Pet-Friendly Apartments in Greater Fort Worth

Page 3 of 3: businesses ranked 201-245 of 245. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

Sansom Ridge Apartments

#201

62

Sansom Ridge Apartments

4.1(47)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Rosetta, Bren'Sha, Sabrina, and Lisa earn consistent praise for friendliness and genuine helpfulness. The property offers spacious units, a food pantry, community events, and quiet grounds at an affordable price. However, residents report serious maintenance gaps: roach infestations staff cannot control, trash accumulation, package theft from unlocked office storage, and parking lot safety concerns (unsupervised children, car break-ins, towing company damage). Office management has been unresponsive to payment questions and resident concerns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Union at River East

#202

62

The Union at River East

3.7(234)✓ Google-verified

Staff members Orlando and Ryan earn consistent five-star praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, while the maintenance team responds quickly when called. The complex offers appealing amenities: infinity-edge pool, co-working space, outdoor seating, and flexible floor plans on a prime Race Street location. Yet rent at $1,800+ monthly brings high expectations the property has struggled to meet. Residents report a broken garage gate left unfixed for months, creating security gaps and theft. Management has been slow or dismissive on disability accommodations, key fob access failures, and billing errors. Move-in readiness and building access control remain friction points despite recent signs of operational improvement.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Westmount at River Park Apartments

#203

53

Westmount at River Park Apartments

3.4(218)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Westmount at River Park is split sharply between strong praise for leasing staff and deep frustration with management, maintenance, and condition. Long-term residents cite repeated turnover in management, inconsistent policies, unresponsive offices, hidden fees that weren't refunded, and deteriorating units. The pool has stayed closed for months despite being a resident priority, the workout room smells bad, and in-unit amenities like washers and hot water fail or were never installed as promised. Staff at the leasing desk earn consistent five-star reviews for helpfulness. Those staying report feeling safe but exhausted by the complex's rigid policies and slow repairs. The business advertises one- and two-bedroom options with pet services, a fitness center, and coffee bar. Their website lists special move-in offers. In practice, reviewers say move-in deals go unpaid, parking is heavily restricted, and maintenance requests languish. One tenant with strong payment history faced eviction proceedings after requesting a single payment delay. Newer residents sometimes report good initial experiences; longer-term occupants describe escalating frustration with unresponsive management and inability to reach named staff like Brittany.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

#204

57

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

3.4(149)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sandshell divides sharply. Those staying long-term praise the quiet grounds, pool events, and genuinely helpful staff members like Hailey and Garrett. But newer residents hit a wall fast: cockroaches carpet the laundromat, mice run across floors, ants infest bathrooms, and mold hangs in the air. Water cuts off for hours without warning, parking enforcement tows cars at 1 a.m. with no advance notice, and move-out inspections generate five-figure damage charges that reviewers say don't match photos they took. The complex bills itself as luxury on its website, but reviews describe it as poorly maintained, aging apartments sold at premium prices. One long-term resident's later review warns that management uses move-out inspections to retain deposits aggressively. Multiple reviewers mention switching to nearby alternatives like The Hadley because pest and infrastructure problems go unresolved for weeks or months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Crest at River District Apartments

#205

57 low data

Crest at River District Apartments

3.6(31)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Crest at River District draws praise for modern units, helpful staff like Carlos and Johnny, and a quiet location near restaurants and trails. However, some tenants report slow repairs on serious damage, poor management responsiveness, noise complaints from neighboring residents, pest problems, and frustration over ESA breed restrictions that may conflict with Fair Housing protections. Experiences vary considerably depending on when you move in and which staff members you work with.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments

#206

49 low data

West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments

4.3(7)✓ Google-verified

Tenants praise updated interiors and solid upkeep despite the building's age. Limited recent feedback makes trends hard to assess.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

#207

61

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

3.7(572)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The leasing team, especially Bianca, earns consistent praise for friendliness and ease of signing up. Once moved in, residents discover a sharp divide: responsive maintenance staff and pleasant floor plans offset ongoing pest problems, water issues, and an office that becomes hard to reach after the lease is signed. Billing surprises and hidden fees (Lease Lock, deposits, move-out charges) catch residents off guard. Roach infestations appear recurrent across units, along with foundation problems and wildlife. Parking fills quickly after 8 PM, and management prioritizes enforcement over transparent communication with tenants.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

McCart Apartments

#208

61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

West 7th Apartments

#209

48 low data

West 7th Apartments

3.6(30)

Staff like Zoraya, Chris, Latoya, and Astra Management earn praise for friendliness and effort, and the courtyard and gardens appeal to those seeking calm. Serious flaws undercut the setting: repeated AC breakdowns, weeks-long repair waits even in summer heat, mold in flooded units, and trash buildup from weekly cleaning cycles make this risky for anyone with low tolerance for maintenance gaps or heat sensitivity.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Encore on Mustang Apartments

#210

61

The Encore on Mustang Apartments

3.6(152)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviewers praise staff like Silvia, Norma, and Karina for going above and beyond during tours and move-ins, noting clean units and quiet surroundings. One-star reviewers report roach problems, communication breakdowns, surprise move-out charges without explanation, and towed cars, painting a starkly different picture of the same complex. The gap between experiences suggests inconsistency in how the complex handles maintenance, enforcement, and resident relations. Newer residents or those who engaged closely with office staff report satisfaction, while longer-term residents face mounting frustrations with pests, utilities, and administrative practices.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Reserve at Quebec

#211

59

Reserve at Quebec

3.0(209)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviews highlight a maintenance team that shows up fast and treats residents well, especially Tony and Luis who earn repeated praise. Residents who stay long-term describe a quiet, family-friendly place with attentive staff. However, a parallel stream of one-star complaints focuses on months-long repair delays, failed emergency calls (sewage backups left unresolved), unresponsive management after promises are made, and a recent billing scare where a resident faced collection action after her lease ended. The split is stark: those praising the community and maintenance crew versus those trapped in repair limbo with indifferent office staff. Property remains affordable and pet-friendly, but the gap between maintenance responsiveness and office follow-through creates a lottery feel. Families and seniors considering this location should ask specifically about AC and emergency repair timelines before signing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

#212

54

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

3.1(423)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Amanda and Arthur shine during leasing, but the property itself struggles badly. Reviewers report months-long AC outages, non-functioning laundry, roach infestations, water damage, broken amenities, and pavement with large holes. Management does not respond to complaints or code violations, and tenants describe unit conditions so poor they postponed move-ins. One five-star reviewer praised Eric in maintenance for fixing multiple issues in a single visit, yet others say maintenance walks around smoking instead of addressing requests. The gap between leasing experience and living experience is stark. Tenants across multiple reviews mention feeling trapped: unprepared units, delayed move-ins, eviction notices despite rent credits for unlivable conditions, and corporate silence. This complex carries serious red flags for anyone without a strong alternative.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Marine Park Apartments

#213

59 low data

Marine Park Apartments

3.7(77)✓ Google-verified

Staff earns consistent praise for helpfulness and professionalism, with several tenants naming specific team members who eased their move-in. Serious soundproofing issues and aggressive upfront screening frustrate some prospective and current renters.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Spur Canyon Apartments

#214

54

Spur Canyon Apartments

3.3(324)✓ Google-verified

Spur Canyon's 3.3 rating reflects a property in crisis. While leasing agent Jermaine earns consistent praise for tour friendliness and technician Brandon received credit for swift AC repair, nearly 40 percent of reviews are one or two stars. Residents report months-long waits for AC fixes in summer heat, repeated flooding, rotten wood falling outside, raccoons in walls, and roaches inside. Fees surprise tenants, management avoids accountability, and the emergency maintenance line does not answer. Multiple reviewers say the property is unsafe and regret signing leases. The complex is 50 years old and shows it. Exterior damage, water ingress, pest infestation, and lack of emergency response form the core complaint. One resident reported waiting four months for repairs after flooding on November 4, 2024, with no resolution as of June 2026. Another pregnant tenant terminated her lease after a two-week wait for AC in 93-degree heat. Residents say the advertising misrepresents the unit and location condition. Staff turnover has made management worse since a new manager arrived.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

#215

47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

#216

59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(114)✓ Google-verified

Slate has split sharply along a management change: since March 2026, tenants praise responsive staff (especially Meshun Davis), active renovations, and the reopened pool. Before that shift, residents faced pest problems, mold, poor communication, and unresolved maintenance issues. The location near Fort Worth groceries and highways and cleaning standards are strengths when managed well. New tenants report smooth leasing tours; long-term residents from the pre-2026 era warn against the property entirely.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sunset Pointe Apartments

#217

58

Sunset Pointe Apartments

3.3(208)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews praise staff by name (Becky, Beverly) and report pleasant stays; longer residents recall good years before 2023. One-star reviews detail years of ignored maintenance requests, unresolved plumbing failures, pest infestations they were charged to treat, mystery cable billing, and management that avoids accountability. Some five-star reviewers acknowledge the mixed picture but credit staff effort for improvements. The gap mirrors the rating spread itself: enthusiastic five-stars versus deeply frustrated long-term tenants who report management declining since late 2023, inconsistent maintenance response, and charges for repairs typically the landlord's duty. Responsiveness varies dramatically by staff member.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Morningside Apartments

#218

58

Morningside Apartments

3.6(65)✓ Google-verified

Management and leasing staff, especially Maria and Juan, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and problem-solving. Recent administrative changes have notably improved resident satisfaction and maintenance responsiveness. However, recurring complaints center on aging infrastructure: pest problems, mold, leaks, and slow fixes on critical systems like heating. Some residents report year-long repair waits. The gap between enthusiastic recent reviews and older complaints suggests either real improvements underway or inconsistent execution across different maintenance issues and timeframes.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Siddons Place Apartments

#219

58

Siddons Place Apartments

3.8(26)✓ Google-verified

Residents who stayed long-term often felt at home here, appreciating staff who care and enough space for families. Persistent issues with pool closures and roaches, plus a reported deposit retention problem, tempered satisfaction for some.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

#220

58

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

3.4(246)✓ Google-verified

Staff treat tour-goers with genuine warmth and stay engaged during leasing, earning consistent praise for their time and professionalism. After move-in, the experience fractures: tenants report months of broken AC during 90-degree heat, non-functional security gates and locks that anyone can bypass, trash piling on floors with roaches present, and management that becomes unreachable by phone or email. Billing disputes linger unresolved, with some tenants sent to collections over contested charges; record-keeping errors persist across management transitions.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Celine

#221

58

The Celine

2.7(224)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth and apartment size draw people in; five-star reviewers praise named team members like Selena, Crystal, and Lauren for attentiveness and quick responses. The darker side emerges quickly: residents report unbearable summer heat with blocked AC requests, move-in units crawling with roaches and stripped of water, maintenance tickets logged but never completed, and a pattern of hidden fees stacking advertised rent to nearly 20% higher. Security failures (car break-ins, improper towing) and withheld deposits pile onto the frustration. Recent management changes hint at systemic turnover. Some residents who stick it out a year report positive experiences; others flee before their lease ends or pursue legal action. The split between five-star and one/two-star reviews (40% vs 55%) reflects this divide: you either hit responsive management and avoid major repairs, or you land in a unit needing work that never materializes and a lease office that ghosts you.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Spring Glen Apartments

#222

46 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen draws long-term residents who value the peaceful setting and responsive management, though the pool's chronic closure frustrates prospects counting on that amenity. Evidence is limited to brief reviews spanning several years, with mixed satisfaction tilting toward stability for those already settled in.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Park West Apartments

#223

57

Park West Apartments

3.8(20)✓ Google-verified

Park West's reputation has split sharply along timeline lines. Residents who arrived or renewed within the last few months praise a new management team (Anthony, Tammy, Christina, Elena, Calvin, Jesse) as warm and responsive, noting the grounds are cleaner, gates now work, and amenities like a theater room and smart home tech feel genuinely valuable. Older complaints paint a darker picture: roaches, broken pool and gym equipment, work orders ignored for years, rude staff, and security issues including theft and break-ins. The shift feels real, but lingering maintenance backlogs and a history of neglect mean tenants considering a move here should verify conditions in person and clarify response times in writing. The pet-friendly side (bark park on site) draws positive mention, though no detailed pet policy review text appears. Prices are described as "incredible" by one recent renter, but the 20-review spread is steep-65 percent five-star against 30 percent one/two-star-suggesting either genuine recent improvement or the reality that affordability masks unresolved problems for those not yet affected.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Burnett Lofts

#224

60

Burnett Lofts

3.6(117)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Burnett Lofts holds a 3.6 rating across 117 Google reviews. A detailed sentiment read was not produced on this pass, so the placement rests on rating consistency and volume.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Ridge Crest Apartments

#225

50 low data

Ridge Crest Apartments

3.8(27)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Wendy, the long-tenured property manager, draws consistent praise for quick responses and care. A small, quiet community with reasonable rents and well-kept grounds appeals to residents seeking a low-key environment. Management quality has fluctuated over years; thin walls, aging fixtures, and occasional parking disputes frustrate some, while others report deposit delays and unexplained fees.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Patriot Pointe Apartments

#226

57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Western Hills Apartments

#227

56 low data

Western Hills Apartments

4.1(56)✓ Google-verified

Many residents find this complex peaceful with well-kept grounds and responsive maintenance. Recent concerns include rude phone interactions, lease paperwork mix-ups, and one tenant's allegation of discriminatory treatment.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Gardens At Cobb Park

#228

55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Fort West Apartments

#229

46

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments struggles with fundamental maintenance and management failures that create unsafe living conditions. Tenants report raw sewage backups lasting months, unchecked roach infestations, mold, and flooded units with no follow-up. The property management is consistently unreachable; complaints go unanswered and maintenance requests stall indefinitely. A controversial towing policy charges $350 per vehicle despite unclear registration procedures, and the office is often vacant. A handful of long-term residents praise quiet periods and responsive staff, but they appear to be exceptions in a complex marked by code violations, inadequate staffing, and systemic neglect.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Leuda May Apartments

#230

54

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Furnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Premier Gardens Apartments

#231

53 low data

Premier Gardens Apartments

3.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise affordable rents for the Cultural District location and recent maintenance improvements, but communication remains a sore spot and some units suffer from heat inefficiency and water infiltration during heavy rain. The property offers spacious townhome-style flats with patios, though older finishes and infrastructure limits appeal.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

#232

49

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

2.6(72)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants describe a complex in serious disrepair where basic requests go unaddressed for months, management ignores legal notices, and residents resort to court action to force compliance. Staff turnover is constant, billing is unreliable, and pests (roaches, beetles) persist despite cleaned units. A handful reported helpful staff, but systemic issues dominate the experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Birchman Commons Apartments

#233

50 low data

Birchman Commons Apartments

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Birchman Commons shows sharp division: older residents praise quiet surroundings and cleanliness, but recent reviews (past 2 years) reveal management collapse, with no leasing office, unresponsive phones, broken laundry for months, and no maintenance response system. The complex appears understaffed and declining.

Pet-Friendly Apartments

Alton Park Apartments

#234

50

Alton Park Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verified

Alton Park has a stark divide: some residents praise office staff and the grounds, but the majority report a frustrating move-in process with shifting timelines, staff rudeness, and maintenance failures. Amenities like the pool and gym operate office hours only, leaving working families unable to use them. Unresolved maintenance issues (AC, electrical hazards, faulty gate) and poor communication compound the problems.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

#235

40 low data

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

3.7(3)

Limited review data shows sharp contrast: one renter praised the peaceful, modern feel and value, but another reported months-long mold issues, roof leaks, and slow repairs despite management change. Health impact noted.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Foundry

#236

50

The Foundry

2.9(95)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents report serious habitability problems: roaches and mice are persistent, maintenance fixes are temporary, and laundry equipment stays broken for months. The office staff (Mary and Kristi notably) are consistently praised for friendliness and responsiveness, but they cannot overcome systemic property neglect. New visitors on tours see a clean presentation, yet actual residents struggle with pest control that barely functions, poor grounds maintenance, and emergency services gaps that have caused property damage and health concerns. Reviewers also note the surrounding neighborhood feels unsafe with frequent police activity and car break-ins. The pool opens and closes off-schedule despite posted times. One two-year resident called it a poor value for the rent; another long-term tenant said conditions worsen yearly despite slow rent increases.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Travis Gardens Apartments

#237

47 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

#238

42 low data

The Berkeley

3.4(5)

The Berkeley shows a stark divide in visitor experiences, with staff responsiveness praised in one account but a recent tour marred by cold reception, dirty common areas, and lack of effort. Cleaning happens only twice yearly, and recent management changes have tightened guest and pool access without resident input.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Granada Gables Apartments

#239

43 low data

Granada Gables Apartments

5.0(3)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the close-knit community and convenient access to downtown Fort Worth, the Arts District, and local attractions. Long-term tenants credit staff like Josh and Victoria for making it a welcoming place to live despite older building soundproofing.

Pet-Friendly Apartments

Autumn Chase Apartments

#240

35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.2(56)

A mixed record: some tenants report attentive staff and timely fixes; many describe months-long repair delays, persistent roach problems, and sewage backups. Visitor parking fees ($3.25-$3.30 daily, $315 tow penalty) and frequent management changes underscore operational instability. Crime and noise complaints recur throughout. Newer reviews (past 2 years) are sparse and positive; the weight of detailed complaints is older but substantial.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Fairway Apartments

#241

37 low data

Fairway Apartments

2.7(16)✓ Google-verified

Fairway's rating of 2.7 out of 5 reflects deep frustration with maintenance neglect and building condition. Long-term residents report repeated flooding, plumbing failures, pest control gaps, and safety concerns that go unresolved despite rent increases. While staff like manager Sandy earn individual praise for effort, the complex lacks consistent on-site presence and accessible support channels. Security is a recurring issue, with homeless activity on the property continuing despite efforts to deter it. The affordable pricing and pet-friendly welcome do not outweigh the documented quality-of-life problems.

Pet-Friendly Apartments

University Villas Apartments

#242

36 low data

University Villas Apartments

2.6(9)✓ Google-verified

Recent reviews paint a stark picture of structural decay and mismanagement. Residents report cockroaches, black mold, broken heating and cooling, and a landlord resistant to timely repairs or tenant concerns. Older positive reviews praised affordability and grounds, but current complaints dominate overwhelmingly.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Lakes of Williamsberg

#243

31 low data

Lakes of Williamsberg

3.4(5)✓ Google-verified

Reviews from nearly a decade ago describe litter left across the grounds with inconsistent staff cleanup. Safety history and housing assistance policies were concerns to past residents.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

The Merritt

#244

35 low data

The Merritt

1.0(1)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

This business has only one Google review on file, and it rates 1 star. Insufficient feedback to assess the property or experience reliably.

Pet-Friendly Apartments

Park Terrace Apartment

#245

32 low data

Park Terrace Apartment

2.7(13)

Park Terrace shows significant dissatisfaction: 54% of reviews are one or two stars, with tenants citing poor communication, outdated apartments, and trash on grounds. Maintenance staff Steve is praised for responsiveness, but management and front-desk interactions are frequently described as disrespectful or dismissive.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Last updated 2026-08-23