Fort Worth Apartment Review Guide
Menu

Pet-Friendly Apartments in Fort Worth, TX

Pet-Friendly Apartments in Greater Fort Worth

Finding an apartment in Fort Worth that actually welcomes your dog or cat takes more than checking a "pets allowed" box on a listing site. We've tracked 172 pet-friendly complexes across the city, from Near Southside and West 7th to Alliance and Chisholm Trail, and the difference between a place that tolerates pets and one that's genuinely set up for them is significant. That difference shows up in the fine print: breed and weight restrictions, pet limits per unit, deposit versus non-refundable fee, and whether "pet-friendly" means a small patch of grass by the dumpster or an actual fenced dog park with waste stations.

What to check before you sign

Read the pet policy line by line, not just the marketing page. Ask about breed restrictions (many Fort Worth complexes still exclude certain large or "aggressive" breeds under insurance requirements), maximum weight, and how many pets per unit are allowed. Get the total cost in writing: monthly pet rent, one-time fee, and refundable deposit are three different charges and not every property charges all three. Walk the property and look at the actual pet areas, not just the leasing office. Ask current residents in reviews about noise complaints, cleanup enforcement, and whether the dog park is usable in summer heat or turns to mud after rain.

How we rank these communities

Our scoring weighs pet policy transparency, amenity quality (dog parks, wash stations, walking access), fee structure, and resident feedback specific to living there with a pet. See the full ranked guide to Fort Worth apartment complexes for our top picks, and check our methodology for exactly how we score and weight each factor.

Find an apartment in pet-friendly apartments in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info

All pet-friendly apartments in Fort Worth, TX, ranked by score and relevance

172 businesses, scored on recent reviews. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is pet-friendly apartments, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.

Olympus 7th Street Station
#1
84

Olympus 7th Street Station

4.7(183)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the maintenance team for same-day or next-day service, with Joe Brantley and Larry repeatedly named for their speed and professionalism. Staff like Vivian and Autumn earn high marks for making leasing and move-in smooth and personal. The location draws most renters: walkable to 7th Street, Montgomery Plaza, restaurants, and the Trinity Trail, yet surprisingly quiet for an urban core address. Two serious disputes stand out. One tenant was charged $6,000 for two months after moving out on a month-to-month lease, then an additional $1,500 when disputing the damages, and the account went to collections. Another reported two car break-ins with management refusing to cooperate with police or return calls. These conflicts suggest billing practices and security warrant close scrutiny.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marquis at Stonegate
#2
83

Marquis at Stonegate

4.6(197)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently report a safe, quiet community where maintenance responds within hours to overnight requests and staff build real relationships with tenants. The Trinity Trail access, proximity to shopping and dining, and well-kept pool and fitness center draw families and young professionals who renew leases; parking waitlists and lack of a playground are the main drawbacks. Dale, Kaylee, and Kate are named for their professionalism during move-ins and lease questions. Residents mention staying two years or longer, with multiple people upgrading to bigger units within the same complex rather than moving out.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Monarch Medical District Apartments
#3
83

The Monarch Medical District Apartments

4.6(320)✓ Google-verified

Sean and the leasing team-Jasmine, Sky, and Shawn-consistently earn praise for professionalism, quick turnarounds, and genuine care. Residents highlight Sean's diagnostic skill and willingness to explain repairs; leasing staff welcome new tenants warmly and handle move-ins smoothly. One long-term tenant noted a sharp decline: maintenance responsiveness dropped in the past year, with major issues ignored and communication breaking down. The first two years were strong, but recent deterioration has eroded confidence. This signals a potential shift worth monitoring.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Summers Landing Apartments
#4
82

Summers Landing Apartments

4.3(273)✓ Google-verified

Summers Landing's leasing process stands out for Ivette Fonseca's patience and genuine care, with reviewers repeatedly praising her guidance through tours and apartment selection. The community itself earns consistent marks for clean grounds, functional amenities like the pool and laundry, and staff who make settling in feel effortless and welcoming. Office Manager Veronica and the maintenance team round out a property where move-in goes smoothly and residents report feeling valued from day one. Reviewers moving from out of state or starting fresh highlight the personal attention that shaped their decision to choose this complex.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Parker House
#5
81

Parker House

4.6(262)✓ Google-verified

Most residents experience attentive staff, fast maintenance turnarounds (often same-day), and a community where management treats people by name. The downtown Sundance Square location with modern finishes keeps satisfaction high for many long-term tenants. Two recent departing residents report over $1,000 in contested move-out bills for wear-and-tear items and phantom charges, with difficulty reaching management to dispute. Noise complaints and recent communication gaps during a payment system change suggest infrastructure stress; these issues sit alongside otherwise strong day-to-day care.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing

Find an apartment in pet-friendly apartments in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info
Three77 Park
#6
80

Three77 Park

4.4(208)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently praise the staff, maintenance responsiveness, and upkeep. Named team members like Alexa and Abbe are repeatedly cited for going beyond standard service, while maintenance typically responds within a day to repair requests. Move-in experiences are smooth and welcoming. Three exceptions stand out: two residents experienced quick evictions after late payments, and one visitor witnessed unprofessional conduct (staff filming TikToks during their phone meeting). The first complaint targets payment policy severity; the others reflect isolated incidents. Six-year and five-year residents speak warmly of community events, pest control follow-up, and consistent improvements under multiple management generations.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Fair Park Apartments
#7
79

Fair Park Apartments

4.5(137)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Fair Park for its gated, family-friendly setting, clean grounds, and responsive staff who handle requests promptly. However, some reports document serious maintenance failures, notably months-long delays on AC repairs and pest control issues that management struggled to address.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
35 West at Champions Circle Apartments
#8
79

35 West at Champions Circle Apartments

4.4(340)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the staff for genuine helpfulness and quick maintenance, with apartments described as clean and modern in a good location. Several reported excellent assistance during move-in from named staff like Sara. However, chronic phone accessibility problems, missed tour appointments, and post-move-in office communication breakdowns have frustrated applicants and new residents. One unverified but concerning report claimed theft involving a maintenance worker; the property notes no on-site cameras. Communication quality appears inconsistent, possibly tied to staffing changes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Aviator West 7th
#9
78

Aviator West 7th

4.3(290)✓ Google-verified

Most visitors praise the clean, well-organized property and its proximity to Montgomery Plaza shops. Staff members Leslie, Santos, Christal, and Junior consistently make tours smooth and welcoming, answering questions thoroughly and helping applicants feel confident in their decision. However, some prospective tenants report days of missed calls and no follow-up from the leasing office, with the Molly chatbot creating frustration. One applicant raised serious concerns about application handling and alleged bias. These communication gaps stand out against the generally positive leasing team experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Windsong Apartments
#10
77

Windsong Apartments

4.3(147)✓ Google-verified

Michael and Deanna in the leasing office greet residents by name and handle tours and applications with genuine warmth. Francisco and Logan on maintenance move fast and handle repairs thoroughly. The grounds are peaceful and clean, and long-term residents praise the diverse, respectful community. Two reviewers reported severe cockroach infestations that went unresolved despite multiple calls, turning a small problem into a building-wide issue. Most feedback centers on staff professionalism and responsiveness during move-in and ongoing tenancy. Those who encountered pest problems say management ignored repeated requests for help, which is the core complaint here. The 4.3 rating and 77% five-star distribution reflect strong day-to-day experience for most, but the pest failures leave a sharp edge.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Davis
#11
84

The Davis

4.5(452)✓ Google-verified

Living at The Davis feels like joining a community rather than renting an apartment. Staff members, particularly Marina, consistently make residents feel welcomed and cared for. Maintenance responds quickly to work orders and keeps the property clean. Amenities like the fitness center and pool are well-maintained. Long-term residents cite zero issues over years of tenancy. The quiet, relaxed vibe appeals across age groups and lifestyles. Parking can be tight in some buildings, which matters if you have multiple vehicles. Overall, the combination of responsive staff and genuine community connection sets this complex apart.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Depot
#12
76

The Depot

4.2(245)✓ Google-verified

The Depot delivers consistent comfort in its Sundance Square location, with residents praising immaculate grounds, speedy maintenance responses, and genuinely personable staff. Spacious units and a quiet community feel justify the strong reputation, though parking policies lack clarity and building upkeep occasionally lapses in common areas.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Village on West Seminary
#13
82

The Village on West Seminary

5.0(42)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members like Claudia, Maria, and Taylor create a welcoming experience during tours and the application process, with residents and prospects consistently noting their attentiveness and warmth. The community appeals to families seeking safety and affordability, with new ownership backing recent improvements and a reputation for accessibility that extends from initial inquiry through move-in.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Bexley Clearfork
#14
82

Bexley Clearfork

4.7(372)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Isaiah, Alton, Emily, and Salvador earn consistent praise for warmth and quick responses. Residents note clean grounds, modern apartments, and strong property upkeep. However, pet waste accumulation, overflowing trash bins, open gates allowing tailgating, and delayed maintenance undermine the experience. A major mold and humidity failure went unresolved for months. For the price, many feel the complex lacks basic security and enforcement. Location near shopping, dining, and highways appeals to residents. EV charging stations exist but often sit occupied by non-EV owners due to unenforced parking rules. The gap between staff quality and management systems remains stark.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Cassidy at Western Hills
#15
81

The Cassidy at Western Hills

4.4(799)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, particularly Jannet, consistently go out of their way to make prospects feel heard and welcome. Applicants note the team's genuine care and willingness to work with individual circumstances, which stands out against pressure tactics at other complexes. Once residents move in, maintenance responsiveness can lag, though management has proven willing to act when complaints are escalated. The complex itself is well-maintained, safe at night, and pet-friendly with convenient highway access. Updated finishes and wood-like flooring appeal to many residents. The property feels genuinely community-oriented from the leasing side. However, expect delays if you need maintenance support without pushing for answers.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The George
#16
87

The George

4.9(525)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the maintenance team's quick response and the friendly leasing staff, with many highlighting Jason's exceptional service and the property's clean, safe feel. The location near Clearfork shops and diverse community appeal to multiple age groups, though some report sharp move-out fees, occasional noise from neighbors, and frustration with periodic amenity failures like elevators and pool upkeep. Repeat visitors note the leasing experience is personable and well-organized, and maintenance issues often resolve within hours. Pet owners appreciate the straightforward fee structure. However, pricing concerns and inconsistent staff attention during tenancy suggest the property's service depends heavily on which team members engage with you.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Canopy Homes at Ventana
#17
79

Canopy Homes at Ventana

4.7(67)✓ Google-verified

Staff at Canopy Homes earn consistent praise for responsiveness and warmth throughout leasing and move-in. Homes feature modern designs, private yards, and a curated set of amenities that draw residents seeking townhome-style living with community feel. Pet owners highlight the dog park and grassy spaces; proximity to trails and employers across Fort Worth adds practical appeal. One 7-month-old review reported a persistent sewer odor that had been reported multiple times but went unresolved; most other feedback reflects seamless experiences. Named team members Gracyn, Mallory, and Teagan consistently receive praise for communication and thoroughness. The community sits within the Ventana development, offering gated access, a pool, BBQ areas, putting green, and event lawn. Current residents report easy onboarding and long-term satisfaction with the homes themselves and the lifestyle fit.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Grandmarc at Westberry Place
#18
74 low data

Grandmarc at Westberry Place

4.5(175)✓ Google-verified

Most residents rate Grandmarc highly and highlight attentive leasing staff by name, a welcoming vibe, and quality common areas. Chronic fire alarm issues and occasional maintenance delays temper the experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Cortland Ridglea
#19
80

Cortland Ridglea

4.4(356)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Living here feels like stepping into a well-run operation. The leasing staff (Brooklyn, Kalli, Crystal named specifically) stay proactive and attentive, maintenance teams like Erik respond fast even on holidays, and residents consistently praise the thick walls and landscaping. The grounds are clean and safe, parking is straightforward, and the location near Tom Thumb and Sprouts works well for most. One resident moved from Phase 1 to Phase 2 and found the newer units plagued by roaches and AC issues despite similar pricing, plus pool debris and patio wildlife; management fixed what they could, but the gap between phases surprised them. Overall, the community shines because staff genuinely care and residents feel heard. Quality depends on which phase you choose. Phase 1 residents report fewer maintenance surprises and affordable pricing; Phase 2 units are newer but arrived less inspected for pests and AC. The pet amenities (bark park) and resident events matter to the culture here. Samsung appliances and energy efficiency are standard. Security is tight (police presence after incidents, regular safety emails). For families and post-grads seeking a friendly, responsive place, this works; renters sensitive to pest history or wanting guaranteed build quality should ask detailed move-in inspection questions.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Greens of Fossil Lake Apartments
#20
73

The Greens of Fossil Lake Apartments

4.3(268)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the grounds, landscaping, and maintenance response times, with staff members named repeatedly for their courtesy. However, a significant minority report severe roach problems in multiple buildings despite paying a $5 monthly pest fee, alongside complaints that the gym is too hot, equipment breaks down regularly, and promised upgrades never materialize.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Monticello Oaks Townhomes Apartments
#21
73

Monticello Oaks Townhomes Apartments

4.3(60)✓ Google-verified

Monticello Oaks stands out for attentive maintenance staff (Jeff named repeatedly for quick turnarounds) and a leasing team that walks prospects through options without pressure. Common areas and grounds are consistently spotless. One applicant reported being charged a $50 fee but receiving no response within the promised 24 hours; most recent reviews, however, praise Nelida and the wider team for smooth, professional interactions. The property draws praise for both its physical condition and staff demeanor. Visitors consistently mention arriving at tour appointments to find the place clean and staff ready to help. Maintenance issues get resolved quickly. The single negative review stands as an outlier among 60, suggesting either a processing error or a customer service breakdown on a particular occasion.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Aveline at Centreport
#22
78

Aveline at Centreport

4.3(358)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report a well-maintained property with staff who respond quickly to maintenance requests, though satisfaction hinges on which manager handles their lease. Recent management changes have improved cleanliness and responsiveness, but pet policies are unevenly enforced, and some residents feel unfairly treated over ESA or dog complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Marquis at Bellaire Ranch
#23
82

Marquis at Bellaire Ranch

4.8(96)✓ Google-verified

Marquis at Bellaire Ranch wins consistent praise for its riverfront location, mature trees, and the warmth of its community. Residents highlight fast maintenance response, thoughtful management, proximity to Trinity Trails and Clearfork shops, and a rare blend of younger and older tenants creating a respectful, inclusive atmosphere. One resident reported repeated security failures and property damage disputes totaling $5,000 out of pocket, with minimal follow-up from management. Vehicle break-ins and an open security gate are documented concerns. Most other residents felt safe, though this account merits serious consideration before signing a lease.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Rocklyn at Samuels
#24
78

Rocklyn at Samuels

4.4(225)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise a tight-knit staff and rapid maintenance response, with particular shout-outs to Richard (groundskeeping) and Nicole/Rose/Dominic (leasing). Management feels genuinely invested in resident comfort. Some frustration over pet deposit pricing, parking issues from adjacent winery patrons, and occasional cleanliness oversights, but these do not dampen the overall sense of a well-run property with strong morale. High staff turnover has occurred over the years, though core team members have remained. The property sits in a desirable downtown-adjacent location with appealing amenities. Most residents overlook isolated lapses in favor of the responsive, personable environment.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Mill Stone Apartments Homes
#25
71 low data

Mill Stone Apartments Homes

4.5(58)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents speak highly of their years at Mill Stone, citing affordable rates, a quiet atmosphere, and staff warmth as reasons for staying. Some report pest problems and intermittent pool closures, while parking and gate maintenance have drawn criticism.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Trinity Highline
#26
71

Trinity Highline

4.3(67)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise a strong, named staff: leasing agent Nina, maintenance technician Darmarcus who often completes requests same-day, and grounds keeper Alexis. Move-in was smooth, the finishes are modern, and the location near Sundance Square and the Stockyards makes it feel upscale yet affordable for the area. One significant negative: a former resident's year-long saga involving towed cars, unreimbursed charges, persistent smoke/marijuana odor despite the advertised smoke-free policy, and an unresolved deposit dispute that was never refunded months after departure. Beyond that outlier, the main friction is parking availability (one resident paid $75 monthly extra) and occasional maintenance delays outside of Darmarcus's quick responses. Staff responsiveness and genuine care drive the overwhelmingly positive experience for those who stay.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
4000 Hulen
#27
71

4000 Hulen

4.2(242)✓ Google-verified

Staff, especially managers Robyn and Lily, earn consistent praise for going above and beyond, and maintenance typically responds within days. Spaces are move-in ready and well-maintained. However, location near train tracks brings constant squeaking and brake noise, walls let sound travel between units, and the guest parking policy (three free visits, then $4/day) frustrates residents planning gatherings. Added fees (trash valet, pest control, forced rental insurance at $16/month) compound affordability concerns despite initial pricing appeal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hangar 19
#28
78

Hangar 19

4.5(279)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise Hangar 19's physical upkeep, modern finishes, and standout maintenance team, especially Robert and Kevin. However, two recent prospective tenants reported cold, dismissive experiences with front office staff who seemed reluctant to help and failed to acknowledge scheduled tours. The split highlights a disconnect: long-term residents describe a well-run, caring community where management goes above and beyond; tour-takers encountered what they perceived as indifference and neglect at the point of entry. Staff named positively include Robert (maintenance), Kevin, Marcus, and Monique (leasing).

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Encore Panther Island
#29
76

Encore Panther Island

4.3(122)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Encore Panther Island earns strong loyalty from residents who credit the staff, especially Hailey, Pam, and Angela, with genuine attentiveness and rapid problem-solving. Maintenance typically responds within one to two days; residents consistently praise the clean grounds, working pool, dog park, and walking distance to downtown Fort Worth and Trinity Trails. The experience is tempered by occasional safety concerns in the surrounding area and street noise for ground-level units on the main road. One displaced domestic violence survivor reported a billing dispute after an ex-partner damaged her door during a break-in, alleging management failed to honor verbal commitments despite having been informed of her situation from the start.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Chateau on the River Apartments
#30
77

Chateau on the River Apartments

4.6(301)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents report conflicting experiences. Some praise the Trinity Trail location, staff friendliness, and quick maintenance responses. However, multiple reviews detail years of unresolved water intrusion, mold concerns, pest problems, and repeated AC failures. One tenant required emergency room care due to a broken air conditioner left unfixed for a month. Management transitions (four in five years) appear to correlate with service decline. Newer residents often rate highly based on move-in experience, while longer-term tenants document persistent building issues, inadequate repairs, and delayed accountability. Recent one-star reviews name specific staff (Carissa, Rachel) as dismissive toward disability accommodation requests and unresponsive to urgent health and safety concerns. Positive reviews consistently highlight named leasing agents (Carissa Scott, Courtney Wells, Rachel Tribble) for move-in assistance, but these same names appear in complaints about office responsiveness to maintenance emergencies and accessibility needs.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Elm at River Park
#31
75

The Elm at River Park

4.3(123)✓ Google-verified

Most residents rave about The Elm's thoughtful staff, spotless grounds, and standout dog park, along with prompt maintenance and vibrant events. A few cite frustrations with management responsiveness, package handling, and ancillary services, though these appear occasional amid largely positive long-term stays.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Landing at Centreport Apartments
#32
70

The Landing at Centreport Apartments

3.9(287)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Ole, the maintenance technician, earns consistent five-star praise for speed, professionalism, and a helpful attitude. The small management team keeps the pace of work orders quick, and residents report a peaceful setting. However, parking remains tight with no shade coverage, and some long-term residents worry that amenity upgrades lag behind comparable complexes in the area. Unit features like large closets and spacious rooms appeal to residents, but management's recent upkeep efforts have drawn mixed reviews. Common complaints cite insufficient hallway cleaning and paint residue from remodeling work.

Furnished & Corporate HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
The Phoenix
#33
76

The Phoenix

4.5(71)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the staff's genuine attentiveness and the property's clean, well-maintained condition. Maintenance requests resolve within 24 hours, and named team members like Trey, Erin, Allison, and Kimberly earn repeated recognition for going beyond standard service. Amenities and downtown location appeal to both remote workers and commuters, though guest parking policies and nearby homelessness deserve consideration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Crystal Springs
#34
81

Crystal Springs

4.8(115)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the staff's warmth and professionalism, beautiful finishes, and lively community atmosphere. Many highlight quiet units and responsive maintenance. However, a meaningful minority report paper-thin soundproofing, inconsistent rules enforcement, and parking frustrations-complaints that stand in sharp tension with the majority's experience of peaceful, sound-resistant homes. Staff members including Stevie, Hannah, Kayci, Emily, and Jeff earn frequent mention for patient, attentive service during tours and move-ins. The property's resort-style amenities and River District location draw consistent praise. Negative reviews surface building-specific complaints: loose marijuana and noise enforcement in certain zones, trash room upkeep, and unpredictable move-out fee disputes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Lake Pointe Fort Worth
#35
74

Lake Pointe Fort Worth

4.0(252)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report genuine community feeling with active social events coordinated by staff, and leasing agents like Sandra and Crystal earn consistent praise for responsiveness and going beyond basics to help. A persistent minority encounter serious problems-water intrusion, odors, and pest activity-that management patches but does not resolve at the source, leaving these residents frustrated despite the broader complex appeal. Long-term residents renew leases repeatedly and mention quiet neighborhoods near walking trails and the lake. The complex works with applicants on move-in qualifications. Maintenance follows through on requests in reasonable timelines for most, though those facing structural issues find the response inadequate.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
Monarch Pass Apartments
#36
70

Monarch Pass Apartments

4.1(1071)✓ Google-verified

Monarch Pass draws strong praise for staff warmth, particularly leasing agent Stephanie, and residents report feeling safe in a quiet setting. However, a significant minority struggle with delayed repairs, pest control failures, and laundry equipment that does not work reliably; some cite unresolved maintenance requests weeks after submission and disputes over promised rent relief.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Laurel Heights at Cityview
#37
69

Laurel Heights at Cityview

3.8(361)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the responsive maintenance team and genuinely welcoming staff, citing fast problem-solving and personal attention. Leasing staff like Brittany and Courtney stand out for patience and clarity. Recent fixes to gates and water issues have resolved earlier frustrations. However, parking tow incidents and confusing move-in fees have left some frustrated, and newer office staff sometimes give conflicting information.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Parkside So7 Urban Apartments
#38
74

Parkside So7 Urban Apartments

4.4(267)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the maintenance crew and location near Trinity Park, dining, and trails, with many calling it the best apartment experience they've had. Recent management changes have shaken confidence: some report grounds neglect, security lapses, false fire alarms multiple times weekly, and unresponsiveness to concerns, though others describe current staff as responsive and thoughtful. The core tension is between well-executed operations (when management is engaged) and periods where the property feels neglected despite premium pricing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Berkeley Apartments
#39
75

The Berkeley Apartments

4.2(481)✓ Google-verified

Strong staff and quick maintenance draw residents to renew leases, especially those drawn to community events. However, some face gaps in move-in guidance, pest delays, and surprise maintenance charges that undermine the otherwise positive experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Place At Westover Hills
#40
76

The Place At Westover Hills

3.9(165)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and visitors consistently report feeling safe and supported here. Staff handle maintenance requests within 24 hours, organize monthly community gatherings, and take genuine interest in resident wellbeing. The complex maintains quiet grounds, secures packages, and provides in-unit washers and dryers across all floor plans.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Deco
#41
80

Deco

4.8(114)✓ Google-verified

Residents and touring guests consistently praise Deco's downtown location, professional leasing team (especially Jeremy and Stephanie), and maintenance crew (Cory noted often). The concierge and management staff earn repeated recognition for going beyond what's asked. However, a 10-month resident reports management removed guest parking without notice, directing visitors to an unsafe, potholed lot with paid parking. Mechanical issues plague the building: elevators, doors, garage doors, hot tub, and pool have all failed. The promised first-floor restaurant remains unfinished after two and a half years. Management reportedly refuses to engage on these problems, citing "operational challenges." Rent exceeds $3,000 for a one-bedroom, raising expectations that have not been met.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Bowery at Southside
#42
69

The Bowery at Southside

4.2(142)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing staff earn consistent praise for personal attention and professionalism, particularly Marcella, Jackie, Raven, and Christina. Move-in transparency and online processes appeal to those with simple needs. However, management falls short once residents are in place: noise complaints go unresolved, maintenance staff misconduct was not addressed adequately, and unit cleanliness at move-in often fails to meet promises. Policy design leaves existing residents vulnerable to being passed over for unit transfers, and billing errors compound frustration. A handful report smooth year-long stays, but accountability gaps leave many feeling abandoned after signing the lease. The property markets itself across multiple categories but struggles with core tenant protection. Leasing works well; living here depends heavily on luck with neighbors, staff conduct, and how quickly management acts on complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Hub at Chisholm Trail
#43
69

The Hub at Chisholm Trail

3.5(345)✓ Google-verified

James Parker dominates recent five-star reviews, with renters consistently praising his attentiveness during tours, applications, and move-ins. His communication style puts nervous applicants at ease and speeds up paperwork. The community itself earns steady compliments for cleanliness, quiet grounds, and well-maintained units. Staff across the office appear accessible and patient, creating a leasing experience that feels personal rather than transactional.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Cottages at Deer Creek
#44
73

Cottages at Deer Creek

4.5(108)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth and maintenance speed stand out. Ashlei, Abby, and Kamryn earn repeated praise for patience and quick problem-solving; maintenance tickets move fast. The property feels quiet and fresh, with functional amenities. However, parking is persistently inadequate, some residents report disruptive upstairs noise, rent climbs without clear explanation, and at least one guest experienced dismissive service during maintenance disputes. The community appeals to those prioritizing responsive management and a calm setting. Pet owners find it welcoming. Renters sensitive to noise, parking stress, or unpredictable costs should ask detailed questions before signing. Two-star reviews also flag small washer/dryer units and Google Maps address listing issues affecting package delivery.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
Mercantile River District
#45
79

Mercantile River District

4.5(265)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, especially Noelle and Melissa, earn consistent five-star praise for professionalism and above-and-beyond service during tours and move-ins. Residents highlight resort-style amenities (lazy river, state-of-the-art fitness center, game room) and speedy maintenance response times. The River District location appeals to young professionals and families seeking modern finishes. However, pest control failures, unpredictable fees, and management communication gaps undercut the luxury positioning. A two-month resident reported recurring roaches, unresolved roof noise, and non-responsive staff; a three-year resident cited neglected grounds and astronomical add-ons. Dog park sanitation and parking security are secondary concerns. The experience depends heavily on leasing staff and which building you occupy.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Villas On the Hill
#46
68 low data

Villas On the Hill

4.2(98)✓ Google-verified

Early staff like Margarita and Vanessa earned strong praise for warmth and problem-solving. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management accused of poor response times, evasiveness on pricing, and mishandling of residents with disabilities and military backgrounds. The property itself remains described as clean and well-located near transit and shopping, but service reliability appears to have deteriorated.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Scenic at River East
#47
73

Scenic at River East

4.3(214)✓ Google-verified

Leasing tours and daily operations thrive when handled by staff like Madison, Paula, or Sam, who take time with questions and solve problems fast. Security, communication from back-office management, and move-out billing are serious friction points. Three residents reported multiple break-ins and a permanently open gate; two dispute unreasonable cleaning fees and debt collection threats over contested charges. Location and amenities (Trinity River access, dog parks, rooftop lounge) earn strong praise. Maintenance responds quickly, even on weekends. Pet policies are genuinely accommodating. But prospective residents should ask directly about security protocols, move-out billing policies, and get lease terms in writing. The complex works well for dog owners and downtown proximity seekers willing to verify safety measures upfront.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Solay Fort Worth
#48
73

Solay Fort Worth

4.4(173)✓ Google-verified

Staff members Desteny, Nora, and Monica stand out for patient, helpful service during tours and transfers. Before May, residents report quiet surroundings and fast maintenance. A shift in management has triggered a stark reversal: trash accumulates indoors and outdoors, the gym and pool lack basic cleaning, the gate fails, and residents report car thefts and safety hazards. Complaints note office unavailability and unanswered emails. The 4.4-star rating masks a deep divide. Early reviews praise location, friendliness, and amenities at reasonable cost. Recent reviews describe a property that feels neglected despite luxury pricing, with garbage odors, overflowing chutes, broken systems, and an unsafe perimeter. Residents explicitly tie the decline to management change.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Marq on West 7th
#49
86

The Marq on West 7th

4.8(164)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently praise The Marq for staff responsiveness and a tight-knit community feel. Maintenance requests close within 24 hours, with named staff like Kyle and Johnny earning frequent mention for quick, quality work. The Cultural District location near restaurants, museums, and shops appeals across age groups. One resident cited 13 years of loyalty. A security concern about bike theft and absent cameras surfaces in a small minority of reviews, though most residents report no issues.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Skyview West
#50
73

Skyview West

4.3(221)✓ Google-verified

Skyview West wins strong loyalty from residents who stay multiple years, drawn by spacious layouts, friendly staff named Will and Cari, and maintenance that usually shows up same-day. The dark side emerges in broken AC units left unrepaired for months, fruit flies and roaches found in new units, and management that marks work orders complete when no one showed up. Long-term residents praise the community; recent move-ins hit serious climate and pest problems with little accountability. Staff responses vary widely: some residents report immediate fixes and genuine care, others document zero-visit work orders and dismissive office conversations. A truck theft, pest allergies affecting a child, and repeated false promises about "end of day" repairs appear in multiple complaints. The complex's affordability and space appeal fade fast when AC fails in Texas heat and pest control doesn't materialize.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Cityscape Apartment Fort Worth
#51
73

Cityscape Apartment Fort Worth

4.6(38)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the location, modern design, and staff warmth at this downtown Fort Worth complex. Named leasing and office staff handle move-ins smoothly and remain responsive. The core frustration centers on maintenance credibility: two separate reviewers report a dishwasher broken for 8-10+ months with no fix, a fired maintenance employee, and promises (patio gates, parking) not delivered.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Villas by the Park Apartments
#52
67

Villas by the Park Apartments

4.1(199)✓ Google-verified

Staff earn consistent praise for warmth and responsiveness, with property manager Sara and leasing associate Kate named repeatedly as standout contributors. Maintenance work typically completes within one to two days for routine requests. Safety and upkeep stand as the core tension. Reviewers report vehicle break-ins and theft, a broken front gate left unfixed for years, roaches, and common areas (grounds, dumpster, playground) falling into disrepair. Emergency repairs stall for weeks or months. Some tenants wait months for leak fixes; others face move-in units with broken air conditioning and missing bathroom fixtures. Advertised amenities like the pool and clubhouse rarely or never open.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Monticello Apartments
#53
73

Monticello Apartments

4.1(138)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Linda and the office team earn consistent praise for welcoming newcomers and answering questions without rushing. Mario, the maintenance person, gets named multiple times for handling repair calls promptly at any hour. The complex draws long-term residents who cite quiet surroundings, safe streets, and reasonable rents. One serious complaint describes a keyed car and management's refusal to hold the resident accountable due to no camera proof, which raises a concern about how the community handles disputes between residents. The spacious one and two-bedroom layouts and patios appeal to families staying years. Pet fees run $20 monthly. Staff remain the strongest draw: reviewers repeatedly mention feeling welcomed from the leasing office tour onward. Service calls get addressed without delay.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Braden on Fifth
#54
77

The Braden on Fifth

4.4(179)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers consistently praise the leasing team for personal attention and the location near downtown Fort Worth. The building itself is clean, offers solid amenities like a gym and pool, and residents report friendly neighbors. However, a 2024 management change to Greystar has introduced real friction: visitor parking is severely limited, wifi drops frequently in common spaces, and office hours have become hard to reach during normal work days. Long-term residents appreciated consistency before the transition. The property draws young professionals and remote workers, who especially value the large communal office space with quiet pods. Maintenance tends to be responsive, though some issues (like broken TV screens and slow elevators) linger. Parking, however, remains the most repeated frustration-with only about 20 visitor spots for the entire complex.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Village Creek
#55
66

Village Creek

3.9(263)✓ Google-verified

Move-in gets high marks when the right staff handle it, particularly a manager (Candy, mentioned repeatedly when positive) who goes out of her way and processes paperwork quickly. Once residents are in, maintenance becomes hit-or-miss: some emergency calls go unanswered for hours, AC problems linger unfixed for weeks, and responses depend heavily on which technician shows up. A staff turnover or transition appears to have caused real service gaps recently.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Jennings Place
#56
71

Jennings Place

4.4(105)✓ Google-verified

Jennings Place earns strong ratings from long-term residents and newcomers who praise the downtown location, dog park, and friendly staff members like Adrian, Perla, and Susan. Clean grounds and responsive maintenance earn mention, though recent complaints flag persistent problems: fallen branches, uncollected trash and furniture, mold in units, and delayed service work despite rising rent. Management quality varies noticeably across staff. While Adrian and Luis have won five-star praise for solving tenant issues promptly, one escalated complaint cited a manager's refusal to share corporate contact details and unwillingness to walk the grounds. Reviewers also note inconsistent maintenance staffing and that lawn care sometimes goes incomplete.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Loft Vue Living
#57
66

Loft Vue Living

3.9(208)✓ Google-verified

Loft Vue wins renter loyalty through two standouts: leasing staff (particularly Roderick and Alexa) who spend hours on first-time-renter questions and close deals same-day, and furnished units near TCU that undercut local student housing prices. The dark side is sporadic but serious: months-long Wi-Fi outages and ceiling damage without response, units entered without notice, belongings removed, cleaning fees charged on top. Two of 17 recent reviews report management that felt extractive rather than helpful. The business attracts strong initial sentiment from the leasing team and location, but a vocal minority report maintenance neglect and billing practices that undercut trust. For price-conscious TCU students with low maintenance expectations, the convenience and furnished options appeal. For anyone who might need quick repairs or careful lease-term billing, the gaps in follow-through management are a real risk.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Taj Mahal Apartments
#58
66

Taj Mahal Apartments

3.6(101)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents have stayed for years because of genuine care from management, particularly Jackie Sevilla, and reliable maintenance crew David and Emad. The draw is bills-paid affordability near downtown, a quiet atmosphere, and staff that handle requests same-day without bureaucracy. Long-standing tenants prize the second-chance rental policy and resort pool. One resident flagged inconsistent neighbor behavior and wished for gated entry or garage parking, but these are exceptions in an overwhelmingly loyal base.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Presidium Revelstoke
#59
71

Presidium Revelstoke

4.3(313)✓ Google-verified

Presidium Revelstoke draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise Stephanie, Carlee, and the maintenance team for responsiveness and care. But a sharp divide emerged recently: a new property manager's combative style, unresolved security concerns (vehicle break-ins, broken gates, missing cameras), package theft, and noise complaints from poor building construction have left newer and frustrated residents questioning whether the premium price justifies the service. The complex excels at cosmetic upkeep and amenities (power washing, dog park, pet washing station) and staff like Stephanie earn genuine affection. However, systemic gaps remain: a faulty AI chatbot, difficulty reaching the office, gate remotes delayed weeks, pet owners ignoring community rules, and move-in units handed over uncleaned. Management changes appear ongoing; the shift in tone since a previous manager departed has triggered lease-renewal anxiety among residents who feel unheard.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Broadstone on Trinity
#60
72

Broadstone on Trinity

4.0(315)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report strong satisfaction with the location, staff professionalism, and a maintenance team that responds quickly and goes extra lengths during repairs. Leasing staff like Karli and management earn consistent praise for friendliness and problem-solving. Mold discoveries, questionable move-out carpet charges without documented proof, and recurring fee surprises trouble a vocal minority. Window leaks and elevator breakdowns have also been noted. Pet owners especially report alarm over undocumented damage claims on move-out.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Lodge at River Park
#61
70

The Lodge at River Park

3.9(180)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the helpful staff, riverside location, and value proposition, with many returning or extending leases. Ashley Pitts and the management team receive consistent recognition for going beyond standard service. However, long-term tenants report hidden fees eating into that value, thin walls letting neighbors' noise through, and maintenance that prioritizes appearances over lasting repairs; rent hikes are predictable and firm.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Overture River District
#62
82

Overture River District

4.8(59)✓ Google-verified

Residents and visitors consistently praise the staff, particularly sales associates Darla Young and Sierra Alexander for patient, pressure-free guidance through the leasing process. Maintenance responds quickly to requests, office staff remain helpful and smiling, and the community hosts regular social events like Wednesday gatherings. The property appeals strongly to retirees making the shift from home ownership to apartment living.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Terraces of Marine Creek Apartments
#63
71

Terraces of Marine Creek Apartments

3.9(150)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents consistently praise maintenance staff, particularly JJ, for solving problems quickly and with genuine care. Leasing team, especially Huseni, earns repeated mention for warmth and professionalism. The property feels quiet and clean, with newer updates like the reopened pool adding value. However, a small but serious segment reports persistent roach problems across multiple units since late 2023, plus confusion over smoking policy. While new management has improved conditions, older residents note the community has not fully recovered from past neglect. These issues affect peace of mind despite otherwise strong satisfaction.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Montage Southside
#64
81

Montage Southside

4.6(93)✓ Google-verified

Tracy and Valerie in leasing earn repeated praise for patience, knowledge, and follow-through; residents consistently report clean, spacious homes and a well-kept community in a walkable downtown location. Maintenance responds quickly to requests, and the staff accommodates move-in timing flexibly. One sharp complaint marks the departure of a previous manager residents valued highly. The property appeals to people relocating, pet owners (nearby bars and restaurants, walkable area), and renters who toured multiple communities before choosing here. Competitive pricing relative to amenities is noted. Staff turnover has created a small sting in an otherwise stable experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Mariposa Park Apartments
#65
64

Mariposa Park Apartments

3.5(102)✓ Google-verified

New management under Edith and Melina has energized the community in recent months, with residents consistently noting faster issue resolution and a visible shift toward better upkeep. Staff attentiveness stands out, especially Melina's hands-on presence and Edith's professionalism, though some residents flag declining maintenance consistency and persistent security gaps like dark parking areas. The apartment complex appears to approve residents who struggle elsewhere and maintains a family-friendly atmosphere. Rafael and other maintenance staff get named for specific fixes, but one long-term resident noticed recent decline in the primary technician's work quality, and lighting infrastructure issues remain unaddressed despite repeated mentions.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Villas of Eastwood Terrace
#66
74

Villas of Eastwood Terrace

4.3(159)✓ Google-verified

Most visitors praise the welcoming staff, particularly naming Brenda Reese and Keven for their attentiveness to prospective tenants and families seeking senior housing. Apartments are described as clean and well-maintained, with management noted as responsive to residents. One tenant raised concerns about selective rule enforcement and alleged disrespect from front-office staff toward older residents, plus roaming pets on the grounds.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Renaissance Gardens
#67
64

Renaissance Gardens

3.7(192)✓ Google-verified

Strong office staff and recent management improvements keep long-term residents happy, but new tenants frequently encounter unit condition gaps and pest control struggles. Nelly and Lilia earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine effort. The property has modernized under new leadership, yet maintenance delays on critical issues (infestation, broken AC, plumbing) frustrate tenants seeking better living conditions. Quality varies sharply between what prospective renters see during tours and what they receive at move-in. Roach and gnat problems persist despite requests for treatment. A three-year resident notes work orders are now fixed promptly, but newer tenants report weak pest control responses and weeks-long waits for repairs.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Firestone at West 7th
#68
70

Firestone at West 7th

4.1(539)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team delivers standout service during move-in, and individual maintenance workers respond fast to requests. Downtown location and walkability draw praise, but the property shows its age: windows leak, AC fails repeatedly, and the emergency response disappoints in summer heat. Residents report inconsistent policy enforcement and a shift toward rowdier tenant mixes that management hasn't addressed. Genuine resident feedback diverges sharply from some clustered reviews mentioning specific staff; one tenant suspects fake positive posts from non-residents. The core trade-off is smooth leasing experience against ongoing building maintenance and neighbor quality struggles that seasoned residents find intolerable despite the location appeal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Union at River East
#69
63

The Union at River East

3.7(235)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise Orlando's warmth during leasing and the maintenance team's speed when engaged, plus the pool and outdoor amenities. However, persistent problems shadow the experience: a garage gate down for months, staff hostility when residents report issues, slow administrative solutions, and billing confusion that creates unexpected charges. Some see recent improvement; others view these as core management failures.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Broadway Chapter
#70
80

Broadway Chapter

4.7(89)✓ Google-verified

Residents and prospective tenants consistently praise the staff, especially managers Halie, Izabella, Katie, and Megan, for patience and going beyond their role to help with applications and move-in. Units are modern and well-maintained, and the Bricktown location near restaurants and bars appeals to those wanting walkability. Two one-star reviews flag rude leasing interactions and unclear self-tour instructions, though these are outliers in an 89-review sample skewed heavily toward five-star ratings.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Overlook Ranch
#71
73

Overlook Ranch

4.3(233)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

New management last year has restored maintenance response and staff courtesy, with several residents praising quick fixes and welcoming leasing staff. Persistent problems shadow the experience: vehicle break-ins and lack of security cameras, billing disputes and unexplained charges, aggressive rent hikes, and a troubled gate system create friction that offsets the well-designed clubhouse.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Bell Presidio
#72
66

Bell Presidio

4.0(292)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Bell Presidio attracts strong praise for individual staff like Anna and Cyrian and amenities like the gym and pool, but residents consistently report a divided experience. The property looks well-designed on arrival, yet ongoing complaints center on roach infestations, delayed maintenance responses, management turnover, and a disconnect between advertised luxury pricing and upkeep. Communication from the leasing office is a widespread frustration: emails go unanswered, promised concessions are delayed, and residents report needing to visit in person to resolve issues. Multiple residents pay over $2,000 monthly and describe pest problems lasting months, trash buildup in parking areas, repeated pool closures, and broken gym equipment. Recent lease processing and ESA accommodation requests have created additional stress. The property changed ownership recently, which reviewers link to declining conditions and staff instability. Maintenance and select staff earn consistent praise for effort within constraints, but management accountability and responsiveness remain the core complaint.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Crescent Residences
#73
78

The Crescent Residences

4.5(102)✓ Google-verified

Residents and touring prospects consistently highlight the staff's responsiveness and professionalism across leasing, concierge, and maintenance roles, along with intentional community-building through regular events. Specific team members (Natasha, Vlad, Milton, Gary) earn repeated praise for going above their job descriptions to welcome and support residents. Construction noise remains a real drawback depending on unit location, and turnover among previous management teams had frustrated some residents, though new management (RPM) has stabilized operations and committed to addressing concerns. The property itself draws praise for being beautiful and well-maintained.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Kelley at Samuels Avenue
#74
62

The Kelley at Samuels Avenue

3.6(251)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents love the finishes, amenities, and staff like Omar, Vanessa, and Sheree who handle maintenance requests within hours and make move-in smooth. The location near Stockyards and Downtown works, and river views impress. However, recent applicants report a troubling pattern: leasing staff have sold them unavailable units, given false approval signals, held deposits for weeks, and responded to disputes with evasion or police calls instead of solutions. The gap between resident contentment and applicant chaos suggests operational breakdown in leasing and management accountability. Two separate families relocated 350+ miles after being assured approvals were final, given portal access to set up utilities, then faced sudden termination notices with no real explanation. Staff distraction during tours and open-door privacy breaches add to the sense of disorganization. For those already in, it's a solid home. For those trying to get in, the risk is substantial.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marine Creek Apartments
#75
71

Marine Creek Apartments

4.2(504)✓ Google-verified

The complex draws strong praise for front-line staff warmth and maintenance speed, with tenants citing prompt work orders and attentive management, especially managers Cecelia and Jacqueline. However, a persistent minority report serious problems: active pest infestations despite pest control calls, shoddy repairs (wood/paint patches over structural issues), mysterious fee charges that damaged credit when reported to collections, and unresolved safety concerns like broken door locks. The split between glowing long-term residents and deeply frustrated departing tenants suggests inconsistent service across departments and time. Positive experiences cluster around move-in speed, unit finishes (wood floors, granite, stainless steel), and grounds upkeep. Negative experiences concentrate on maintenance quality gaps, pest management failures, billing practices, and a sense that corporate ignores escalated complaints. Multiple reviews name responsive individuals (Cecelia, Alejandra, Ronaciel, Alexis) but also point to a lack of accountability higher up.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Reserve on Willow Lake
#76
78

The Reserve on Willow Lake

4.6(191)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and well-established staff relationships form the core of positive experiences here; Mackenzie Tucker, Will, Abraham, and Vivem earn repeated praise for genuine care, responsiveness, and professionalism. The property itself excels: gated, quiet, spacious units, immaculate grounds, and quick maintenance response. However, recent ownership and management transitions have created serious friction. Multiple residents report move-out fees buried in fine print, payment plans that were ignored and sent to collections anyway, new staff unresponsiveness, and one leasing agent's dismissive, interrogating demeanor during tours. One-star reviews cluster after management change, suggesting systemic breakdown rather than isolated complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hunter Plaza
#77
78

Hunter Plaza

4.3(188)✓ Google-verified

Staff excellence drives positive experiences here, especially leasing agent Nadia who handles applications with transparency and speed, and maintenance crew Erin and Francisco who respond quickly to requests. One resident reported serious safety, cleanliness, and harassment concerns that management appears not to have addressed; another flagged record-keeping issues and lease documentation problems. The building shows investment in updates-new washers, working elevators, clean hallways-though older infrastructure remains. Most tenants describe a warm welcome and smooth move-in, with staff treating them as individuals rather than numbers. Common praise focuses on Nadia's personal attention during the leasing process, maintenance responsiveness, and the property's central downtown location. The facility amenities (fitness center, theatre, library, business center, garage parking) are listed but not detailed in reviews.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Harden at Public Market
#78
77

The Harden at Public Market

5.0(22)✓ Google-verified

Move-in feels personal rather than transactional here. Staff members like Taylor, Ashley, and Michele walk prospects through floor plans with genuine patience, follow up quickly, and remember residents' names. Maintenance staff Chris, Greg, and others arrive promptly for service calls and fix issues properly; reviewers single them out by name across months. The building itself is new, sits in restored historic Public Market with restaurants planned, and offers courts for pickleball and a resort pool. One reviewer compared this unfavorably to other Fort Worth complexes and found the difference striking. Residents report feeling cared for rather than like account numbers. The location near TCU, Downtown, and the Medical District draws people for proximity to work and family. Early-stage teething with a new build hasn't dented sentiment; instead, reviewers credit management for working through kinks. The vibe is notably informal-staff offer coffee and refreshments, greet people by name in the hallway, and a leasing professional who placed a client there called their team's commitment to follow-through rare in the market.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
The Haven at Chisholm Trail
#79
60

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

3.5(458)✓ Google-verified

Tenants split sharply on The Haven at Chisholm Trail. Office staff and maintenance teams earn consistent praise for patience and responsiveness, and early move-in flexibility stands out. However, serious safety concerns dominate lower ratings: residents report management's failure to evict a tenant accused of assault, wrongful eviction filings after payment issues, and a pattern of ignored maintenance requests. Communication gaps and damage dispute charges add to tenant frustration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Jameson at the Bluffs
#80
69

Jameson at the Bluffs

4.2(212)✓ Google-verified

Residents divide sharply on Jameson at the Bluffs. Supporters praise the resort-style pool, thoughtful staff (Emily, Joey, Josie, Tracy, Endy named specifically), and maintenance that typically responds within 48 hours. Detractors report persistent security gaps: broken gates, homeless encampments in the parking lot, tire theft, and property damage (black mold, flooding, collapsed ceilings) left unaddressed or charged back to tenants despite maintenance acknowledging systemic first-floor water issues. The leasing application process has frustrated returnees through third-party AI income verification (Snappt) that flags legitimate documents as fraudulent, denies employer contact, and keeps admin and application fees without refund. Renters also cite aggressive deposit withholding (charges approaching or meeting full deposit), recurring AC and pest problems, and train noise. The gap between five-star reviews from longer-term residents and one-star reviews from those departing suggests the community's appeal fades once security and maintenance shortcomings become apparent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Palm Tree Apartment Homes
#81
60 low data

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

3.8(45)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently note the quiet atmosphere and cleanliness across multiple visits. Modern amenities and wheelchair accessibility draw praise, though one reviewer noted staff are rarely visible on the property.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Ramble & Rose
#82
69

Ramble & Rose

4.2(181)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Brittney and Savanah are consistently praised for their knowledge and care during tours and applications. However, move-in delays, communication breakdowns during the leasing process, and a management shift in December have created serious frustration. Once residents move in, complaints center on slow maintenance responses (sometimes months), unannounced unit entries, and noisy neighbors that management dismisses rather than resolves. Security deposits have been illegally withheld for normal wear and tear. The units themselves remain attractive, but operational and administrative failures are driving long-term residents away. The property struggles with inconsistent execution beyond the leasing office. Hallways, elevators, and common areas report cleaning issues. Utility shutoffs happen with minimal notice. Construction on the south side creates ongoing access problems. Staff are often described as friendly in person but unable or unwilling to follow through on promises. Residents who have stayed longer (2-3 years) cite recent management changes as the source of decline.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Southern Oaks Apartments
#83
65

Southern Oaks Apartments

3.9(128)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise Brenda, Norma, and Glenn Jones by name for personal attention and fast repairs, and many call the community quiet and welcoming. Management earns trust through responsiveness and genuine care. However, serious operational gaps undermine this goodwill: pest control failures were knowingly withheld, fees are disputed and sometimes unrefundable, senior tenants report repeated harassment, and one recent resident faced a pre-existing mice infestation management denied knowing about. The divide between individual staff kindness and institutional dysfunction creates polarized experiences.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Willow Glen
#84
74

Willow Glen

4.1(199)✓ Google-verified

Willow Glen draws consistent praise for its quiet setting, clean grounds, and attentive staff who resolve issues quickly. Residents of multiple years highlight pool gatherings and friendly community events as major draws. Serious concerns emerge around pest control, deposit practices, and transparency. One resident reported a roach-infested unit from move-in day, while another documented their refundable deposit being converted to inflated utility charges and unsubstantiated damage claims.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Palmer
#85
65

The Palmer

4.0(61)✓ Google-verified

The Palmer earns strong praise for friendly, responsive leasing staff and a quiet, pet-welcoming boutique community near trails and shopping. One former resident documented months of unresolved billing errors, wrongful debt collection charges, and repeated management claims to fix the issue without taking action, ultimately harming their credit and business.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Life at Westland Estates
#86
59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(190)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Positive experiences center on Natisha and Amanda, who earn consistent praise for patience, availability, and going beyond the lease process. Maintenance under Fabian responds quickly and handles repairs correctly. The apartments themselves are spacious and amenities work well when accessible. However, persistent complaints about roach infestations, non-functional gates, and limited gym access overshadow these strengths. Safety issues like package theft and unruly tenant behavior concern some residents. The gap between five-star and one-star reviews reflects a stark divide: those who encounter engaged management praise it highly, while others face pest problems and poor front-desk responsiveness.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing

Find an apartment in pet-friendly apartments in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info
District at LeftBank
#87
64

District at LeftBank

3.8(294)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The property shows a sharp divide between longtime dissatisfaction and hope under new ownership. Long-term residents report repeated water damage from faulty sprinkler lines, serious black mold left unaddressed, broken elevators, and broken security gates that made theft common. Pest control requests went unanswered for months despite infestations. Recent reviews praise the new management team (Adrienne, Britain, Sophia, Nicole, Lauryn) for quick responses and genuine care, though structural and systemic issues remain unresolved. The location near West 7th and downtown Fort Worth, spacious floor plans, and pet amenities attract residents, but safety concerns and maintenance neglect have driven many away. Staff responsiveness has improved noticeably, with new management resolving lease transfers and handling calls promptly. However, residents flag ongoing problems: dark hallways with burned-out lights, dog waste throughout common areas, and exterior doors still broken months into the transition. One resident reported being charged thousands in unexpected "reletting fees" after moving out with proper notice.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Huntley
#88
69

The Huntley

4.1(163)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Shoni and Jai earn consistent praise for attentive, personable service. New tenants find the amenities and finishes impressive. But persistent complaints span thin walls, repeated theft despite cameras, dirty common spaces, and management's failure to address safety issues like trespassing and indecent exposure. Long-term residents report significant decline since a recent management changeover.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Aero Apartments
#89
59

Aero Apartments

3.0(217)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise recent management changes and the maintenance app when it works, but recurring complaints about roaches, delayed repairs, and broken utilities like AC during summer heat contradict service promises. The divide is sharp: satisfied tenants credit cleanliness and responsibility, while frustrated ones report management ignores maintenance tickets, changes staff constantly, and prioritizes rent collection over habitability.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Sierra Gardens
#90
59

Sierra Gardens

3.2(203)✓ Google-verified

Sara Paz and her leasing team stand out for speed and patience; many tenants moved in within hours of applying and praise their follow-up. Units inside are fresh and grounds are quiet, but residents report weeks without hot water, unauthorized towing, loud music at night, and slow fixes for maintenance issues like rodents and AC. The complex polarizes: those handled by Sara stay happy; others face poor communication and unresolved problems.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Arbors on Oakmont
#91
74

The Arbors on Oakmont

4.3(301)✓ Google-verified

The Arbors delivers standout hospitality from named staff like Genesis, McKenzi, and Sonia, who consistently earn praise for warmth, attentiveness, and making the lease process smooth. Residents and prospects report beautiful, quiet apartments with thorough cleaning by Ashley and strong maintenance support. However, a significant recent infestation complaint reveals critical gaps: one resident encountered persistent cockroaches from move-in, saw maintenance requests closed without action, and waited 48 hours for management response during a genuine crisis. Earlier reviews also flag occasional rudeness from front office staff and a mismatch between photos and reality. The 79% five-star rate masks sharp polarization.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Ridgmar Plaza Apartments
#92
59

Ridgmar Plaza Apartments

3.7(48)✓ Google-verified

Ridgmar Plaza draws strong praise for Yolanda's hands-on management and her quick response to tenant needs, creating a calm, welcoming community where residents feel safe. Units are spacious with upgrades, many include bills paid, and pricing suits those watching their budget, though some mention occasional pest problems and pockets of neighbor conflict.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
The Club at Stonegate Apartments
#93
67

The Club at Stonegate Apartments

4.0(346)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Rod and a handful of staff members earn consistent praise for fast, attentive maintenance work. The location suits people near TCU, and many residents love the quiet neighborhood feel and pet amenities. However, prospective tenants repeatedly hit a wall: the complex uses AI chatbots that don't transfer calls to humans, making it nearly impossible to reach the leasing office before signing. Once inside, residents report serious structural issues (mold, water damage, broken windows), expensive move-out fees ($1,100+), undisclosed monthly charges, and a management team that dismisses health concerns. The divide is stark: families praising the safe community coexist with tenants fleeing due to hidden contracts and unresolved building defects. The complex's shift to AI support has created its biggest liability. Reviewers note that Preia (a leasing agent) is helpful when you reach her, but she is the exception. Maintenance quality depends heavily on who you get; Rod is exceptional, but others are slow or provide cosmetic fixes to serious problems. Move-in experience varies widely. Lease terms are strict, and the cumulative cost of undefined monthly fees plus break penalties catches many tenants off guard.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Northwood Apartments
#94
67

Northwood Apartments

3.9(53)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Northwood has experienced a sharp turnaround since new management arrived. Jannette and her team consistently handle move-ins and resident issues quickly and personally. Visitors report a quiet neighborhood, clean grounds, and staff who know residents by name and treat them well. Tenants note rent climbs steadily, and a few long-timers remember rough periods under prior leadership. The transformation is recent but deep. Residents who had doubts before now praise the professionalism and genuine care. Families with seniors and single parents say they feel heard. A long-time tenant mentioned staying 15+ years despite reservations about past management. On-site amenities and the calm feel of the complex come up regularly.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Luxia River East Apartments
#95
74

Luxia River East Apartments

4.4(552)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the leasing team (Joshua, Reggie, Victor, Josh) for patient tours and detailed explanations, and the maintenance crew (Oscar, Edgar) for quick, thorough work. Cleanliness and location near downtown draw strong compliments. Yet repeat issues plague tenants: surprise charges for short notice violations, aggressive vehicle towing that catches registered cars, units swapped on move-in day, and staff who sometimes ignore calls or seem indifferent to problems. Management has improved recently under new team members, but systemic billing traps and parking enforcement remain serious pain points. The gap between exceptional individual staff and frustrating backend policies leaves residents conflicted. Those who stay for years feel genuinely cared for; those caught in overage fees or towing cycles feel exploited. The community itself feels safe and well-designed, but the fine print and operational inconsistencies erode trust.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Bryan Flats
#96
63

Bryan Flats

4.1(15)✓ Google-verified

Alicia and her leasing team earn consistent praise for attentiveness and genuine care, making the tours and move-in process smooth. The building itself is clean and quiet, but slow maintenance, thin walls that transmit noise, street parking, and unclear fee structures frustrate residents staying long term.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Bell Lancaster Apartments
#97
63

Bell Lancaster Apartments

3.7(259)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Karen and the maintenance team earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine care, making leasing and repairs straightforward. That goodwill runs into a wall of systemic problems: water damage left unrepaired for years, unsanitary common areas, frequent management changes that leave tenants without clear accountability, and billing errors around move-in promotions. One resident paid $800 extra after being rushed into a lease without receiving promised rent concessions. The property has real strengths in its units and staff presence, but struggles to translate day-to-day friendliness into reliable property management. Issues pile up (dumpster overflow, dog waste on grounds, pool maintenance failures) and linger. Lease disputes after move-out add friction. For those who find the right unit and avoid maintenance crises, Bell Lancaster works. For others, poor follow-through on repairs and management inconsistency creates years of frustration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Cooper Apartments
#98
67

The Cooper Apartments

3.8(353)✓ Google-verified

Staff at The Cooper win strong praise for responsive, patient service during the leasing process, particularly Ana and Michelle. The complex attracts renters drawn to its city views, safe area, and proximity to TCU, and recovered well after a significant fire. However, a single low review cites maintenance failures, high post-fire pricing, and past management problems as reasons to avoid the property at current rates.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Monterra Village
#99
72

Monterra Village

4.3(428)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the maintenance team's speed and the office staff's warmth-Megan, Madison, and others handle moves and requests efficiently, and the community feels welcoming. A vocal minority reports serious problems: repeated AC breakdowns, pest infestations left unaddressed, front office unavailability during crises, and aggressive move-out billing practices tied to corporate ownership changes. Leasing interactions are inconsistent; some feel unwelcome and describe pricing manipulation. Long-term residents split sharply: those planning to stay cite three pools, townhomes, and genuine staff care; those departing cite the property's age and Weidner management's nickel-and-diming approach. One recent tour involved a leasing agent who did not greet visitors, rushed a family with a one-year-old during the golf cart ride, and showed apparent discomfort when pricing was questioned.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Trail Lakes Apartments
#100
72

The Trail Lakes Apartments

4.9(13)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the complex for its clean, quiet grounds and responsive management. The property manager Amanda stands out across reviews for her professionalism, availability, and genuine care for tenants; maintenance staff are described as friendly and helpful.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
SageWater Village
#101
72

SageWater Village

3.9(214)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the maintenance team and management for their attentiveness and warmth. The grounds, pool, and walking trails draw appreciation, and staff like Omar, Alfredo, Darah, Erica, and Jake earn repeated mention. One long-term resident reports 18+ months of unresolved secondhand smoke complaints despite repeated calls, suggesting enforcement gaps that management has not addressed.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Standard River District
#102
66

Standard River District

4.0(146)✓ Google-verified

Residents love the physical space and a few standout staff members, but many face months-long waits for repairs, ignored requests, and poor management responsiveness. Etta, Daniel, Malique, and Kia earn specific praise for patient leasing help; others report maintenance never shows, enters without permission, or fails to fix leaks and AC issues. A clean pool and 15-foot ceilings appeal to move-in day, yet unresolved neighbor noise, pet waste in hallways, and deposit refund delays push long-term residents toward one-star ratings.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Mercantile Square
#103
57

Mercantile Square

2.8(224)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance standout Mr. Carlos earns serious praise, and some residents report a welcoming leasing office and decent prices for income-restricted units. However, the majority describe a troubled experience: slow or absent management response to maintenance and noise complaints, persistent roach infestation despite frequent cleaning, surprise fees and payment issues, broken promises about specials and security, and long-closed amenities residents paid for. Noise from neighbors and poor ground upkeep compound the frustration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Bexley Champions Circle
#104
71

Bexley Champions Circle

4.3(206)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance stars like Lallish earn consistent five-star praise for professionalism and speed, and the grounds are clean with appealing amenities. But residents report paper-thin walls that prevent sleep, slow and incorrect diagnoses on major appliances, and a move-out process marred by inflated charges sent immediately to collections. Management's noise complaint verification system backfired, threatening residents for using it. New management has taken a hard line on lease enforcement, raising concerns about transparency and fairness. The split reflects two different experiences depending on whether you encounter stellar technicians or hit policy friction. Appliance repairs often require multiple visits. Move-out disputes loom large in recent complaints, and residents cite management's reluctance to replace aging equipment.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Flats on Mill
#105
62

Flats on Mill

3.7(230)✓ Google-verified

Strong personalities on staff, especially Jenneth, earn repeated praise for attentive leasing and fast repairs. Yet the property wrestles with a deep split: long-term residents who found the community quiet and well-maintained under current ownership stand against those who left after pest infestations, management turnover, security problems, and constant fee surprises. One reviewer experienced cockroaches, shootings, 12 police cars, and a locked unit at move-out within 11 months; another praised silence and care from the same address. The pool has sat closed for two years, raising questions about promised amenities. Staff inconsistency mirrors these swings. Jenneth, Caesar (maintenance), and the current team earn genuine affection; an office worker named Michelle drew complaints about rudeness. Residents on quieter grounds report thriving; those in active zones report the opposite. New ownership appears to have stabilized things for some, but fee creep and pest control gaps persist even under the new regime.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Highline on Magnolia
#106
65

Highline on Magnolia

4.3(44)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers praise the modern finishes, high ceilings, and proximity to downtown coffee shops and restaurants. Leasing staff Kevin and property manager Eveliz consistently earn individual praise for responsiveness and warmth. However, residents report escalating frustration with management response times, persistent delivery access problems on weekends, and security deposits taking months to process even after regional escalation. The building itself and maintenance work get quick attention, but broader property operations struggle. Residents note the dog park upgrade and new flooring, yet say management communication around these disruptions was minimal. Some newer residents feel the rent is steep relative to unit size and lack of resort amenities.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Shelby at Northside
#107
72

Shelby at Northside

4.3(301)✓ Google-verified

Staff go out of their way to help during leasing and maintenance, and families enjoy the amenities and community feel. Security and cleanliness lag behind the friendly front-office experience. The broken gate alarm, unsecured doors, and litter in common areas frustrate longer-term residents, though recent reviews suggest some improvements to the gate system.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Magnolia Lofts On Vickery
#108
57

Magnolia Lofts On Vickery

4.0(23)✓ Google-verified

Staff professionalism and location shine, but serious construction and maintenance problems plague the complex. Multiple tenants report severe water damage, poor move-in conditions, weak security, and noise issues that management either delayed fixing or refused to address, citing cost. Leasing team earns consistent five-star praise, yet long-term residents face costly repairs, high utilities, and deposit disputes that undermine the luxury positioning.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Henderson
#109
61

The Henderson

3.6(270)✓ Google-verified

Split reviews reflect a property in transition. Five-star ratings highlight staff care (especially Linda's hands-on leasing) and working amenities, while one- and two-star reviews document ongoing infrastructure issues: water damage, mold, pest infestations, and slow repairs. A new management team has made gains recently, but charge disputes, collections hassles, and loose enforcement of community standards linger from prior transitions. Location and amenities draw residents; upkeep and consistency hold them back.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Bottle House on Main
#110
66

Bottle House on Main

3.8(248)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Gigi, Kaleigh, and Daje have earned strong loyalty from residents. Management responds quickly to maintenance issues and makes people feel valued during tours and stays. The complex sits close to downtown with a welcoming coffee area. However, cleanliness varies across common areas. Residents report filthy hallways, elevators, and gym equipment that does not work. Some tenants faced communication breakdowns and lease delays during move-in, leaving a frustrating first impression despite later improvements.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Presidio at River East
#111
71

Presidio at River East

4.3(53)✓ Google-verified

Most residents consistently praise the maintenance staff, especially Juan, for quick response times and genuine care. Front office workers including Joy and Brittany earn repeated credit for going above and beyond during move-in and ongoing support. The community feels clean, well-kept, and has genuine amenities like pool and park access, with stunning downtown views. However, structural issues dog the experience: thin walls mean neighbors' noise carries constantly, gates fail regularly or stay open, and parking is tight with repeated car thefts and break-ins reported. Management has been responsive to some complaints but slow to address pool-access problems from outsiders and dismissive about noise concerns. One denied applicant flagged an inflexible screening system.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Atlas Waterside
#112
70

Atlas Waterside

4.2(174)✓ Google-verified

Life at Atlas Waterside centers on a scenic riverfront location with walkable access to restaurants, shops, and the Trinity trail. Leasing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and grounds are well-kept with modern finishes, pool, and gym amenities. When problems arise, support falters. Multiple residents report unresolved security gaps (insufficient camera coverage, broken fobs, garage vulnerabilities), water damage from burst pipes, slow app-based gate systems, and management that becomes unresponsive after initial turnover. Staff commission disputes also appear unresolved over months, and pricing sits high relative to these service gaps.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
REVL Crockett Row
#113
70

REVL Crockett Row

4.3(139)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Revl Crockett Row attracts praise for its leasing and maintenance teams, who handle urgent requests quickly and treat residents as individuals. Staff members Luis, Gabby, Madison, Junior, and Hernan are named repeatedly for going above and beyond. The complex offers modern units, a distinctive third-floor amenity space, gym and pool, and strong security on West 7th. However, significant operational gaps undermine the experience. Pest issues appear in recent reviews; freezing pipes trigger false fire alarms at least 20 times yearly; unresolved move-out communication led to a resident having a $150 charge sent to collections without notice or itemization, damaging her credit; stolen items from storage units were denied coverage despite lease language promising financial responsibility; and heavy noise from nearby bars affects sleep. Hidden fees add $100 monthly, surprising residents at lease renewal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Burnett Lofts
#114
60

Burnett Lofts

3.6(115)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents credit Burnett Lofts for its walkable downtown position, well-appointed apartments, and a capable maintenance team led by Derrick. The leasing staff (particularly Kayla, Landon, and Sarah) receive consistent praise for professionalism and attentiveness. A management change in spring 2025 is noted as turning around prior service gaps. However, older reviews and recent comments reveal persistent friction: the parking garage gate has repeatedly failed, leaving cars vulnerable to break-ins; callers struggle to reach the leasing office; and move-out security deposit disputes have stretched months without resolution. Noise from neighbors and delayed HVAC fixes appear in multiple accounts. New management has improved maintenance responsiveness, but office accessibility and security remain contentious.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Lofts at West 7th
#115
64

The Lofts at West 7th

3.7(295)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the leasing team-Shelley, Allen, Jacob, and Nicholas stood out for patience and personal attention-and note clean units and a stellar West 7th location near bars, restaurants, and Trinity Park. However, recent construction disruptions sparked frustration: night-shift workers reported demolition-level noise in adjacent units with no advance notice or help from management, who dismissed concerns as normal apartment living. One reviewer also flagged forced WiFi charges and worries about the area's future.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Park 7
#116
70

Park 7

4.1(61)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Park 7 residents consistently praise the responsiveness and warmth of staff, particularly recent management changes. Brooke, Camryn, and maintenance staff (Heath, Juan) earned repeated praise for solving problems quickly and communicating clearly. The location near downtown and West 7th, clean grounds, and upgraded units draw multiple mentions. One resident reported months-long delays on a broken key and a missing key for a new household member, plus confusion about advertised 24/7 package management. Most five-star reviewers note improvement under the new management team.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Crest Centreport Apartments
#117
55

Crest Centreport Apartments

1.9(146)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Months of waiting for repair requests, roaches thriving despite monthly pest control charges, and staff entering units without warning or notice define tenant experience here. The affordable rent attracts budget-conscious renters, but most feel trapped by hidden fees, ignored maintenance problems, and a leasing office more focused on charges than solutions.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Magnolia Park Apartments
#118
60

Magnolia Park Apartments

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Magnolia Park divides sharply: 72% of reviewers praise responsive staff, swift maintenance, and the West 7th location; leasing associates Camryn, Brooke, and Rikki are named repeatedly for going beyond move-in basics. However, 22% report persistent soundproofing failures in upper floors (units 302, 304 especially), and one recent guest with a service animal was fined $500, indicating management shifts that contradict earlier pet-friendly reputation. The complex handles maintenance within 24 hours and accommodates tenants thoughtfully, yet noise complaints span years unresolved and rent is cited as high relative to downtown options.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Westcliff Park Apartments
#119
55 low data

Westcliff Park Apartments

3.6(60)✓ Google-verified

Westcliff Park draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise staff warmth and affordability, yet serious complaints about delayed repairs, unresponsive management, and vehicle theft persist. Evidence is mixed: high-satisfaction residents highlight Emily, Thalia, and Jeanie's attentiveness, while others report months-long maintenance delays and security lapses the office failed to address or communicate.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Oxford at Lake Worth
#120
58

Oxford at Lake Worth

3.0(138)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most five-star reviewers praise the office team by name (Kristen, Kaylee, Tori, Aliza, Paula) for genuine warmth and swift maintenance turnarounds under 24 hours. The pet-friendly setup with two bark parks and scenic countryside appeal to dog owners. However, a vocal minority report systemic failures: pest control that sprays but never escalates, water leaks left unresolved until mold develops, and move-out charges of $600+ that don't count against stated deposits. One tenant described months of ignored maintenance requests; another was told management cannot honor scheduling requests for privacy-sensitive work. The rating spread (43% five-star, 49% one-to-two-star) reflects a sharp divide. Positive reviews center on recent improvements under current management and the peaceful rural setting. Negative reviews focus on unresolved structural problems, fee opacity, and the tension between friendly office staff and management's unwillingness or inability to fix underlying maintenance or communication issues. Staff turnover may explain some disparities in leasing agent behavior.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
South 400 Apartments
#121
69

South 400 Apartments

3.9(145)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the maintenance team's speed and professionalism, particularly Joan, who has built a reputation for quick fixes and genuine care. Staff at all levels (leasing, front office, grounds) are consistently described as friendly and responsive, and common areas are well-maintained. The pool and gym are well-regarded. However, package theft is rampant due to an unguarded external mailroom, and some residents report security lapses (broken elevators, open garage gates). Move-in procedures lack coordination. Some describe the community as unsafe and dirty despite the strong staff presence. The contrast between excellent personal service and systemic security failures defines the mixed experience here.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Borough Apartments
#122
63

The Borough Apartments

3.7(196)✓ Google-verified

Residents report a stark divide between hiring and leasing staff who are genuinely helpful, and an unstable management situation that has deteriorated significantly. Multiple property managers have cycled through, leaving communication broken and maintenance issues unaddressed. Water damage recurs in several units, mold problems go unremedied, and pest infestations (roaches and rats) persist without adequate treatment. The office is frequently unreachable. Tenants with housing vouchers and good staff interactions rate highly; those facing infrastructure failures and communication blackouts rate the complex critically.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Ryan Apartments
#123
59

The Ryan Apartments

3.4(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong staff like Cory and Chasity deliver seamless leasing and quick maintenance for many residents, earning consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness. Yet the complex struggles with systemic issues: pest infestations ignored by management, safety problems (gunshots, break-ins), and surprise fees that surface after move-in. Some long-term residents have watched conditions decline sharply over the past year. The dog park and fitness center appeal to those who prioritize amenities, but the management overhaul has not yet won back tenants facing AC failures and unresolved building maintenance.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Mag & May
#124
69

Mag & May

4.1(158)✓ Google-verified

Mag & May has a stark split: maintenance staff are reliable and fast, leasing tours feel welcoming, and the Magnolia location scores high on walkability. But residents report chronic management failures: double charging for insurance despite proof, month-long unanswered voicemails, lost applications, and slow move-in readiness. The application process overwhelms the small office team, leaving applicants in limbo for weeks. Tenants also flag safety gaps-garage doors stay broken for months, packages vanish, and homeless activity around the property raises concerns. Some long-term residents praise earlier management, suggesting service quality dropped after recent staff changes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Drake on Summit Apartments
#125
62

The Drake on Summit Apartments

3.8(208)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise individual staff members and the range of amenities, but maintenance and cleanliness have deteriorated sharply. Multiple reviewers report filthy move-in units, mold painted over rather than fixed, repeated AC failures, and overflowing trash in common areas. Security is a concern: break-ins occur, the parking garage lacks patrols, and management seldom responds to calls. The courtesy officer rarely picks up. A few long-term residents who moved in earlier had better experiences; recent arrivals and those facing mold or safety issues describe management as dismissive and unresponsive, with move-out charges applied without photo evidence. The standout staff members Chris, Kelly, and Ty are consistently mentioned for their helpfulness, and amenities like the 24-hour gym and sky deck are valued. However, operational failures-fire alarms going off daily, doors left propped open, elevators reeking-overwhelm these positives. Reviewers advise documenting everything, using a specific payment system to avoid fees, and verifying move-out conditions in writing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District
#126
68

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

4.0(204)✓ Google-verified

Trinity Urban offers affordable apartments with genuine community spirit, though maintenance reliability and building systems are significant pain points. Staff like Juan and Kiana actively organize events that help residents connect, and pricing beats expectations for the location. Recurring complaints about non-working air conditioning, elevator outages, and delayed maintenance responses suggest operational gaps that undercut the otherwise welcoming atmosphere.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Valley View
#127
57

Valley View

3.3(96)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the staff's responsiveness and the value for square footage, with managers like Yadira, Milan, and maintenance worker Luis earning repeated recognition. However, cockroach and bedbug infestations plague multiple units, parking limitations require fees for visitors, and several tenants report management prioritizes fees over resolving their own errors.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
Monticello Crossroads
#128
62

Monticello Crossroads

3.7(141)✓ Google-verified

Monticello Crossroads has split into two distinct periods. Under recent management (Roger, Johan, and maintenance lead Javier), residents report friendly, responsive service and visible improvements. However, deeper issues persist: maintenance backlogs, unresolved pest infestations, chronic trash overflows, and a history of management instability create real daily hardship for longer-term residents. Newer residents praise the turnaround; those with ongoing problems report feeling ignored by corporate ownership and blame-shifted to office staff. Specific problems include unanswered maintenance requests marked resolved without completion, rats in units, no on-site maintenance availability, billing disputes sent to collections, and parking spaces consumed by company waste containers. Language barriers in the leasing office compound communication troubles. The complex appears to have been through corporate management challenges and a past television intervention attempt. Current staff appear engaged, but systemic issues suggest surface improvement may not address underlying operations problems.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Linwood Square
#129
61

Linwood Square

3.8(66)✓ Google-verified

Linwood Square draws mixed experiences tied to affordability and social community, though upkeep and management responsiveness remain ongoing friction points. Staff like Myra, Angelica, and Chonda earn praise for genuine care, and residents value granite counters, included utilities, and pet policies. However, complaints span dirty common areas, maintenance delays, staff professionalism issues, and record-keeping lapses that have left applicants restarts from zero.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
The Residences of Diamond Hill
#130
52

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(144)✓ Google-verified

The complex is beset by slow maintenance response and tenant behavior problems. Work orders sit open for months, AC systems fail in heat, and water damage causing mold remains unfixed even when officially marked "resolved". Noise from children and poor neighbor management drive many to leave. A few staff members like Christy Mullins and Jackie/Scarlett stand out, but overall communication from the office is poor, calls go unreturned, and residents feel the property prioritizes rent over their wellbeing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Griffin Apartments
#131
66

The Griffin Apartments

3.9(203)✓ Google-verified

Staff stars like Christina and Angel earn repeat praise for going beyond expectations during moves and repairs. Many residents report swift, professional help with maintenance and leasing. However, a substantial block of recent arrivals encountered serious move-in problems: roaches, mold, broken appliances, and dirty units. Several complaints cite unresponsive management, ignored maintenance requests, and deposit disputes where the complex allegedly kept money despite approval policy reversals. One tenant faced documented code violations that were never repaired during tenancy.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Bella Via Apartments
#132
56

Bella Via Apartments

3.4(77)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff like Diana, Jennifer, and Johana earn consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness, and move-ins are often clean and timely. However, residents report unresolved noise complaints from neighbors, lagging maintenance fixes, and collection agency friction after lease breaks, alongside concerns about access protocols and nearby crime.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Sansom Bluff Apartments
#133
60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(195)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff splits sharply: residents consistently praise the buildings, pool, and events, especially when dealing with named staff like Kasundra, Rosetta, or Hunter. The complex struggles with management turnover and office professionalism. Multiple tenants report rudeness from current office staff, trouble reaching leasing by phone, and suddenly higher rents with added charges; one resident reported roach infestation and unresolved water quality complaints since move-in. The property attracts families and pet owners drawn to its spacious units and grounds. Quality hinges entirely on which staff member handles your request: beloved individuals like Rosetta and Hunter get five-star praise for responsiveness and care, while recent office transitions have left others frustrated by dismissive, evasive management and communication breakdowns.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
CoHo Apartments
#134
65 low data

CoHo Apartments

4.4(23)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents love the walkable South Main location, quick maintenance response, and the high-tech Ori furniture that appeals to minimalists. Recent concerns center on management transitions: security deposits held beyond Texas law timelines, AC failures not properly repaired, and broken gate access. Strongest reviews praise named staff like Kim, Tony, and Camryn. Weakest highlight legal and safety oversights under newer management.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Maxwell Apartments
#135
60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(337)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff Alice and manager Veronica consistently earn praise for friendliness and thorough help during tours and move-in, making the application process smooth and welcoming for most applicants. However, residents report significant gaps once they move in: emergency maintenance responds slowly even in heat emergencies, repair requests languish unresolved (AC, dishwashers, rotting wood), and some face pest infestations and noise from other units. Disputes over deposit retention and application fee practices appear in multiple complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Sansom Ridge Apartments
#136
64

Sansom Ridge Apartments

4.2(46)✓ Google-verified

Sansom Ridge draws strong loyalty for its affordable rents, spacious units, and standout staff members like Rosetta and Sabrina who run a food pantry and host community events. Management has failed residents during payment disputes, pest problems persist despite requests, trash accumulates around the property, and break-ins plus package theft remain unresolved despite on-site cameras. The complex excels at ground-level support but struggles with accountability at the office level. Maintenance staff like Bren'Sha earn high marks for professionalism. Quiet on the surface, the community faces underlying safety and upkeep issues that management has not addressed across multiple resident tenures.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Bexley at Left Bank
#137
65

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(226)✓ Google-verified

Bexley at Left Bank draws sharp contrasts in resident experience. Maintenance staff, especially Erin, earn consistent praise for fast, responsive work and genuine care. Yet office communication falters: tenants report ignored calls, billing errors, and slow resolutions that require in-person visits. Sound insulation is a real problem, with neighbors' voices, music, and pets clearly audible. Rent jumps of $600-$800 after year one are steep when the same unit rents lower to new arrivals. The property offers genuinely nice amenities, a prime location, and staff who smile when they show up. But behind the attractive facade sit construction gaps, a broken garage gate in extended repair cycles, and an office that shifts into low gear once you renew. Strong maintenance and weak management make this a mixed bag: arrive with eyes open about noise, expect office friction, but know your unit repairs will get done right.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Kimberly Apartments
#138
64

The Kimberly Apartments

3.8(236)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Kimberly draws strong loyalty from residents who praise staff like Stephanie, Karina, and maintenance crew Noe and Adan for quick, attentive service. However, a vocal minority report roach and spider infestations, slow repairs despite paid valet trash, outdated flooring and appliances that contradict online images, and reception delays that frustrated prospective tenants. CAF Management's recent takeover appears to have improved office operations for some, though pest control and move-in transparency remain pain points. Word-of-mouth varies sharply based on which staff member handles your request and whether you prioritise budget over finish quality. Affordability at $865–$1,190/month attracts budget-conscious renters, but several report the complex's cheap finishes and inadequate pest management undercut the perceived value. Long-time residents (since 2016) stay put; newer tenants weigh cost against disappointment. First-apartment renters often discover they need to tour in person rather than trust online videos. Valet trash, dog parks, and fitness centres appeal on paper, but residents dispute the valet trash's actual delivery and upkeep of advertised amenities.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments
#139
59

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

4.2(17)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the modern apartments, location near downtown and Newby Park, and quick maintenance response from named staff like Camryn and Willie. Several tenants lived happily for years. However, move-out billing practices have triggered serious disputes, including allegations of unclear charges sent to collections without itemized explanations. The property has no gated parking or on-site amenities, and sits next to active train tracks.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Slate at Fort Worth Apartments
#140
59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(112)✓ Google-verified

New management since February 2026 has revitalized the property with rapid repairs, remodeling, and reopened amenities like the pool. Meshun Davis, the current manager, receives consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, reviews from 2023 to 2024 reveal a troubled history of roach infestations, security deposit withholding, communication breakdowns, and unclean units under previous ownership.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Crest at River District Apartments
#141
58 low data

Crest at River District Apartments

3.7(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Modern apartments in River District with a strong location near restaurants and trails, but experiences vary sharply. Five-star reviewers praise Carlos and maintenance speed; one-star users report pest problems, delayed repairs, and unclear ESA accommodation policies.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Prescott Park Apartment Homes
#142
63

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

3.7(570)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Prescott Park divides sharply: leasing staff excel at tours and applications, and once moved in, maintenance responds quickly to repair requests. The apartments themselves offer good floor plans and affordability. But residents hit a wall after signing. Roach infestations are persistent despite regular spraying, office phones go unanswered for days, billing surprises arrive regularly (undisclosed fees, duplicate charges), and management becomes dismissive when residents ask questions or complain. The facility grounds are clean and the location near Randol Mill Park works well. Staff like Bianca, Maricela, and Alejandra earn consistent five-star praise for leasing. Yet for every welcoming tour experience, a tenant reports a rattlesnake in the living room, a week-long roof repair, uncommunicative billing, or a management team that feels "professional when they want you to sign but rude after."

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Villas at 1404 Apartments
#143
63

Villas at 1404 Apartments

3.8(163)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tenants report starkly different experiences. Half praise the leasing staff, especially Jewel and Nana, for making the sign-up smooth and responsive maintenance requests. The other half describe a gap between advertised amenities (in-unit washer/dryer, central AC, private patios) and what arrives, along with mounting hidden charges for internet, pest control, and parking. Most damaging are recurring complaints about overgrown grounds, rat and snake sightings, and untreated roach problems that persist despite pest control visits. The 3.8-star rating masks this split: 65% five-star reviews celebrate staff warmth, while 28% one-star reviews cite habitability failures. Recent reviews show ongoing AC breakdowns and grounds issues. One positive: when maintenance staff like Anthony engage fully, repairs happen quickly, but lack of support suggests staffing gaps. Affordability draws renters, but many report the advertised price masks extra charges accumulating monthly.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Carmel Creekside Apartments
#144
63

Carmel Creekside Apartments

3.7(347)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the location, cleanliness, and handful of exceptional staff members like Paige, who genuinely help tenants navigate issues. However, a persistent pattern emerges: AC units fail monthly and go weeks unrepaired, management ignores escalations, roof leaks are left unchecked, noise complaints bring no resolution, and residents report safety incidents including shootings. Multiple tenants cite hidden fees that push actual rent far above advertised rates. The leasing office makes strong first impressions with friendly application help, but maintenance responses become minimal once you move in. Repairs either drag on indefinitely or contractors do poor work. Several long-term residents who loved the community at first eventually left due to compounded maintenance failures and management's refusal to treat concerns seriously.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Sunset Heights Apartments
#145
57

Sunset Heights Apartments

3.5(51)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Bree and Tiarra earn genuine praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, and the location draws people who value proximity to downtown and quiet surroundings. However, persistent pest issues (roaches, fleas), sluggish maintenance response, frequent management changes, and complaints about noise and poorly maintained grounds undercut the experience for many long-term residents. Expect inconsistency.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
West 7th Apartments
#146
49 low data

West 7th Apartments

3.6(30)

Staff like Zoraya, Chris, Latoya, and Astra Management earn praise for friendliness and effort, and the courtyard and gardens appeal to those seeking calm. Serious flaws undercut the setting: repeated AC breakdowns, weeks-long repair waits even in summer heat, mold in flooded units, and trash buildup from weekly cleaning cycles make this risky for anyone with low tolerance for maintenance gaps or heat sensitivity.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Taylor Commons
#147
62

Taylor Commons

3.6(133)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and recent arrivals consistently praise the new management team (Cory and Kamitia) for transforming the community into a quieter, more responsive place. Maintenance staff, especially Tim, resolve issues quickly and professionally. However, a small but vocal group reports vehicle break-ins, personal item theft during moves, and inconsistent staff behavior. Security and trust remain unresolved friction points that overshadow the positive operational changes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hulen Park Place Townhomes
#148
62

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

3.8(101)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Hulen Park Place is deeply divided. Long-term residents praise its quiet layout and occasional responsive maintenance, but recent reviews describe chronic flooding, pest infestations, and a manager perceived as dismissive and difficult. The gap between five-star and one-star accounts suggests either significant recent deterioration or sharply different treatment by staff. Move-in conditions have disappointed renters, with dirty units and broken systems; one tenant reported an unusually fast resolution after initial complaint. Security deposit disputes and office inaccessibility frustrate tenants trying to resolve routine matters. The maintenance staff itself draws consistent praise, but management's willingness to prioritise repairs appears inconsistent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Historic Electric Building Apartments
#149
62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
McCart Apartments
#150
61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Clifton Riverside
#151
55

Clifton Riverside

3.7(22)✓ Google-verified

Early residents praised the new riverside location, modern units, and helpful leasing staff. Within months, experience degraded sharply: common areas grew dirty despite the 2023 build date, staff became hostile and inconsistent, and maintenance requests stalled. Security cameras remain absent while management enforces parking and trash rules unevenly. The complex marketed as luxury is undermined by overcrowding (80+ residents, 6 visitor spots), weed odor seeping into units, and a foundation shift since opening. Staff turnover appears severe, with praise directed at earlier employees like Shelby and Shelly, while recent hires drew repeated complaints. Reviewers note the office often closes, leaving questions unresolved. Rent disputes at move-in (promised $1,450, charged $1,800) and selective enforcement of pet and smoking policies fuel frustration. The lakeside setting and gym concept attract residents, but those amenities are rarely usable due to theft, limited hours, or disrepair.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
The Foundry
#152
56

The Foundry

3.0(94)✓ Google-verified

Half of reviewers praise the office team-especially manager Mary and leasing consultant Kristi-for attentive service and quick maintenance response. They highlight a clean, quiet community with functional amenities. The other half report months-long maintenance backlogs, pervasive roach infestations despite pest control, non-functional laundry equipment, and failures to address water damage and mold. Pool hours consistently do not match posted times. Recent five-star reviews center on staff personality and responsiveness; one-star reviews span infrastructure failures, pest neglect, and inadequate emergency protocols. A three-year resident reports individual positive experiences with efficient management but acknowledges the pest and guest-parking issues others describe. The gap between best and worst experiences is stark.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marine Park Apartments
#153
59 low data

Marine Park Apartments

3.7(76)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff receive consistent praise for professionalism and attentiveness, with several reviewers naming Cecelia, Alejandra, Kaira, Denasia, and others for going above and beyond during the application and tour process. Yet residents report severe soundproofing issues, an 8pm noise curfew, and past administrative lapses that left someone without housing after a family death.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments
#154
47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Morningside Apartments
#155
59

Morningside Apartments

3.6(65)✓ Google-verified

Management and leasing staff, especially Maria and Juan, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and problem-solving. Recent administrative changes have notably improved resident satisfaction and maintenance responsiveness. However, recurring complaints center on aging infrastructure: pest problems, mold, leaks, and slow fixes on critical systems like heating. Some residents report year-long repair waits. The gap between enthusiastic recent reviews and older complaints suggests either real improvements underway or inconsistent execution across different maintenance issues and timeframes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Franklin at Samuels Avenue
#156
59

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

3.3(245)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff receive consistent praise for friendliness and attentiveness during tours, and the downtown location near Sundance Square appeals to prospective residents. However, actual tenants report serious problems: AC failures lasting weeks even in extreme heat, maintenance delays, unreturned calls and emails, security breaches (unlocked building entrances, stolen packages and vehicle parts), filthy common areas, and management billing disputes. Staff inconsistency and documentation errors compound resident frustration; many long-term tenants report years of unresolved issues and repeated fee disputes. The disconnect between the leasing experience and tenant reality is stark. While some technicians (Bryce, Miguel, Tyler) receive individual praise, the broader operation struggles with accountability. Move-in units often lack basic readiness, emergency repairs take days despite heat exceeding 90 degrees, and management rarely responds to escalations. Residents note a pattern of management turnover that leaves lease discrepancies unresolved and documentation poorly handled.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Spring Glen Apartments
#157
46 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen draws long-term residents who value the peaceful setting and responsive management, though the pool's chronic closure frustrates prospects counting on that amenity. Evidence is limited to brief reviews spanning several years, with mixed satisfaction tilting toward stability for those already settled in.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Crestwood Place Apartments
#158
53

Crestwood Place Apartments

3.5(83)✓ Google-verified

Crestwood Place draws praise for rare staff members like Michele and Joannah who deliver genuine care, and its low rents appeal to budget-conscious tenants. Yet the overwhelming experience is neglect: roaches, leaking fixtures, sewage odors, and units painted over decades go unaddressed for months. Management has cycled through multiple companies; office hours shrink while fees grow. Long-time residents report a sharp decline since 2023, with the property rumored for redevelopment as 55+ senior housing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Western Hills Apartments
#159
57 low data

Western Hills Apartments

4.1(56)✓ Google-verified

Many residents find this complex peaceful with well-kept grounds and responsive maintenance. Recent concerns include rude phone interactions, lease paperwork mix-ups, and one tenant's allegation of discriminatory treatment.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Spur Canyon Apartments
#160
53

Spur Canyon Apartments

3.3(322)✓ Google-verified

Spur Canyon's 3.3 rating masks a sharp divide: five-star tours with leasing agent Jermaine contrast starkly against relentless one-star complaints from residents. Renters report catastrophic maintenance failures, with unit flooding unrepaired for weeks despite multiple requests, AC inoperable in summer heat, and bathroom water damage exposing interior ceiling structures. Raccoons nest in walls and attics, roaches and gnats infest units, and rotten exterior wood with exposed rusty nails creates safety hazards. Management avoids accountability, the emergency maintenance line does not work, and residents describe unanswered calls and runaround denials of lease termination. Fees climb unexpectedly ($192 in surprise charges noted), and trash accumulates visibly across parking lots. Staff member Amelia received isolated praise for follow-through, but the overwhelming pattern is unlivable conditions masked by promotional photos reviewers called fraudulent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Gardens At Cobb Park
#161
56 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Fort West Apartments
#162
46

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments struggles with fundamental maintenance and management failures that create unsafe living conditions. Tenants report raw sewage backups lasting months, unchecked roach infestations, mold, and flooded units with no follow-up. The property management is consistently unreachable; complaints go unanswered and maintenance requests stall indefinitely. A controversial towing policy charges $350 per vehicle despite unclear registration procedures, and the office is often vacant. A handful of long-term residents praise quiet periods and responsive staff, but they appear to be exceptions in a complex marked by code violations, inadequate staffing, and systemic neglect.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Leuda May Apartments
#163
54

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Sorrento
#164
54

Sorrento

3.4(420)✓ Google-verified

Sorrento splits sharply between positive leasing encounters and poor day-to-day living conditions. Staff members like Gia, Beth, and Lily receive praise for professionalism and warmth during move-in, but once residents settle in, maintenance delays dominate complaints. Multiple reviewers waited weeks for AC repairs, six months for dryer vent fixes, and months for water damage recovery. Security failures-broken gates and unresolved vehicle thefts-compound frustration. Communication collapses across channels: phone lines go unanswered, emails are ignored, and management changes (from Knightvest to Greystar to BH to BHLife) correlate with deteriorating conditions. Noise, weed smoking, mold, and inflated utility bills remain unaddressed despite repeated requests. The property's reputation has decayed steeply under recent management. Long-term residents note a clear shift downward; early positives (fitness center, pool, attached garages) become hollow promises when gates fail to function "more than two days total" and pools close indefinitely for repair. Residents describe outdated units, ruined belongings (AC fluid damage, clothing stained by secondhand smoke), and feeling trapped paying premium rent for broken infrastructure. The single bright spot-a third-party contractor who fixed multiple issues in one visit-underscores that management itself is the bottleneck.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Moderne
#165
53

The Moderne

3.3(25)✓ Google-verified

The Moderne splits sharply between recent positive reviews citing responsive staff and a well-managed turnaround, and older negative accounts of filthy move-ins, ignored maintenance requests, and Airbnb chaos. New management appears to have improved responsiveness, but cleanliness and security issues persist in some reports. Location near West 7th and Montgomery Plaza appeals, though pricing and policy transparency draw criticism.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Alton Park Apartments
#166
50

Alton Park Apartments

3.3(74)✓ Google-verified

Alton Park has a split identity: the best reviews praise staff like Ms. Alexis and Ms. Charlene for going above and beyond during move-in, and tenants note nice patios and grounds. Most reviews, however, describe an overwhelming pattern of mismanagement. Application processing stretched months with shifting requirements and incomplete guidance, leading some applicants to homelessness. Current residents report unresponsive maintenance for serious issues (broken refrigerators with pests, non-working AC, fire-hazard wiring), retaliation from managers, an unstaffed office that rarely answers calls, and amenities like the pool closed during work hours. Rent increases applied to income-restricted units add to the frustration.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Travis Gardens Apartments
#167
48 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
TB
#168
43 low data

The Berkeley

3.4(5)

The Berkeley shows a stark divide in visitor experiences, with staff responsiveness praised in one account but a recent tour marred by cold reception, dirty common areas, and lack of effort. Cleaning happens only twice yearly, and recent management changes have tightened guest and pool access without resident input.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Autumn Chase Apartments
#169
35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.1(57)

Autumn Chase splits sharply between five-star praise for office staff kindness and swift repairs, and one/two-star complaints about persistent sewage leaks, roaches, slow maintenance despite promises, visitor parking fees, and a high-crime neighborhood with constant police calls. The property has cycled through multiple management teams in short periods, leaving tenants uncertain which experience they will get.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Fairway Apartments
#170
37 low data

Fairway Apartments

2.7(16)✓ Google-verified

Fairway's rating of 2.7 out of 5 reflects deep frustration with maintenance neglect and building condition. Long-term residents report repeated flooding, plumbing failures, pest control gaps, and safety concerns that go unresolved despite rent increases. While staff like manager Sandy earn individual praise for effort, the complex lacks consistent on-site presence and accessible support channels. Security is a recurring issue, with homeless activity on the property continuing despite efforts to deter it. The affordable pricing and pet-friendly welcome do not outweigh the documented quality-of-life problems.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
University Villas Apartments
#171
38 low data

University Villas Apartments

2.8(10)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews describe widespread maintenance failures, pest infestations, and management issues over multiple years. A handful of older reviews praise affordability and community, but the preponderance of evidence paints a picture of a property where significant problems are not addressed quickly or properly.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Park Terrace Apartment
#172
33 low data

Park Terrace Apartment

2.7(13)

Park Terrace shows significant dissatisfaction: 54% of reviews are one or two stars, with tenants citing poor communication, outdated apartments, and trash on grounds. Maintenance staff Steve is praised for responsiveness, but management and front-desk interactions are frequently described as disrespectful or dismissive.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Featured partners for apartment availability

How many apartments do you want to compare?

By sending this enquiry, you agree it will be shared with the leasing office, apartment community, or property manager contacts relevant to your request.

Enquiries submitted through this site's forms may be shared with partner providers who can do the work, and we may receive a referral fee. Our rankings and scores are based on our published method only and are not affected by referral fees.

Common questions about pet-friendly apartments

How much do pet-friendly apartments in Fort Worth typically charge for pets?
Expect a one-time pet fee anywhere from $200 to $500, plus monthly pet rent commonly in the $15 to $35 per pet range. Some properties add a refundable pet deposit on top of the fee, others charge only one of the three. Always ask for the total monthly and move-in cost broken out separately from your base rent.
Do most Fort Worth apartments have breed or weight restrictions?
Yes, breed and weight limits are common and usually tied to the property's liability insurance. Restricted breeds often include Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, Dobermans, and German Shepherds, and weight caps of 50 to 80 pounds show up frequently. Ask for the written pet policy rather than relying on what a leasing agent tells you verbally.
What amenities should I expect from a genuinely pet-friendly complex?
Look for a fenced dog park (ideally separated by size), pet waste stations spaced around the property, and easy ground-floor or elevator access if you have an older or larger dog. Some newer Fort Worth communities also offer pet wash stations, which save a lot of hassle after muddy walks.
How do I judge whether a complex actually enforces its pet rules well?
Check recent resident reviews for mentions of unleashed dogs, waste left on walkways, or noise complaints going unaddressed. A well-run pet-friendly property usually has visible signage, regular grounds maintenance around pet areas, and a leasing office that can answer policy questions without hesitation.

Last updated 2026-07-24