pets on the grounds.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
The Union at River East
#45
63

The Union at River East

3.7(235)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise Orlando's warmth during leasing and the maintenance team's speed when engaged, plus the pool and outdoor amenities. However, persistent problems shadow the experience: a garage gate down for months, staff hostility when residents report issues, slow administrative solutions, and billing confusion that creates unexpected charges. Some see recent improvement; others view these as core management failures.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Mercantile River District
#46
79

Mercantile River District

4.5(265)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, especially Noelle and Melissa, earn consistent five-star praise for professionalism and above-and-beyond service during tours and move-ins. Residents highlight resort-style amenities (lazy river, state-of-the-art fitness center, game room) and speedy maintenance response times. The River District location appeals to young professionals and families seeking modern finishes. However, pest control failures, unpredictable fees, and management communication gaps undercut the luxury positioning. A two-month resident reported recurring roaches, unresolved roof noise, and non-responsive staff; a three-year resident cited neglected grounds and astronomical add-ons. Dog park sanitation and parking security are secondary concerns. The experience depends heavily on leasing staff and which building you occupy.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Northwood Apartments
#47
67

Northwood Apartments

3.9(53)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Northwood has experienced a sharp turnaround since new management arrived. Jannette and her team consistently handle move-ins and resident issues quickly and personally. Visitors report a quiet neighborhood, clean grounds, and staff who know residents by name and treat them well. Tenants note rent climbs steadily, and a few long-timers remember rough periods under prior leadership. The transformation is recent but deep. Residents who had doubts before now praise the professionalism and genuine care. Families with seniors and single parents say they feel heard. A long-time tenant mentioned staying 15+ years despite reservations about past management. On-site amenities and the calm feel of the complex come up regularly.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Cobblestone Manor Senior Apartments
#48
71

Cobblestone Manor Senior Apartments

4.2(89)✓ Google-verified

Cobblestone Manor attracts families and long-term residents who value its peaceful senior living environment and genuinely helpful staff. Residents consistently praise specific technicians and office staff by name for going the extra mile, and many feel safe and cared for. However, billing errors, unresolved pest issues during tenancies, and visible aging of the complex-walls, blinds, kitchen cabinets, vents-create friction for some, particularly those with limited mobility who struggle with distance to amenities.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Aviator West 7th
#49
78

Aviator West 7th

4.3(290)✓ Google-verified

Most visitors praise the clean, well-organized property and its proximity to Montgomery Plaza shops. Staff members Leslie, Santos, Christal, and Junior consistently make tours smooth and welcoming, answering questions thoroughly and helping applicants feel confident in their decision. However, some prospective tenants report days of missed calls and no follow-up from the leasing office, with the Molly chatbot creating frustration. One applicant raised serious concerns about application handling and alleged bias. These communication gaps stand out against the generally positive leasing team experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
4000 Hulen
#50
71

4000 Hulen

4.2(242)✓ Google-verified

Staff, especially managers Robyn and Lily, earn consistent praise for going above and beyond, and maintenance typically responds within days. Spaces are move-in ready and well-maintained. However, location near train tracks brings constant squeaking and brake noise, walls let sound travel between units, and the guest parking policy (three free visits, then $4/day) frustrates residents planning gatherings. Added fees (trash valet, pest control, forced rental insurance at $16/month) compound affordability concerns despite initial pricing appeal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Village Creek
#51
66

Village Creek

3.9(263)✓ Google-verified

Move-in gets high marks when the right staff handle it, particularly a manager (Candy, mentioned repeatedly when positive) who goes out of her way and processes paperwork quickly. Once residents are in, maintenance becomes hit-or-miss: some emergency calls go unanswered for hours, AC problems linger unfixed for weeks, and responses depend heavily on which technician shows up. A staff turnover or transition appears to have caused real service gaps recently.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Taj Mahal Apartments
#52
66

Taj Mahal Apartments

3.6(101)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents have stayed for years because of genuine care from management, particularly Jackie Sevilla, and reliable maintenance crew David and Emad. The draw is bills-paid affordability near downtown, a quiet atmosphere, and staff that handle requests same-day without bureaucracy. Long-standing tenants prize the second-chance rental policy and resort pool. One resident flagged inconsistent neighbor behavior and wished for gated entry or garage parking, but these are exceptions in an overwhelmingly loyal base.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Chateau on the River Apartments
#53
77

Chateau on the River Apartments

4.6(301)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents report conflicting experiences. Some praise the Trinity Trail location, staff friendliness, and quick maintenance responses. However, multiple reviews detail years of unresolved water intrusion, mold concerns, pest problems, and repeated AC failures. One tenant required emergency room care due to a broken air conditioner left unfixed for a month. Management transitions (four in five years) appear to correlate with service decline. Newer residents often rate highly based on move-in experience, while longer-term tenants document persistent building issues, inadequate repairs, and delayed accountability. Recent one-star reviews name specific staff (Carissa, Rachel) as dismissive toward disability accommodation requests and unresponsive to urgent health and safety concerns. Positive reviews consistently highlight named leasing agents (Carissa Scott, Courtney Wells, Rachel Tribble) for move-in assistance, but these same names appear in complaints about office responsiveness to maintenance emergencies and accessibility needs.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Quail Ridge Apartments
#54
75

Quail Ridge Apartments

3.9(307)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the friendliness and professionalism of the team, particularly staff members Marco and Sebera, and report maintenance work orders are handled promptly. The property is described as clean and well-kept, with management that goes out of its way to make both new and long-term residents feel welcome.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Trinity Bell Gardens
#55
63

Trinity Bell Gardens

3.9(76)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and newcomers alike consistently praise the management team's consistency and friendliness, fast maintenance response, and beautiful grounds with active community events. The core frustration centres on thin walls that let neighbor noise bleed through, uneven parking enforcement that leaves renters without spaces despite paid rent, and move-out charges residents dispute, compounded by privacy concerns about application verification practices and complaints about service quality. Maintenance staff like Adam are named for same-day fixes. Amenities include pool, fitness room, walking trail, and monthly food trucks. However, residents with pets report high move-out carpet charges even for pre-existing damage, and those without garages struggle with first-come parking while some residents leave garages unused or park multiple vehicles.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Retreat at River Ranch
#56
70

The Retreat at River Ranch

4.1(306)✓ Google-verified

Staff at the Retreat have earned consistent praise for making move-in smooth and stress-free; April, Mackenzie, and Sterling field questions well and follow through. Yet residents face lingering frustrations: broken gates and trash systems sit unrepaired for months, maintenance requests drag out, pests have appeared in units, and parking rules stay poorly communicated (one visitor's car was towed before she knew the registration process). New management appears to be turning things around, but infrastructure problems remain.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Villas On the Hill
#57
68 low data

Villas On the Hill

4.2(98)✓ Google-verified

Early staff like Margarita and Vanessa earned strong praise for warmth and problem-solving. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management accused of poor response times, evasiveness on pricing, and mishandling of residents with disabilities and military backgrounds. The property itself remains described as clean and well-located near transit and shopping, but service reliability appears to have deteriorated.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Mariposa Park Apartments
#58
64

Mariposa Park Apartments

3.5(102)✓ Google-verified

New management under Edith and Melina has energized the community in recent months, with residents consistently noting faster issue resolution and a visible shift toward better upkeep. Staff attentiveness stands out, especially Melina's hands-on presence and Edith's professionalism, though some residents flag declining maintenance consistency and persistent security gaps like dark parking areas. The apartment complex appears to approve residents who struggle elsewhere and maintains a family-friendly atmosphere. Rafael and other maintenance staff get named for specific fixes, but one long-term resident noticed recent decline in the primary technician's work quality, and lighting infrastructure issues remain unaddressed despite repeated mentions.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Hub at Chisholm Trail
#59
69

The Hub at Chisholm Trail

3.5(345)✓ Google-verified

James Parker dominates recent five-star reviews, with renters consistently praising his attentiveness during tours, applications, and move-ins. His communication style puts nervous applicants at ease and speeds up paperwork. The community itself earns steady compliments for cleanliness, quiet grounds, and well-maintained units. Staff across the office appear accessible and patient, creating a leasing experience that feels personal rather than transactional.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Sansom Ridge Apartments
#60
64

Sansom Ridge Apartments

4.2(46)✓ Google-verified

Sansom Ridge draws strong loyalty for its affordable rents, spacious units, and standout staff members like Rosetta and Sabrina who run a food pantry and host community events. Management has failed residents during payment disputes, pest problems persist despite requests, trash accumulates around the property, and break-ins plus package theft remain unresolved despite on-site cameras. The complex excels at ground-level support but struggles with accountability at the office level. Maintenance staff like Bren'Sha earn high marks for professionalism. Quiet on the surface, the community faces underlying safety and upkeep issues that management has not addressed across multiple resident tenures.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sierra Gardens
#61
59

Sierra Gardens

3.2(203)✓ Google-verified

Sara Paz and her leasing team stand out for speed and patience; many tenants moved in within hours of applying and praise their follow-up. Units inside are fresh and grounds are quiet, but residents report weeks without hot water, unauthorized towing, loud music at night, and slow fixes for maintenance issues like rodents and AC. The complex polarizes: those handled by Sara stay happy; others face poor communication and unresolved problems.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Morningside Apartments
#62
59

Morningside Apartments

3.6(65)✓ Google-verified

Management and leasing staff, especially Maria and Juan, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and problem-solving. Recent administrative changes have notably improved resident satisfaction and maintenance responsiveness. However, recurring complaints center on aging infrastructure: pest problems, mold, leaks, and slow fixes on critical systems like heating. Some residents report year-long repair waits. The gap between enthusiastic recent reviews and older complaints suggests either real improvements underway or inconsistent execution across different maintenance issues and timeframes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District
#63
68

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

4.0(204)✓ Google-verified

Trinity Urban offers affordable apartments with genuine community spirit, though maintenance reliability and building systems are significant pain points. Staff like Juan and Kiana actively organize events that help residents connect, and pricing beats expectations for the location. Recurring complaints about non-working air conditioning, elevator outages, and delayed maintenance responses suggest operational gaps that undercut the otherwise welcoming atmosphere.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Luxia River East Apartments
#64
74

Luxia River East Apartments

4.4(552)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the leasing team (Joshua, Reggie, Victor, Josh) for patient tours and detailed explanations, and the maintenance crew (Oscar, Edgar) for quick, thorough work. Cleanliness and location near downtown draw strong compliments. Yet repeat issues plague tenants: surprise charges for short notice violations, aggressive vehicle towing that catches registered cars, units swapped on move-in day, and staff who sometimes ignore calls or seem indifferent to problems. Management has improved recently under new team members, but systemic billing traps and parking enforcement remain serious pain points. The gap between exceptional individual staff and frustrating backend policies leaves residents conflicted. Those who stay for years feel genuinely cared for; those caught in overage fees or towing cycles feel exploited. The community itself feels safe and well-designed, but the fine print and operational inconsistencies erode trust.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Sycamore Pointe Townhomes
#65
67

Sycamore Pointe Townhomes

4.4(17)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report friendly, efficient staff and quick maintenance response. Ninfa, Marcus, and KC earn consistent praise for their work ethic and personality. The office team (Linda, Aquilina, Tiffany) handle move-ins smoothly and make residents feel welcome. A significant minority, however, face serious maintenance neglect: one long-term resident reported a water leak unresolved for months, mold risk, false completion notices, and broken promises on rent relief and repairs. These contrasts suggest inconsistent follow-through on complex issues. Staff responsiveness for routine requests appears strong, but systemic problems with tracking and resolving ongoing damage merit careful consideration for anyone with potential maintenance concerns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Borough Apartments
#66
63

The Borough Apartments

3.7(196)✓ Google-verified

Residents report a stark divide between hiring and leasing staff who are genuinely helpful, and an unstable management situation that has deteriorated significantly. Multiple property managers have cycled through, leaving communication broken and maintenance issues unaddressed. Water damage recurs in several units, mold problems go unremedied, and pest infestations (roaches and rats) persist without adequate treatment. The office is frequently unreachable. Tenants with housing vouchers and good staff interactions rate highly; those facing infrastructure failures and communication blackouts rate the complex critically.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Overlook Ranch
#67
73

Overlook Ranch

4.3(233)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

New management last year has restored maintenance response and staff courtesy, with several residents praising quick fixes and welcoming leasing staff. Persistent problems shadow the experience: vehicle break-ins and lack of security cameras, billing disputes and unexplained charges, aggressive rent hikes, and a troubled gate system create friction that offsets the well-designed clubhouse.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Prescott Park Apartment Homes
#68
63

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

3.7(570)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Prescott Park divides sharply: leasing staff excel at tours and applications, and once moved in, maintenance responds quickly to repair requests. The apartments themselves offer good floor plans and affordability. But residents hit a wall after signing. Roach infestations are persistent despite regular spraying, office phones go unanswered for days, billing surprises arrive regularly (undisclosed fees, duplicate charges), and management becomes dismissive when residents ask questions or complain. The facility grounds are clean and the location near Randol Mill Park works well. Staff like Bianca, Maricela, and Alejandra earn consistent five-star praise for leasing. Yet for every welcoming tour experience, a tenant reports a rattlesnake in the living room, a week-long roof repair, uncommunicative billing, or a management team that feels "professional when they want you to sign but rude after."

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Villas at 1404 Apartments
#69
63

Villas at 1404 Apartments

3.8(163)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tenants report starkly different experiences. Half praise the leasing staff, especially Jewel and Nana, for making the sign-up smooth and responsive maintenance requests. The other half describe a gap between advertised amenities (in-unit washer/dryer, central AC, private patios) and what arrives, along with mounting hidden charges for internet, pest control, and parking. Most damaging are recurring complaints about overgrown grounds, rat and snake sightings, and untreated roach problems that persist despite pest control visits. The 3.8-star rating masks this split: 65% five-star reviews celebrate staff warmth, while 28% one-star reviews cite habitability failures. Recent reviews show ongoing AC breakdowns and grounds issues. One positive: when maintenance staff like Anthony engage fully, repairs happen quickly, but lack of support suggests staffing gaps. Affordability draws renters, but many report the advertised price masks extra charges accumulating monthly.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Caden Apartments
#70
63

Caden Apartments

3.7(269)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

First impressions count here: staff like Tony and Melanie deliver genuine warmth during tours, and some residents move through approval smoothly. But complaints cluster heavily around pest control that does not stick, maintenance delays that stretch months, and a lean crew (two maintenance workers covering a large property) that cannot keep up. Leasing decisions are also inconsistent, with residents reporting contradictory info about qualifications and income thresholds, pushing some to leave before signing.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Regency at Ridgmar
#71
62

Regency at Ridgmar

2.5(283)✓ Google-verified

New management arriving in early 2025 has reversed the complex's reputation. Residents report fast maintenance response (30 minutes to hours), newly renovated units with stone countertops, and attentive staff, especially office manager Brenda. One older complaint about a manager invading privacy suggests past problems may linger among some staff. The shift is recent enough that many long-term reviews still reflect poor prior management. Current residents consistently praise the apartment condition and value, but the low 2.5 overall rating reflects years of accumulated negative reviews. New management may need time to rebuild trust across the full resident base.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Villas at Alameda
#72
66

Villas at Alameda

3.9(182)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the leasing and maintenance teams for responsiveness and professionalism. Staff members like Tarissa, Donny, and Irving earn specific recognition for patience and problem-solving. The complex offers good value and amenities, with many tenants noting clean, quiet units on move-in. However, persistent habitability problems undermine this experience. Multiple residents report balconies and patios posing safety risks, AC units that fail to cool adequately, chronic water shutoffs with little notice, and mold from unfixed AC leaks. Repairs are described as temporary patches rather than lasting fixes. Some tenants waited months for critical issues to be addressed, with limited follow-up communication or accountability when work orders went unresolved.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Stella
#73
65

The Stella

3.8(208)✓ Google-verified

New management (MLDC) has won strong praise for responsiveness and staff professionalism, especially Ashley and Brenda, with residents noting smooth lease changes and helpful support. However, a significant portion report move-in units that were poorly cleaned despite "newly renovated" claims, persistent cigarette and marijuana odors, and ongoing cockroach and rodent issues that management has not resolved.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Jennings Place
#74
71

Jennings Place

4.4(105)✓ Google-verified

Jennings Place earns strong ratings from long-term residents and newcomers who praise the downtown location, dog park, and friendly staff members like Adrian, Perla, and Susan. Clean grounds and responsive maintenance earn mention, though recent complaints flag persistent problems: fallen branches, uncollected trash and furniture, mold in units, and delayed service work despite rising rent. Management quality varies noticeably across staff. While Adrian and Luis have won five-star praise for solving tenant issues promptly, one escalated complaint cited a manager's refusal to share corporate contact details and unwillingness to walk the grounds. Reviewers also note inconsistent maintenance staffing and that lawn care sometimes goes incomplete.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Taylor Commons
#75
62

Taylor Commons

3.6(133)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and recent arrivals consistently praise the new management team (Cory and Kamitia) for transforming the community into a quieter, more responsive place. Maintenance staff, especially Tim, resolve issues quickly and professionally. However, a small but vocal group reports vehicle break-ins, personal item theft during moves, and inconsistent staff behavior. Security and trust remain unresolved friction points that overshadow the positive operational changes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marine Creek Apartments
#76
71

Marine Creek Apartments

4.2(504)✓ Google-verified

The complex draws strong praise for front-line staff warmth and maintenance speed, with tenants citing prompt work orders and attentive management, especially managers Cecelia and Jacqueline. However, a persistent minority report serious problems: active pest infestations despite pest control calls, shoddy repairs (wood/paint patches over structural issues), mysterious fee charges that damaged credit when reported to collections, and unresolved safety concerns like broken door locks. The split between glowing long-term residents and deeply frustrated departing tenants suggests inconsistent service across departments and time. Positive experiences cluster around move-in speed, unit finishes (wood floors, granite, stainless steel), and grounds upkeep. Negative experiences concentrate on maintenance quality gaps, pest management failures, billing practices, and a sense that corporate ignores escalated complaints. Multiple reviews name responsive individuals (Cecelia, Alejandra, Ronaciel, Alexis) but also point to a lack of accountability higher up.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Terraces of Marine Creek Apartments
#77
71

Terraces of Marine Creek Apartments

3.9(150)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents consistently praise maintenance staff, particularly JJ, for solving problems quickly and with genuine care. Leasing team, especially Huseni, earns repeated mention for warmth and professionalism. The property feels quiet and clean, with newer updates like the reopened pool adding value. However, a small but serious segment reports persistent roach problems across multiple units since late 2023, plus confusion over smoking policy. While new management has improved conditions, older residents note the community has not fully recovered from past neglect. These issues affect peace of mind despite otherwise strong satisfaction.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Linwood Square
#78
61

Linwood Square

3.8(66)✓ Google-verified

Linwood Square draws mixed experiences tied to affordability and social community, though upkeep and management responsiveness remain ongoing friction points. Staff like Myra, Angelica, and Chonda earn praise for genuine care, and residents value granite counters, included utilities, and pet policies. However, complaints span dirty common areas, maintenance delays, staff professionalism issues, and record-keeping lapses that have left applicants restarts from zero.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
The Henderson
#79
61

The Henderson

3.6(270)✓ Google-verified

Split reviews reflect a property in transition. Five-star ratings highlight staff care (especially Linda's hands-on leasing) and working amenities, while one- and two-star reviews document ongoing infrastructure issues: water damage, mold, pest infestations, and slow repairs. A new management team has made gains recently, but charge disputes, collections hassles, and loose enforcement of community standards linger from prior transitions. Location and amenities draw residents; upkeep and consistency hold them back.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Sunset Pointe Apartments
#80
59

Sunset Pointe Apartments

3.3(209)✓ Google-verified

Sunset Pointe draws strong praise for its staff warmth and apartment appearance, yet the community is sharply divided by persistent maintenance failures and management unresponsiveness. Residents report urgent repairs left unaddressed for months, unexpected charges for items management should cover, and poor follow-up on complaints, while a vocal subset describe feeling unheard and mistreated. The business maintains resort-style amenities on paper (pool, play area, cafe) but reviewers say these often remain closed or underused. Staff turnover compounds problems: maintenance disappears mid-job, office personnel change constantly, and urgent calls go unanswered. One long-term resident raised concerns about discrimination and questioned recent rating improvements, citing systemic neglect that worsened after 2023.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sansom Pointe Senior
#81
60

Sansom Pointe Senior

3.7(99)✓ Google-verified

Sansom Pointe Senior draws residents with low rent and daily activities, but living here means battling roaches, broken elevators, and smoke drifting from neighboring units despite the advertised non-smoking policy. Management largely ignores complaints; while event coordinator Sabrina earns consistent praise, the office itself stays behind closed doors and fails to address the core maintenance and pest control issues that have pushed many residents out within months.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Find an apartment in affordable & low-income housing in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info
Laurel Heights at Cityview
#82
69

Laurel Heights at Cityview

3.8(361)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the responsive maintenance team and genuinely welcoming staff, citing fast problem-solving and personal attention. Leasing staff like Brittany and Courtney stand out for patience and clarity. Recent fixes to gates and water issues have resolved earlier frustrations. However, parking tow incidents and confusing move-in fees have left some frustrated, and newer office staff sometimes give conflicting information.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Dunmore Apartments
#83
58

Dunmore Apartments

3.2(151)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half of reviewers praise the staff and affordability, but the other half report serious problems: slow repairs (holes unfixed for months), surprise fees at move-out, and electrical issues. Long-term residents note management churn, rising rent, and safety concerns from unsupervised vandalism and occasional gunshots. Staff names like Yara and Luevenia get kudos for helpfulness, yet unanswered calls and ignored application inquiries suggest inconsistent response.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
Residences at Eastland
#84
62 low data

Residences at Eastland

3.7(115)✓ Google-verified

Management quality varies sharply. When engaged, property managers like Andria earn strong praise for attentiveness. However, staffing gaps, slow maintenance response, and selective rule enforcement undermine trust. Location and cleanliness are noted positives.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Firestone at West 7th
#85
70

Firestone at West 7th

4.1(539)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team delivers standout service during move-in, and individual maintenance workers respond fast to requests. Downtown location and walkability draw praise, but the property shows its age: windows leak, AC fails repeatedly, and the emergency response disappoints in summer heat. Residents report inconsistent policy enforcement and a shift toward rowdier tenant mixes that management hasn't addressed. Genuine resident feedback diverges sharply from some clustered reviews mentioning specific staff; one tenant suspects fake positive posts from non-residents. The core trade-off is smooth leasing experience against ongoing building maintenance and neighbor quality struggles that seasoned residents find intolerable despite the location appeal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Park 7
#86
70

Park 7

4.1(61)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Park 7 residents consistently praise the responsiveness and warmth of staff, particularly recent management changes. Brooke, Camryn, and maintenance staff (Heath, Juan) earned repeated praise for solving problems quickly and communicating clearly. The location near downtown and West 7th, clean grounds, and upgraded units draw multiple mentions. One resident reported months-long delays on a broken key and a missing key for a new household member, plus confusion about advertised 24/7 package management. Most five-star reviewers note improvement under the new management team.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Ramble & Rose
#87
69

Ramble & Rose

4.2(181)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Brittney and Savanah are consistently praised for their knowledge and care during tours and applications. However, move-in delays, communication breakdowns during the leasing process, and a management shift in December have created serious frustration. Once residents move in, complaints center on slow maintenance responses (sometimes months), unannounced unit entries, and noisy neighbors that management dismisses rather than resolves. Security deposits have been illegally withheld for normal wear and tear. The units themselves remain attractive, but operational and administrative failures are driving long-term residents away. The property struggles with inconsistent execution beyond the leasing office. Hallways, elevators, and common areas report cleaning issues. Utility shutoffs happen with minimal notice. Construction on the south side creates ongoing access problems. Staff are often described as friendly in person but unable or unwilling to follow through on promises. Residents who have stayed longer (2-3 years) cite recent management changes as the source of decline.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Stallion Pointe Apartments
#88
57

Stallion Pointe Apartments

3.4(144)✓ Google-verified

Stallion Pointe's Resident Services team earns consistent praise for genuine support, from helping non-residents find resources to running food pantry and community events. Staff like Casey Williams and Sabrena Butler are named repeatedly for going far beyond basic help. Maintenance problems tell a darker story. Multiple residents report A/C failures lasting weeks or months, mold in units, roach infestations, and emergency calls that go unanswered. One resident's apartment sat at 55 degrees during a freeze with no response. Another endured a water-damaged ceiling marked "in progress" for months with no work done. The leasing staff care, but management appears unable or unwilling to enforce repairs.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
500 Flats
#89
58

500 Flats

2.9(169)✓ Google-verified

Luke Kelly and Lisa Evans earn consistent praise for patient, professional leasing support and go-the-extra-mile help during move-in; several long-term residents highlight their responsive style. However, a significant portion of reviews document serious physical failures: roach infestations, weeks-long HVAC breakdowns in summer heat, maintenance requests marked complete but unresolved, and a recent electrical fire that left residents evacuated with no alternative housing offered for weeks and no rent relief. The split between five-star and one-star reviews (41% vs 50%) reflects two distinct experiences: approval and move-in handled well by office staff, but the unit itself and maintenance fall short of promised standards. One resident with a medical heat sensitivity received inadequate cooling despite flagging her condition. Another paid 1400 monthly for an old apartment with broken appliances and no amenities.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
Briella Fort Worth Apartments
#90
59

Briella Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(384)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth masks deep maintenance gaps. Residents praise Crystal, Yanira, and office team for genuine attentiveness during move-in, yet follow-through erodes fast. Appliance repairs drag on, water damage goes unresolved for years, and pest control requests are ignored despite tenant fees. Some residents thrive; others report needing city code compliance to force action.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Ironwood Crossing Apartments & Townhomes
#91
59

Ironwood Crossing Apartments & Townhomes

3.4(277)✓ Google-verified

New management has turned operations around with visible property improvements, responsive maintenance, and staff like Elena, Dana, and Charles earning repeated praise for going above and beyond. However, some residents report ongoing construction delays, garbage overflow, and uneven service quality; affordability keeps residents anchored despite these gaps.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
South 400 Apartments
#92
69

South 400 Apartments

3.9(145)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the maintenance team's speed and professionalism, particularly Joan, who has built a reputation for quick fixes and genuine care. Staff at all levels (leasing, front office, grounds) are consistently described as friendly and responsive, and common areas are well-maintained. The pool and gym are well-regarded. However, package theft is rampant due to an unguarded external mailroom, and some residents report security lapses (broken elevators, open garage gates). Move-in procedures lack coordination. Some describe the community as unsafe and dirty despite the strong staff presence. The contrast between excellent personal service and systemic security failures defines the mixed experience here.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Mason Apartment Homes
#93
60

The Mason Apartment Homes

3.6(173)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Mason has a polarized track record. When staff like Cory, Ayla, and Marissa engage, residents report helpful service. But structural mold, roach infestations, slow repairs, management churn, and move-in chaos dominate the complaints. Rent starts affordably, yet surprise fees and costly towing practices offset the price advantage. Reviewers cite a property in decline over the past 18 months.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingSenior & 55+ Living
La Hacienda Apartments
#94
58

La Hacienda Apartments

3.0(303)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviewers consistently praise staff members Izme, Janet, and manager Reyna for guiding them through applications, renewals, and move-ins with patience and care. Work orders are handled promptly, and shown units are clean. However, the 3.0 average hides a sharp divide: 45% of all reviews are one or two stars, suggesting persistent problems for a significant portion of residents that these recent positive reviews do not capture.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
Shady Oaks Manor Apartments
#95
62

Shady Oaks Manor Apartments

3.9(39)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report genuine contentment, with many praising staff member Ana and the office team for their care and responsiveness. Work orders get handled quickly, and long-term residents cite peace and community. But parking problems (potholes and excessive speed bumps) frustrate drivers, rent prices draw concern, and at least one serious resident dispute over tenant relations and possession access has left lasting damage to trust.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Life at Westland Estates
#96
59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(190)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Positive experiences center on Natisha and Amanda, who earn consistent praise for patience, availability, and going beyond the lease process. Maintenance under Fabian responds quickly and handles repairs correctly. The apartments themselves are spacious and amenities work well when accessible. However, persistent complaints about roach infestations, non-functional gates, and limited gym access overshadow these strengths. Safety issues like package theft and unruly tenant behavior concern some residents. The gap between five-star and one-star reviews reflects a stark divide: those who encounter engaged management praise it highly, while others face pest problems and poor front-desk responsiveness.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Huntley
#97
69

The Huntley

4.1(163)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Shoni and Jai earn consistent praise for attentive, personable service. New tenants find the amenities and finishes impressive. But persistent complaints span thin walls, repeated theft despite cameras, dirty common spaces, and management's failure to address safety issues like trespassing and indecent exposure. Long-term residents report significant decline since a recent management changeover.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Cobble Hill
#98
58

Cobble Hill

3.5(125)✓ Google-verified

Half the reviews praise staff warmth and cleanliness, while the other half describe years of roaches, ignored maintenance requests, and communication breakdowns. A new manager (Devin) appears to have energized the office, but older complaints about pest control failures, selective staff responsiveness, and management indifference to tenant hardship remain vivid. Long-term residents in back buildings reported infestation since move-in and no rent relief despite forced relocations. For those on tight budgets, affordability and some genuine staff support exist, but the pest history and inconsistent management raise real questions about habitability and fair treatment. Newer arrivals under current leadership report better experiences than older tenants.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Silversage Point at Western Center
#99
57

Silversage Point at Western Center

3.3(108)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent tenants and prospective renters praise staff warmth and quick repairs under strong management, but many long-term residents report chronic failures: leaks go unfixed for months, roaches persist despite complaints, and management changes so often that follow-up work stops. The property appears livable under stable leadership but unstable when the office turnover returns.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Villas by the Park Apartments
#100
67

Villas by the Park Apartments

4.1(199)✓ Google-verified

Staff earn consistent praise for warmth and responsiveness, with property manager Sara and leasing associate Kate named repeatedly as standout contributors. Maintenance work typically completes within one to two days for routine requests. Safety and upkeep stand as the core tension. Reviewers report vehicle break-ins and theft, a broken front gate left unfixed for years, roaches, and common areas (grounds, dumpster, playground) falling into disrepair. Emergency repairs stall for weeks or months. Some tenants wait months for leak fixes; others face move-in units with broken air conditioning and missing bathroom fixtures. Advertised amenities like the pool and clubhouse rarely or never open.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Highland Park Apartments
#101
61

Highland Park Apartments

3.7(91)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Daisy, Kenda, and Savannah earn consistent praise for patience and attention to detail, and the quiet location near The Shops at Clearfork appeals to many residents. However, maintenance responsiveness is deeply inconsistent: some tenants report timely fixes, while others describe months of ignored requests for pest control, water damage, and mold remediation. Staff tone varies sharply, from welcoming to curt. Move-out deposit disputes and safety concerns about narrow stairs add friction.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Mercantile Square
#102
57

Mercantile Square

2.8(224)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance standout Mr. Carlos earns serious praise, and some residents report a welcoming leasing office and decent prices for income-restricted units. However, the majority describe a troubled experience: slow or absent management response to maintenance and noise complaints, persistent roach infestation despite frequent cleaning, surprise fees and payment issues, broken promises about specials and security, and long-closed amenities residents paid for. Noise from neighbors and poor ground upkeep compound the frustration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Crosby Apartments
#103
57

The Crosby Apartments

3.2(202)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Two very different experiences emerge: staff members Tyler and Jessica earn consistent praise for patience, responsiveness, and going beyond standard assistance, and some residents report smooth move-ins and active community life. However, deep infrastructure problems dominate complaints: windows that leak for months without repair, persistent mold in bathrooms, failing AC units, widespread roaches and gnats, and a surrounding area marked by gunshots and drug activity. Multiple residents describe communication breakdowns post-lease and maintenance that drags on or never completes.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
McCart Apartments
#104
61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
HomeTowne At Matador Ranch
#105
60

HomeTowne At Matador Ranch

4.0(68)✓ Google-verified

Seniors and retirees consistently praise the quiet setting, supportive office staff (Shannon and Gracie named repeatedly), and friendly community. Activities keep residents engaged. However, recent concerns around slow maintenance, a faulty fire alarm system, and unruly upstairs neighbors undermine the safety and comfort the community otherwise promises. Parking and gate security also needs attention.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Oak Ridge Apartments
#106
60 low data

Oak Ridge Apartments

4.0(21)

New owners transformed the complex with security upgrades, lighting, and fresh grounds. Residents praise fast maintenance, quiet atmosphere, and grounds upkeep, though limited recent feedback makes current conditions unclear.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Sunset Heights Apartments
#107
57

Sunset Heights Apartments

3.5(51)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Bree and Tiarra earn genuine praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, and the location draws people who value proximity to downtown and quiet surroundings. However, persistent pest issues (roaches, fleas), sluggish maintenance response, frequent management changes, and complaints about noise and poorly maintained grounds undercut the experience for many long-term residents. Expect inconsistency.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Griffin Apartments
#108
66

The Griffin Apartments

3.9(203)✓ Google-verified

Staff stars like Christina and Angel earn repeat praise for going beyond expectations during moves and repairs. Many residents report swift, professional help with maintenance and leasing. However, a substantial block of recent arrivals encountered serious move-in problems: roaches, mold, broken appliances, and dirty units. Several complaints cite unresponsive management, ignored maintenance requests, and deposit disputes where the complex allegedly kept money despite approval policy reversals. One tenant faced documented code violations that were never repaired during tenancy.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Reserve at Quebec
#109
59

Reserve at Quebec

3.0(206)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the maintenance crew, particularly Tony and Luis, for going above and beyond on repairs and staying professional under pressure. The community feels peaceful and welcoming to many. However, a significant subset reports major frustration: months-long delays on promised repairs, office staff making commitments they don't keep, and serious water damage and mold being dismissed as "still livable" rather than addressed. The experience varies sharply depending on whether you encounter responsive maintenance or unresolved maintenance requests. Office staff like Melisa and the move-in team win praise for their warmth and efficiency. Yet communication breaks down on complex issues, leaving residents without updates or timelines. Management appears stretched or inconsistent in how it handles problems across the property.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Handley Oaks Apartments
#110
59

Handley Oaks Apartments

4.0(58)✓ Google-verified

Front office staff, particularly Norma and Lupita, earn consistent praise for attentiveness during the leasing process and willingness to work with non-traditional income. However, multiple recent reviews document severe roach infestations management has not resolved despite work orders and pest control visits, with some tenants reporting conditions worsened after treatment.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sansom Bluff Apartments
#111
60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(195)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff splits sharply: residents consistently praise the buildings, pool, and events, especially when dealing with named staff like Kasundra, Rosetta, or Hunter. The complex struggles with management turnover and office professionalism. Multiple tenants report rudeness from current office staff, trouble reaching leasing by phone, and suddenly higher rents with added charges; one resident reported roach infestation and unresolved water quality complaints since move-in. The property attracts families and pet owners drawn to its spacious units and grounds. Quality hinges entirely on which staff member handles your request: beloved individuals like Rosetta and Hunter get five-star praise for responsiveness and care, while recent office transitions have left others frustrated by dismissive, evasive management and communication breakdowns.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Steeplechase Apartments
#112
59

Steeplechase Apartments

3.6(134)✓ Google-verified

Many residents praise staff warmth and unit renovations, particularly highlighting manager Deborah's responsiveness and the property's grounds. A significant minority report serious problems: monthly car break-ins, uncontrolled roaches, broken mailboxes, and a non-functional security gate, alongside complaints that prices don't match the living conditions and that management dismisses or retaliates against complaints. The split is stark and recent. Five-star reviews consistently mention fast maintenance response, spacious renovated units, and a quiet community feel. One-star reviewers who have stayed longer (a year to 25 years) describe deteriorating security, pest issues, and feeling trapped by lease terms, suggesting quality varies sharply by unit or timing.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Burnett Lofts
#113
60

Burnett Lofts

3.6(115)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents credit Burnett Lofts for its walkable downtown position, well-appointed apartments, and a capable maintenance team led by Derrick. The leasing staff (particularly Kayla, Landon, and Sarah) receive consistent praise for professionalism and attentiveness. A management change in spring 2025 is noted as turning around prior service gaps. However, older reviews and recent comments reveal persistent friction: the parking garage gate has repeatedly failed, leaving cars vulnerable to break-ins; callers struggle to reach the leasing office; and move-out security deposit disputes have stretched months without resolution. Noise from neighbors and delayed HVAC fixes appear in multiple accounts. New management has improved maintenance responsiveness, but office accessibility and security remain contentious.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Tides at Eastchase Apartments
#114
59

Tides at Eastchase Apartments

3.0(285)✓ Google-verified

When maintenance responds, residents praise quick fixes and standout staff like Jonathan and Andrea. The gap widens with ignored repair requests: A/C leaks cause ceiling damage, dog waste goes uncollected for months, and office closures leave emergencies unaddressed. Rent attracts residents, but management churn and inconsistent follow-through have driven long-time tenants away. Staff quality is uneven but capable. Individual team members earn strong loyalty, yet the wider operation struggles with work order tracking and accountability. New residents report smooth moves; those fighting unresolved issues for weeks or months report feeling abandoned.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Foundry
#115
56

The Foundry

3.0(94)✓ Google-verified

Half of reviewers praise the office team-especially manager Mary and leasing consultant Kristi-for attentive service and quick maintenance response. They highlight a clean, quiet community with functional amenities. The other half report months-long maintenance backlogs, pervasive roach infestations despite pest control, non-functional laundry equipment, and failures to address water damage and mold. Pool hours consistently do not match posted times. Recent five-star reviews center on staff personality and responsiveness; one-star reviews span infrastructure failures, pest neglect, and inadequate emergency protocols. A three-year resident reports individual positive experiences with efficient management but acknowledges the pest and guest-parking issues others describe. The gap between best and worst experiences is stark.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marine Park Apartments
#116
59 low data

Marine Park Apartments

3.7(76)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff receive consistent praise for professionalism and attentiveness, with several reviewers naming Cecelia, Alejandra, Kaira, Denasia, and others for going above and beyond during the application and tour process. Yet residents report severe soundproofing issues, an 8pm noise curfew, and past administrative lapses that left someone without housing after a family death.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Crest Centreport Apartments
#117
55

Crest Centreport Apartments

1.9(146)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Months of waiting for repair requests, roaches thriving despite monthly pest control charges, and staff entering units without warning or notice define tenant experience here. The affordable rent attracts budget-conscious renters, but most feel trapped by hidden fees, ignored maintenance problems, and a leasing office more focused on charges than solutions.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Slate at Fort Worth Apartments
#118
59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(112)✓ Google-verified

New management since February 2026 has revitalized the property with rapid repairs, remodeling, and reopened amenities like the pool. Meshun Davis, the current manager, receives consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, reviews from 2023 to 2024 reveal a troubled history of roach infestations, security deposit withholding, communication breakdowns, and unclean units under previous ownership.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Spanish Village Apartments
#119
54

Spanish Village Apartments

2.8(51)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent reviews show improvement under new management, particularly manager Maria. Office staff and maintenance teams earn consistent praise for friendliness and speed. However, a deep split remains: cleanings are incomplete, some repairs drag, past management issues linger in older complaints, and pest problems surface in multiple reviews. The complex suits budget-conscious renters in a quiet pocket, but the track record is uneven.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Horizons at Sunridge
#120
58

Horizons at Sunridge

3.0(202)✓ Google-verified

Strong maintenance staff and office team loyalty shine through, but systematic building neglect and pest management failures undermine the experience. Reviewers praise Juan and the front desk crew for responsiveness, yet struggle with unresolved mold, doors that won't close, roaches despite constant spraying, and a management that prioritizes cosmetic landscaping over unit repairs. Rent hikes and long wait times (sometimes 10 days) test patience; those most satisfied live without structural problems.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Renaissance Gardens
#121
64

Renaissance Gardens

3.7(192)✓ Google-verified

Strong office staff and recent management improvements keep long-term residents happy, but new tenants frequently encounter unit condition gaps and pest control struggles. Nelly and Lilia earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine effort. The property has modernized under new leadership, yet maintenance delays on critical issues (infestation, broken AC, plumbing) frustrate tenants seeking better living conditions. Quality varies sharply between what prospective renters see during tours and what they receive at move-in. Roach and gnat problems persist despite requests for treatment. A three-year resident notes work orders are now fixed promptly, but newer tenants report weak pest control responses and weeks-long waits for repairs.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Ryan Apartments
#122
59

The Ryan Apartments

3.4(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong staff like Cory and Chasity deliver seamless leasing and quick maintenance for many residents, earning consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness. Yet the complex struggles with systemic issues: pest infestations ignored by management, safety problems (gunshots, break-ins), and surprise fees that surface after move-in. Some long-term residents have watched conditions decline sharply over the past year. The dog park and fitness center appeal to those who prioritize amenities, but the management overhaul has not yet won back tenants facing AC failures and unresolved building maintenance.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Candle Chase Apartments
#123
53 low data

Candle Chase Apartments

3.4(83)

Staff like Angela earn consistent praise for friendliness and responsiveness, and many residents find the rent affordable. However, major maintenance issues (flooding, cooling, roof leaks) persist unresolved for months, repairs take multiple visits, and past billing errors by management have trapped tenants in eviction disputes.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
The Holt on Chisholm Trail
#124
58

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

3.1(420)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth masks systemic property failures. Leasing agents like Arthur, Amanda, and Crystal earn consistent praise, and Eric excels at repairs when he reaches your unit. But residents endure months without AC or heat, abandoned work orders, poor communication from management, and amenities like the pool that never open despite rent that climbs mid-lease. With only two maintenance workers for a sprawling complex, the operation buckles under its own size.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Mesa Vista Apartments
#125
62

Mesa Vista Apartments

4.1(51)✓ Google-verified

Most recent tenants praise Hugo, the manager, and the maintenance team for fast repairs and genuine tenant care. The community feels safe and quiet, with well-kept grounds. However, older reviews flag serious pest problems (cockroaches, bedbugs) that management failed to resolve, plus parking issues and limited pool access, raising questions about whether management improvements address all residents fairly.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Patriot Pointe Apartments
#126
57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Garden Gate Apartments
#127
52

Garden Gate Apartments

3.2(110)✓ Google-verified

Garden Gate delivers sharply divided experiences: some residents report staying years and finding staff responsive to repairs, but a large group describes a complex plagued by slow maintenance, management dishonesty, and safety concerns. Chronic issues include water damage that spreads mold, cracks that go unrepaired despite inspections, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, and aggressive towing of guest vehicles. Multiple residents say management denied knowledge of reported problems, charged them for damages after move-out, or threatened eviction over minor infractions. The controversial guest parking policy charges residents $22 per visit after two free visits, isolating vulnerable populations including seniors and single parents.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
Vega Place Apartments
#128
57 low data

Vega Place Apartments

4.0(10)✓ Google-verified

Recent visitors find the grounds peaceful and staff welcoming, though one long-standing complaint from a decade ago raises serious flags about management professionalism, resident safety, and arbitrary rule changes. Current experience may differ.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Everly Plaza
#129
62 low data

Everly Plaza

4.5(16)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews (2-4 years old) praise the quiet, clean setting and manager Tammy's welcoming approach. A one-star review from two months ago reports serious issues: bedbug infestation, trespassing, drug activity, theft of medication packages, and disruptive neighbors. The reviewer notes staff did little to address these problems.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Hulen Park Place Townhomes
#130
62

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

3.8(101)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Hulen Park Place is deeply divided. Long-term residents praise its quiet layout and occasional responsive maintenance, but recent reviews describe chronic flooding, pest infestations, and a manager perceived as dismissive and difficult. The gap between five-star and one-star accounts suggests either significant recent deterioration or sharply different treatment by staff. Move-in conditions have disappointed renters, with dirty units and broken systems; one tenant reported an unusually fast resolution after initial complaint. Security deposit disputes and office inaccessibility frustrate tenants trying to resolve routine matters. The maintenance staff itself draws consistent praise, but management's willingness to prioritise repairs appears inconsistent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Historic Electric Building Apartments
#131
62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
West Wind Apartments
#132
53

West Wind Apartments

3.0(123)✓ Google-verified

West Wind is cheap and sometimes feels like home, but the reality is grim. Multiple reviewers document roach invasions that recur despite pest control, aggressive towing for minor infractions, sudden mold discovery post-move-in, and management that pressures tenants but dodges their complaints. Move-out charges appear inflated. Trust hinges on getting everything in writing and recording conversations.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Crestwood Place Apartments
#133
53

Crestwood Place Apartments

3.5(83)✓ Google-verified

Crestwood Place draws praise for rare staff members like Michele and Joannah who deliver genuine care, and its low rents appeal to budget-conscious tenants. Yet the overwhelming experience is neglect: roaches, leaking fixtures, sewage odors, and units painted over decades go unaddressed for months. Management has cycled through multiple companies; office hours shrink while fees grow. Long-time residents report a sharp decline since 2023, with the property rumored for redevelopment as 55+ senior housing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Magnolia Park Apartments
#134
60

Magnolia Park Apartments

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Magnolia Park divides sharply: 72% of reviewers praise responsive staff, swift maintenance, and the West 7th location; leasing associates Camryn, Brooke, and Rikki are named repeatedly for going beyond move-in basics. However, 22% report persistent soundproofing failures in upper floors (units 302, 304 especially), and one recent guest with a service animal was fined $500, indicating management shifts that contradict earlier pet-friendly reputation. The complex handles maintenance within 24 hours and accommodates tenants thoughtfully, yet noise complaints span years unresolved and rent is cited as high relative to downtown options.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Columbia Renaissance Square Senior Residences
#135
60 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square Senior Residences

4.2(19)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the clean apartments, spacious layouts, and attentive management (particularly manager Kisha and maintenance staff Darrell). Recurring problems include chronic parking shortages for residents, a main elevator down for over two months with unclear repair timeline, and declining grounds upkeep. Service quality varies based on recency: earlier reviews glowed; recent visits note deterioration.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Eastbank at Waterside
#136
60

Eastbank at Waterside

3.5(195)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff in the leasing office, especially Daisy, Samantha, and Martin, earn consistent praise for patience and helpfulness during the apartment search. The location near Trinity Trails, shopping, and highways appeals to residents, and many who have stayed long-term report clean grounds and timely maintenance work overall. However, management (identified as Catherine and Samantha in supervisory roles) faces repeated complaints about poor communication, inconsistency, and lack of follow-through. Residents report unresolved issues like flooding, mold, excessive pet waste in hallways, and questionable move-out charges that required disputes to overturn. The gap between the leasing team's professionalism and management's handling has driven departures.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Haven at Chisholm Trail
#137
60

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

3.5(458)✓ Google-verified

Tenants split sharply on The Haven at Chisholm Trail. Office staff and maintenance teams earn consistent praise for patience and responsiveness, and early move-in flexibility stands out. However, serious safety concerns dominate lower ratings: residents report management's failure to evict a tenant accused of assault, wrongful eviction filings after payment issues, and a pattern of ignored maintenance requests. Communication gaps and damage dispute charges add to tenant frustration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Axis Waterfront
#138
59

Axis Waterfront

3.0(297)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for speed and patience, with Jaelyn Tucker, Henry, and Treena mentioned by name across multiple five-star reviews. Maintenance responds quickly and after-hours. Living conditions tell a different story: residents report recurring water outages, ant and gnat invasions, trash collection failures despite paying premium rent, and concerns about gate security and how maintenance enters units. The split mirrors the rating spread: people love the signing process and immediate staff interaction, but ongoing operational issues create regret among long-term residents. One reviewer in a loft noted plumbing delays and disputed charges; another cited rodent problems tied to missed valet trash service and no Regional Manager follow-up.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Maxwell Apartments
#139
60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(337)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff Alice and manager Veronica consistently earn praise for friendliness and thorough help during tours and move-in, making the application process smooth and welcoming for most applicants. However, residents report significant gaps once they move in: emergency maintenance responds slowly even in heat emergencies, repair requests languish unresolved (AC, dishwashers, rotting wood), and some face pest infestations and noise from other units. Disputes over deposit retention and application fee practices appear in multiple complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Alton Park Apartments
#140
50

Alton Park Apartments

3.3(74)✓ Google-verified

Alton Park has a split identity: the best reviews praise staff like Ms. Alexis and Ms. Charlene for going above and beyond during move-in, and tenants note nice patios and grounds. Most reviews, however, describe an overwhelming pattern of mismanagement. Application processing stretched months with shifting requirements and incomplete guidance, leading some applicants to homelessness. Current residents report unresponsive maintenance for serious issues (broken refrigerators with pests, non-working AC, fire-hazard wiring), retaliation from managers, an unstaffed office that rarely answers calls, and amenities like the pool closed during work hours. Rent increases applied to income-restricted units add to the frustration.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Brittany Apartments
#141
54

The Brittany Apartments

3.4(298)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents report a sharp divide: staff like Nana, DeLa, and Asia earn genuine praise for warmth and professionalism in the office, but infrastructure problems dominate the experience. Water outages, heating failures, and plumbing issues recur monthly, with maintenance taking days or weeks to respond and often lacking parts. Residents face bills over $300 for utilities tied to building failures they do not control, unclear pest control service, and an AI phone system that frustrates callers trying to reach management. One long-term resident escaped after rates jumped from $1,200 to $1,600 monthly. The office team's attentiveness stands out starkly against neglected grounds (trash, unmaintained trees, acorns on walkways) and unresolved maintenance backlogs. Reviewers note a pattern of management turnover and promise a shift toward better conditions, but repeated failures across water systems, parking enforcement, and pest response persist. Walking in to speak face-to-face with staff appears more effective than calling or using the digital channels.

Student HousingSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Beach Street Center
#142
47 low data

Beach Street Center

5.0(3)✓ Google-verified

Limited review evidence. One five-star review notes a positive experience. The business operates as an insurance and commercial space provider, not a traditional apartment complex.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing
The Franklin at Samuels Avenue
#143
59

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

3.3(245)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff receive consistent praise for friendliness and attentiveness during tours, and the downtown location near Sundance Square appeals to prospective residents. However, actual tenants report serious problems: AC failures lasting weeks even in extreme heat, maintenance delays, unreturned calls and emails, security breaches (unlocked building entrances, stolen packages and vehicle parts), filthy common areas, and management billing disputes. Staff inconsistency and documentation errors compound resident frustration; many long-term tenants report years of unresolved issues and repeated fee disputes. The disconnect between the leasing experience and tenant reality is stark. While some technicians (Bryce, Miguel, Tyler) receive individual praise, the broader operation struggles with accountability. Move-in units often lack basic readiness, emergency repairs take days despite heat exceeding 90 degrees, and management rarely responds to escalations. Residents note a pattern of management turnover that leaves lease discrepancies unresolved and documentation poorly handled.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Normandale Place Apartments
#144
50 low data

Normandale Place Apartments

3.8(14)✓ Google-verified

Normandale Place draws strong praise for safety and staff warmth, but recent reviews flag serious concerns: renters report being shown clean sample units then moved to deteriorated ones at higher rent once leases are signed. The property's grey cinderblock design leaves some residents feeling the space does not match its marketing promise of dignity.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Sorrento
#145
54

Sorrento

3.4(420)✓ Google-verified

Sorrento splits sharply between positive leasing encounters and poor day-to-day living conditions. Staff members like Gia, Beth, and Lily receive praise for professionalism and warmth during move-in, but once residents settle in, maintenance delays dominate complaints. Multiple reviewers waited weeks for AC repairs, six months for dryer vent fixes, and months for water damage recovery. Security failures-broken gates and unresolved vehicle thefts-compound frustration. Communication collapses across channels: phone lines go unanswered, emails are ignored, and management changes (from Knightvest to Greystar to BH to BHLife) correlate with deteriorating conditions. Noise, weed smoking, mold, and inflated utility bills remain unaddressed despite repeated requests. The property's reputation has decayed steeply under recent management. Long-term residents note a clear shift downward; early positives (fitness center, pool, attached garages) become hollow promises when gates fail to function "more than two days total" and pools close indefinitely for repair. Residents describe outdated units, ruined belongings (AC fluid damage, clothing stained by secondhand smoke), and feeling trapped paying premium rent for broken infrastructure. The single bright spot-a third-party contractor who fixed multiple issues in one visit-underscores that management itself is the bottleneck.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Siddons Place Apartments
#146
57

Siddons Place Apartments

3.8(25)✓ Google-verified

Many tenants have stayed for years, citing friendly staff and decent floor plans. But recurring problems like roaches, a pool that rarely opens, and disputes over deposits and utility costs frustrate residents. The complex is undergoing demolition and rebuild.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Crest at River District Apartments
#147
58 low data

Crest at River District Apartments

3.7(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Modern apartments in River District with a strong location near restaurants and trails, but experiences vary sharply. Five-star reviewers praise Carlos and maintenance speed; one-star users report pest problems, delayed repairs, and unclear ESA accommodation policies.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Spur Canyon Apartments
#148
53

Spur Canyon Apartments

3.3(322)✓ Google-verified

Spur Canyon's 3.3 rating masks a sharp divide: five-star tours with leasing agent Jermaine contrast starkly against relentless one-star complaints from residents. Renters report catastrophic maintenance failures, with unit flooding unrepaired for weeks despite multiple requests, AC inoperable in summer heat, and bathroom water damage exposing interior ceiling structures. Raccoons nest in walls and attics, roaches and gnats infest units, and rotten exterior wood with exposed rusty nails creates safety hazards. Management avoids accountability, the emergency maintenance line does not work, and residents describe unanswered calls and runaround denials of lease termination. Fees climb unexpectedly ($192 in surprise charges noted), and trash accumulates visibly across parking lots. Staff member Amelia received isolated praise for follow-through, but the overwhelming pattern is unlivable conditions masked by promotional photos reviewers called fraudulent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Columbia Renaissance Square
#149
56 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Residents report standout staff members who respond quickly and organize weekly events, but persistent pest problems, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, and inconsistent maintenance undercut the experience. Some praise the move-in condition and fitness amenities; others cite unprepared temp workers and a six-year decline in upkeep.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Mylo Apartment Homes
#150
57

Mylo Apartment Homes

3.6(439)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Nancy, Susan, Kyle, and Jason earn consistent praise for friendliness and quick service, especially during move-in and maintenance calls. However, residents report severe pest problems, unresolved AC and water damage, ignored maintenance requests, and poor trash pickup, with some families leaving after short stays due to heat and bug infestations. The welcome experience masks a pattern once you move in: work orders sit, pest control visits don't happen despite scheduled spraying, and management responses range from dismissive to accusatory. For families needing reliable upkeep and pest control, the gaps between promised service and delivery are significant.

Student HousingSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Buttercup Place Apartments
#151
48 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.3(19)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place offers an affordable place to live near highway and retail access, and reviewers in stable housing report satisfaction with their units. However, recent complaints point to unresponsive management, pest problems, and safety concerns in common areas that raise doubt about maintenance and oversight.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Madeleine
#152
51

The Madeleine

3.0(99)✓ Google-verified

The Madeleine's low average rating masks a sharp divide: a minority report genuine satisfaction with staff helpfulness, while most residents cite persistent pest issues, delayed repairs, water failures, and management unresponsiveness. Maintenance technicians Dwayne and James earned praise for follow-through, yet others wait weeks for basic service requests to start. Residents report roach infestations, ants, water shutdowns blamed on the city (contradicted by neighbors' working service), and mounting unexplained fees. Trash accumulation, dog waste in common areas, and unchecked neighbor complaints add to the decline reviewers describe. The leasing office, when staffed, includes standouts like Cynthia and Tashyra, but office manager Crystal is frequently absent and staff are accused of dismissive attitudes. Conditions appear uneven across the property, with some residents experiencing minor issues while others report health hazards including possible mold in HVAC systems and respiratory problems in young children. One tenant filed a maintenance photo log spanning months with no resolution. Parking is severely limited, enforced neighbor conduct is minimal, and gate security is non-functional. The core tension: reviewers cannot determine whether poor maintenance is widespread neglect or whether discrimination shapes service quality by section or resident type.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)
#153
48

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

2.6(73)✓ Google-verified

Highland Vista residents report a pattern of critical unresolved maintenance failures, persistent pest infestations, and indifferent management that has driven multiple tenants to pursue legal action. Sewage backups, water damage, non-functional heating and cooling, and roach problems persist for weeks or months despite repeated requests. Staff turnover, billing errors, emergency response delays, and hostile interactions with management create an environment where tenants say basic habitability standards go unmet, and disputes often require court intervention to resolve.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Gardens At Cobb Park
#154
56 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Times Square On the Hill
#155
51

Times Square On the Hill

2.9(45)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff-especially Jordan and Benitta-earn consistent praise for kindness and clear communication during move-in. Long-term residents report feeling safe and well-managed. However, newer complaints flag vehicle theft, parking headaches, and delayed fixes on water and maintenance issues, suggesting inconsistent upkeep.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Calloway Place Apartments
#156
55

Calloway Place Apartments

3.6(28)✓ Google-verified

Calloway Place draws strong loyalty from residents who praise quick maintenance response and staff like Penny and Amanda. However, a significant minority report unresolved structural issues (cracked roofs left with temporary fixes, faulty AC units), hidden billing charges, and harsh towing enforcement that catches residents off guard.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Fort West Apartments
#157
46

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments struggles with fundamental maintenance and management failures that create unsafe living conditions. Tenants report raw sewage backups lasting months, unchecked roach infestations, mold, and flooded units with no follow-up. The property management is consistently unreachable; complaints go unanswered and maintenance requests stall indefinitely. A controversial towing policy charges $350 per vehicle despite unclear registration procedures, and the office is often vacant. A handful of long-term residents praise quiet periods and responsive staff, but they appear to be exceptions in a complex marked by code violations, inadequate staffing, and systemic neglect.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Moderne
#158
53

The Moderne

3.3(25)✓ Google-verified

The Moderne splits sharply between recent positive reviews citing responsive staff and a well-managed turnaround, and older negative accounts of filthy move-ins, ignored maintenance requests, and Airbnb chaos. New management appears to have improved responsiveness, but cleanliness and security issues persist in some reports. Location near West 7th and Montgomery Plaza appeals, though pricing and policy transparency draw criticism.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Residences of Diamond Hill
#159
52

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(144)✓ Google-verified

The complex is beset by slow maintenance response and tenant behavior problems. Work orders sit open for months, AC systems fail in heat, and water damage causing mold remains unfixed even when officially marked "resolved". Noise from children and poor neighbor management drive many to leave. A few staff members like Christy Mullins and Jackie/Scarlett stand out, but overall communication from the office is poor, calls go unreturned, and residents feel the property prioritizes rent over their wellbeing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Travis Gardens Apartments
#160
48 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments
#161
47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Autumn Chase Apartments
#162
35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.1(57)

Autumn Chase splits sharply between five-star praise for office staff kindness and swift repairs, and one/two-star complaints about persistent sewage leaks, roaches, slow maintenance despite promises, visitor parking fees, and a high-crime neighborhood with constant police calls. The property has cycled through multiple management teams in short periods, leaving tenants uncertain which experience they will get.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Featured partners for apartment availability

How many apartments do you want to compare?

By sending this enquiry, you agree it will be shared with the leasing office, apartment community, or property manager contacts relevant to your request.

Enquiries submitted through this site's forms may be shared with partner providers who can do the work, and we may receive a referral fee. Our rankings and scores are based on our published method only and are not affected by referral fees.

Common questions about affordable & low-income housing

How much does affordable housing cost in Fort Worth?
It depends on the program. Voucher-based units usually set your portion of rent at roughly 30% of your adjusted income, with the housing authority paying the rest. Tax-credit properties charge a fixed rent based on 30%, 50%, or 60% of the area median income for your household size, regardless of your actual earnings, so two households with different incomes can pay the same rent in the same building.
How often do I need to requalify for affordable housing?
Most programs require annual recertification. You'll submit updated pay stubs, tax returns, or benefit statements each year, and your rent can adjust if your income changes significantly. Missing a recertification deadline can put your lease at risk, so mark the date as soon as you sign.
What should I expect during the application process?
Expect to provide photo ID, Social Security numbers for all household members, proof of income (pay stubs, award letters, or tax returns), and sometimes references from previous landlords. Approval can take anywhere from a few days at a private property with an open unit to several weeks or months if you're being pulled off a waitlist.
How can I tell if an affordable housing property is well managed?
Look at how quickly maintenance requests get handled, whether the property stays occupied without a revolving door of vacancies, and how staff communicate about recertification and lease renewals. Our rankings weigh maintenance responsiveness and reviewer consistency specifically because those two factors separate well-run affordable communities from ones that let upkeep slide.

Last updated 2026-07-24