Pet-Friendly Apartments in Greater Fort Worth

Page 4 of 4: businesses ranked 301-379 of 379. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

The Brittany Apartments

#301

55

The Brittany Apartments

3.4(299)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

A complex split by management transitions: older residents describe repeated plumbing failures, water bills exceeding $300, repairs taking weeks, and an AI phone system that blocks direct contact. Recent office staff (Nana, DeLa, Asia) have won back some trust through in-person helpfulness, but underlying infrastructure and maintenance culture remain broken. Multiple tenants report non-completed work orders marked as done, broken mailboxes, and pest issues unresolved despite paying for service.

Senior & 55+ LivingStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing

Villas at 1404 Apartments

#302

63

Villas at 1404 Apartments

3.8(163)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tenants report starkly different experiences. Half praise the leasing staff, especially Jewel and Nana, for making the sign-up smooth and responsive maintenance requests. The other half describe a gap between advertised amenities (in-unit washer/dryer, central AC, private patios) and what arrives, along with mounting hidden charges for internet, pest control, and parking. Most damaging are recurring complaints about overgrown grounds, rat and snake sightings, and untreated roach problems that persist despite pest control visits. The 3.8-star rating masks this split: 65% five-star reviews celebrate staff warmth, while 28% one-star reviews cite habitability failures. Recent reviews show ongoing AC breakdowns and grounds issues. One positive: when maintenance staff like Anthony engage fully, repairs happen quickly, but lack of support suggests staffing gaps. Affordability draws renters, but many report the advertised price masks extra charges accumulating monthly.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

#303

58 low data

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

3.8(44)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Palm Tree for its quiet atmosphere and cleanliness. Staff are consistently described as friendly, and management keeps up maintenance despite the property's age. Monthly pest control and modern amenities round out the experience, though some have noted the buildings are older.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Wood Hollow

#304

63

Wood Hollow

3.7(454)✓ Google-verified

The leasing and office staff earn consistent praise for making move-in smooth and responsive help. Reviewers with working units note clean apartments and newer appliances. Yet multiple residents report going weeks or months without hot water, pervasive roaches despite pest control requests, and sporadic maintenance completions. Some appreciate quick fixes; others describe unlivable conditions and repeated utilities outages that stretch across years. Families and pet owners find the grounds appeal in theory, but water and pest crises overshadow these strengths. One reviewer stayed two years through the cycle; another fled after six days without air conditioning in summer heat. The business appears divided: a smooth on-ramp experience collides with deteriorating or unresolved unit-level problems that test long-term residents' patience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Liv+ Arlington

#305

63

Liv+ Arlington

3.8(636)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Liv+ works well for short-term UTA students willing to overlook maintenance. Furnished units, in-unit washer dryer, and same-day maintenance requests draw praise. Cassandra and her team stand out for genuine care. But pest problems plague the property despite weekly treatment, move-out fees feel inflated, hallways stay dirty, and management rarely follows through on complaints or disputes. The real issue: showroom tours hide the condition of occupied areas. Roaches greet new arrivals, elevators break for weeks, and security feels slack. Utility billing through Conservice runs high. For non-UTA residents or anyone seeking a clean, quiet community, this place falls short of its luxury label.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

#306

62

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

3.7(575)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents report improved management and swift repairs, while newer arrivals praise the floor plans and leasing staff (especially Bianca, Maricela, Alejandra). However, significant infrastructure problems recur: roach infestations and water system failures persist despite maintenance requests, parking is chronically crowded, and office staff are hard to reach by phone. Billing surprises and access gate malfunctions compound frustration, though maintenance crew Dee and others are noted as courteous when they do respond. Several residents report encountering snakes and severe pest issues that required escalation to the manager. The property has undergone recent management changes; newer reviews credit this transition, but older complaints suggest systemic maintenance and communication gaps remain. Charges for services and deposits have been contested as unclear or non-refundable when residents expected transparency.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

#307

58

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(115)✓ Google-verified

Management changes in February 2026 marked a turning point. Tenants now report timely repairs, responsive staff, and visible property improvements including pool reopening and landscape work. Meshun Davis is named repeatedly for patience and reliability. However, older complaints about pest control, mold, lawn maintenance, and the leasing office's responsiveness persist in earlier reviews. Newer five-star reviews suggest these issues may be improving under current management, but pest problems and communication gaps were serious obstacles for some residents.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing

Athena Apartment Homes

#308

58

Athena Apartment Homes

3.4(272)

New management has brought visible improvement and staff like Megan now communicate clearly and work to resolve issues. However, years of deferred maintenance left deep problems: roaches, water failures, uncut grass, and pool neglect persist despite monthly pest and maintenance fees. Tenants praise the newer leadership's responsiveness but warn that trust is still being rebuilt after long periods of ignored requests and incomplete repairs. The complex sits in a desirable Benbrook location at lower prices, which draws people seeking a fresh start. Yet the gap between what management promises and what grounds crews deliver remains stark. Recent reviews suggest momentum toward better conditions, but long-standing infrastructure problems and inconsistent follow-through mean prospective residents should verify current maintenance standards before committing.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Jefferson Ederville

#309

58

Jefferson Ederville

3.8(25)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tours consistently impress, with staff like Faith Garcia, Darius, and Valerie earning repeated praise for attentiveness and professionalism. The property itself draws visitors with new construction, resort-style amenities, and attainable housing options. Behind that facade, however, application processing becomes a nightmare. Multiple applicants report two-month waits with radio silence, forgotten paperwork, unanswered phones, and denials arriving just before their move-in date. Staff inconsistency is stark: some leasing agents excel while others disappear, and management (particularly noted in several accounts) appears overwhelmed and unaccountable. The experience hinges entirely on which staff member handles your file. Residents currently living here praise maintenance and management, but the application gauntlet deters serious applicants. Several reviewers specifically warned others not to apply, citing wasted application fees and impossible timelines. If you value the property itself, budget extra time and patience for the backend process, and be prepared to call repeatedly for status updates.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Mateo Apartment Homes

#310

63

Mateo Apartment Homes

3.7(338)✓ Google-verified

New management has earned strong praise for efficiency during move-ins and attentiveness from office staff like Kristine, Dahlia, and Vanessa. Residents who have experienced the recent turnaround report visible property improvements and swift maintenance responses. However, significant infrastructure issues undermine this progress: persistent roach problems, months-long pool closures despite paid amenities, overflowing dumpsters, and unrepaired maintenance items (like a broken-into unit left open for weeks) create frustration. Many also report difficulty reaching management by phone or email, and disputes over fees and rent increases. The complex serves long-term residents alongside recent arrivals, creating a divided experience.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Sunset Heights Apartments

#311

57

Sunset Heights Apartments

3.5(52)✓ Google-verified

Sunset Heights Apartments draws strong praise for certain staff members and its quiet, convenient location near downtown Fort Worth, but long-standing pest issues, inconsistent maintenance response, and repeated management changes undermine the experience. Tenants report the complex has potential but upkeep and pest control require urgent improvement.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Union at River East

#312

62

The Union at River East

3.7(234)✓ Google-verified

Staff members Orlando and Ryan earn consistent five-star praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, while the maintenance team responds quickly when called. The complex offers appealing amenities: infinity-edge pool, co-working space, outdoor seating, and flexible floor plans on a prime Race Street location. Yet rent at $1,800+ monthly brings high expectations the property has struggled to meet. Residents report a broken garage gate left unfixed for months, creating security gaps and theft. Management has been slow or dismissive on disability accommodations, key fob access failures, and billing errors. Move-in readiness and building access control remain friction points despite recent signs of operational improvement.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Trinity Trace

#313

58

Trinity Trace

2.8(123)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and recent arrivals praise the quiet grounds, approachable maintenance staff (including Joe, Pam, Jenny, and Vianca), and spacious layouts. The complex welcomes second-chance applicants. However, scattered reports of roaches and mold, outdated AC systems, and repeated complaints about steep renewal rates and undisclosed move-out charges undercut the positives.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Timberline Condominiums

#314

49

Timberline Condominiums

2.7(30)✓ Google-verified

When staff are engaged, residents report quick fixes and professional service; past managers Stephanie, Christina, and Jonathan earned strong praise for communication and problem-solving. However, current management is largely absent, maintenance waits 6-8 weeks or goes unfinished, and residents battle persistent roaches, mold, leaky windows, rotted fencing, and broken appliances that stay broken. The Tipton Group corporate office does not respond to escalations.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Westmount at River Park Apartments

#315

53

Westmount at River Park Apartments

3.4(218)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Westmount at River Park is split sharply between strong praise for leasing staff and deep frustration with management, maintenance, and condition. Long-term residents cite repeated turnover in management, inconsistent policies, unresponsive offices, hidden fees that weren't refunded, and deteriorating units. The pool has stayed closed for months despite being a resident priority, the workout room smells bad, and in-unit amenities like washers and hot water fail or were never installed as promised. Staff at the leasing desk earn consistent five-star reviews for helpfulness. Those staying report feeling safe but exhausted by the complex's rigid policies and slow repairs. The business advertises one- and two-bedroom options with pet services, a fitness center, and coffee bar. Their website lists special move-in offers. In practice, reviewers say move-in deals go unpaid, parking is heavily restricted, and maintenance requests languish. One tenant with strong payment history faced eviction proceedings after requesting a single payment delay. Newer residents sometimes report good initial experiences; longer-term occupants describe escalating frustration with unresponsive management and inability to reach named staff like Brittany.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments

#316

49 low data

West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments

4.3(7)✓ Google-verified

Tenants praise updated interiors and solid upkeep despite the building's age. Limited recent feedback makes trends hard to assess.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments

Boulders (Hurst)

#317

61

Boulders (Hurst)

3.6(145)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents consistently praise the quiet, dog-friendly community and the maintenance team's responsiveness when repairs are straightforward. However, recurring complaints about pest control (gnats and roaches), variable repair timelines for parts-dependent work, and a few reports of dismissive leasing office behavior create friction that tempers satisfaction. The experience varies sharply depending on neighbor conduct and personal pest history. Leasing staff, especially Melissa and Sandra, earn strong marks for friendliness during move-in in most reviews, yet a minority report passive aggression during key interactions. Mike, the maintenance technician, is named specifically for going beyond his job. The grounds and units are described as well-kept and spacious, and the gated layout with amenities appeals to families and long-term residents seeking stability.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

The Griffin Apartments

#318

61

The Griffin Apartments

3.8(216)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers describe severe gaps between marketing and reality. Strong maintenance staff like Angel and Christina earn genuine praise, but their efforts are undermined by systemic failures: tenants waited months for AC fixes, confronted roaches and mold on move-in, and faced a leasing office that ignores calls and closes orders without completing work. Multiple applicants reported deposit theft using a claimed Texas law loophole. The property's reputation hinges on individual employees carrying an overloaded system. A 2-year resident and a newcomer both cite identical AC problems spanning years with dozens of closed work orders showing no completion. Move-in delays and unavailable staff are routine. Complaints range from infestations and drafty windows to locked self-tour boxes and an AI phone system that routes to voicemail. The few positive reviews name staff directly, suggesting gratitude is directed at people fighting against the complex's processes.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

McCart Apartments

#319

61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing

Historic Electric Building Apartments

#320

62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Maxwell Apartments

#321

61

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(348)✓ Google-verified

Strong front-office staff, particularly leasing agents Alice and Veronica, earn high marks for attentiveness and professionalism during move-in. However, billing practices and collections threats weigh heavily. A handful of long-tenured residents praise Ruben and the maintenance team's responsiveness, yet emergency requests go unanswered for hours in heat emergencies, and some work leaves property damaged. AI chatbot errors result in lost deposits, and office staff attitudes vary sharply by person. Sliding-scale rent attracts renters, but ancillary fees (pest control, app, holding) frequently trigger disputes. The 58% five-star rate reflects satisfied movers and loyal residents; the 32% one/two-star cluster points to billing drama and unresolved maintenance emergencies that sour longer stays.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Ticknor Terrace

#322

48 low data

Ticknor Terrace

2.8(39)✓ Google-verified

Ticknor Terrace has deteriorated significantly. Recent reviews describe a roach and rat-infested property with aggressive move-out charging, rude staff, and poor ground maintenance. Older reviews mention helpful staff and quiet neighbors, but current conditions and management practices dominate complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingStudent Housing

Townhouse West

#323

61

Townhouse West

4.2(24)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the peaceful setting, spacious units, and standout staff members like receptionist Karla and maintenance tech Bryant McCoy. However, earlier management changes created turmoil: some tenants faced mold, flooding, poor repairs, and perceived harassment before eviction, while others now report good service under current leadership.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

The Kimberly Apartments

#324

61

The Kimberly Apartments

3.7(239)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Kimberly draws people seeking budget-friendly rent and benefits from staff like Karina and Undrea who handle leasing and repairs with speed and professionalism. However, persistent complaints about pest infestations, stalled maintenance requests, deceptive unit photos, and unresolved amenities (valet trash) undermine the experience for many residents. Recent management change to CAF has improved some service aspects, though the gaps between advertised features and actual maintenance remain a major frustration. Air conditioning failures and unresponsive communication during emergencies have emerged as particularly severe issues.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Chaparral Ranch Homes

#325

56

Chaparral Ranch Homes

3.5(64)✓ Google-verified

Staff inconsistency defines the experience here. A handful of leasing team members (Shannon, Gwen, Adrianne) earn high marks for patience and warmth, and some residents report zero maintenance issues over a full year. But the majority report a frustrating application process marked by conflicting answers, ignored emails, and unanswered phones. Once inside, common complaints include a persistent ant problem pest control has failed to resolve, slow maintenance response unless residents push back, and a leasing office that dismisses current tenants. The property itself looks good-residents call homes gorgeous and amenities resort-like-yet management chaos undercuts the appeal. A steep divide runs through recent reviews: those who encountered the right staff person feel genuinely welcomed; those who didn't describe being pressured, ignored, or turned away during critical moments. Income limit surprises arrive too late in the process. New management starting in October appeared to tighten policies and worsen tenant relations. The complex seems caught between a good physical product and staff training that has not kept pace with resident needs.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

West 7th Apartments

#326

48 low data

West 7th Apartments

3.6(30)

Staff like Zoraya, Chris, Latoya, and Astra Management earn praise for friendliness and effort, and the courtyard and gardens appeal to those seeking calm. Serious flaws undercut the setting: repeated AC breakdowns, weeks-long repair waits even in summer heat, mold in flooded units, and trash buildup from weekly cleaning cycles make this risky for anyone with low tolerance for maintenance gaps or heat sensitivity.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing

The Celine

#327

59

The Celine

2.8(226)✓ Google-verified

Staff names like Cristal, Lauren, and Crystal earn consistent praise for patience during leasing and problem-solving, and maintenance does respond promptly when it shows up. The contradiction is sharp: recent reviews celebrate improvements under new management, but older residents report years of ignored maintenance tickets, pest infestations, AC failures in summer heat, move-in units that were dirty and broken, and aggressive security deposit deductions that survivors claim as systematic. Advertised rent ($945 for two bedroom) balloons with mandatory valet trash and fees to $1,136 monthly. The property is spacious and the location works for access to shops and restaurants. However, families with young children in hot bedrooms, tenants without backup cooling, and those counting on their security deposit need to know the historical pattern of unaddressed complaints and financial disputes before signing.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Foundry

#328

52

The Foundry

2.9(96)✓ Google-verified

The Foundry divides sharply: half its reviews are five-star testimonials praising Mary and office staff as exceptionally responsive and professional, while the other half report endemic pest problems, non-functional appliances, and deteriorating grounds that persist despite rent paid. Residents consistently mention roaches, broken laundry equipment, and minimal maintenance follow-up; one two-year tenant called repairs "temporary patches" rather than fixes. The friendly leasing team and dog park are genuine bright spots, but structural issues (flooded units, broken gates, temperature control) and a neighborhood marked by gunshots undercut any appeal to anyone seeking stability or safety. Newer five-star reviews (within the past five months) conflict sharply with older one-star accounts dating back a year, suggesting either recent turnover in management effectiveness or conflicting experiences by resident type. One long-term tenant credited Mary specifically for prompt work-order handling but acknowledged roach complaints as valid for others, noting personal pest control required.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing

Reserve at Quebec

#329

59

Reserve at Quebec

3.0(209)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviews highlight a maintenance team that shows up fast and treats residents well, especially Tony and Luis who earn repeated praise. Residents who stay long-term describe a quiet, family-friendly place with attentive staff. However, a parallel stream of one-star complaints focuses on months-long repair delays, failed emergency calls (sewage backups left unresolved), unresponsive management after promises are made, and a recent billing scare where a resident faced collection action after her lease ended. The split is stark: those praising the community and maintenance crew versus those trapped in repair limbo with indifferent office staff. Property remains affordable and pet-friendly, but the gap between maintenance responsiveness and office follow-through creates a lottery feel. Families and seniors considering this location should ask specifically about AC and emergency repair timelines before signing.

Senior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Tides on Avril

#330

54

Tides on Avril

3.5(248)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents describe a complex with serious ongoing problems: pest infestations reviewers say management ignores, a non-functional security gate, broken amenities (pool rarely open, laundry overpriced), mold and water damage that go unfixed for months, and rising rent charges residents cannot explain. A handful praise office staff like Taliza and Bibiana and note fast electrician response, but these bright spots do not outweigh systemic neglect. Management communication is a recurring friction point. Residents report unanswered emails, broken promises to fix deposits returned months late, and staff going silent after repair requests. New tenants say they were barred from viewing units before signing leases, then found roaches, mold, and sewage backups in move-in condition. The complex charges service and facilities fees but does not deliver the amenities advertised.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

The Madeleine

#331

51

The Madeleine

3.1(98)✓ Google-verified

Half the reviews praise staff responsiveness and community feel; the other half document systemic neglect. Maintenance workers like Dwayne and James earn consistent recognition for speed and care, but management itself struggles with communication, accountability, and basic property upkeep. Reviewers report widespread trash, pest control delays lasting weeks, parking zones half a mile from units, water outages, mold concerns around HVAC systems, and a pattern of office unavailability. Several long-term residents describe steady decline and hint at unequal treatment across sections of the complex. Newer tenants with positive experiences tend to occupy better-maintained areas or need minimal service. Those with persistent issues-particularly health and safety concerns like moisture in vents and pest infestations-report management dismissiveness and feel forced to involve code compliance. The leasing office staff receive mixed marks: some (Tashyra, Cindy in early reviews, Cynthia) earned praise for courtesy and patience, while others faced criticism for rudeness or evasiveness.

Furnished & Corporate HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Tides on Hulen

#332

55

Tides on Hulen

3.1(197)✓ Google-verified

The community draws mixed reactions that fall sharply along lines of in-person and administrative experience. Leasing staff Lorraine and Felicia earn consistent praise for attentiveness and kindness; several residents also note spacious layouts and proximity to shopping, work, and schools. However, a substantial group reports systematic failures: chronic hot water outages lasting weeks or months, unresponsive phone lines, toilets and closet doors left broken, and security deposits held or lost after move-out. Management's handling of tenant complaints has been characterized as evasive or aggressive, and accounting errors involving final billing have emerged. One resident of three years stayed only for location; another abandoned a claim after months of unanswered calls.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Sorrento

#333

59

Sorrento

3.4(431)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, especially Kaitlynn, earn consistent five-star praise for friendliness and smooth tours. Several residents highlight Abraham in maintenance and office team members Gia, Beth, and Yordi as genuinely helpful. However, a vocal stripe of one-star reviews document serious problems: maintenance delays or faulty repairs, move-out charges reaching $5,000 with unanswered disputes, kitchen sink flooding, no hot water, AC failures, and an AI-only phone system. Management changed hands within the past year, and residents report the turnover has worsened service. The gap between exceptional leasing impressions and operational failures suggests a strong front end masking deeper property issues. The disparity is stark: five reviewers name Kaitlynn alone for transforming their apartment search. Yet residents also describe no recourse for infrastructure problems, voicemails gone unanswered for weeks, and charges appearing after move-in that were never discussed. One long-term resident documented pre-existing damage, requested maintenance, then faced $5,000 in disputed charges after move-out despite providing photos and emails. Another tenant reports the kitchen sink constantly backs up with dirty water they must manually shovel out. These accounts span maintenance, billing, and customer service-all operational, not leasing-side.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Encore on Mustang Apartments

#334

59

The Encore on Mustang Apartments

3.6(153)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviewers consistently praise office staff like Silvia and Norma for friendliness and speed, and describe the community as quiet and well-kept. One-star reviews cite persistent maintenance failures (no hot water, broken appliances), pest infestations, discriminatory treatment, unreasonable fees, and unresponsive management that does not assist residents with safety issues. The rating split is stark: 61% give five stars, 34% give one or two. Recent negative reviews describe roaches, poor communication, unexpected move-out charges, and $17 visitor parking. Positive feedback centers on the leasing team's professionalism and the grounds condition. The divide suggests dramatically different resident experiences depending on unit condition and when problems are reported.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

#335

47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Marine Park Apartments

#336

58 low data

Marine Park Apartments

3.7(76)✓ Google-verified

Most five-star reviews highlight staff like Shaquera, Uchenna, Kaira, and Denasia for going above and beyond during leasing. A minority of one-star reviews cite thin walls that transmit neighbor noise and sound-checking during initial phone inquiries.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Estrella at Seminary Apartments

#337

59

Estrella at Seminary Apartments

3.7(94)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and recent arrivals consistently praise Patricia, Ana, and named maintenance staff like Pedro for patience and responsiveness during move-in and repairs. The complex serves relocated families and offers bilingual support. However, a deep rift emerges: roughly one-third of reviewers report chronic maintenance failures, pest infestations that persist despite paid fumigation, water damage left unaddressed for months, and management that ignores repair requests or marks work orders complete without visiting units. Rent burden versus habitability issues compounds frustration. The business itself varies by tenant experience. Some feel heard and supported; others describe dismissive office behavior, locked-door management, and deteriorating conditions (mold, roaches, incomplete repairs). A few long-term residents credit recent management changes with improvement, while simultaneous reviews from mid-2024 document ongoing pest and repair problems. Staff turnover or inconsistency appears to affect outcomes.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Siddons Place Apartments

#338

58

Siddons Place Apartments

3.9(27)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents appreciate the staff and open layouts, but recurring complaints about a persistently closed pool, roach infestations, and utility costs from third-party providers dampened otherwise solid experiences. Some former tenants report difficulty recovering security deposits after move-out.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Infinity on the Landing

#339

57

Infinity on the Landing

3.5(86)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Reviewers split sharply: those praising individual staff members like Erika, Irving, and Angel describe rapid maintenance response and friendly service. Others report persistent roaches, a nonfunctional gate, pool hours too restrictive to use, and management that adds charges or enforces rules residents say were not disclosed upfront. Safety concerns including a dryer fire and sewage backup drew complaints that management prioritized recovery fees over resident welfare. The complex has long-term residents, but recent experiences suggest significant management and maintenance inconsistency. Strong individual staff members stand out against systemic problems: towing disputes, washer-dryer chargebacks, and pest control that does not fully resolve infestations. Residents mention feeling nickeled and dimed, with management allegedly reinterpreting lease terms months in and withholding supervisor contact. The gated community's security gate reportedly remains propped open, undermining the advertised security feature.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Monterrey Apartments

#340

58

Monterrey Apartments

3.5(100)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Monterrey delivers a split experience. When maintenance shows up, staff like Harry and Eric are fast, polite, and thorough; rent remains low. However, core systems fail: AC and heat outages last weeks, gas leaks stretch three weeks, roaches and rodents persist for months despite complaints, and move-in units are dirty and paint-chipped. Management goes silent until tenants threaten to leave. Utility bills climb inexplicably (water up 60%, gas up 263% in one case), leasing agents are sometimes rude, and the property photos bear little resemblance to units inside.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Park City Townhomes Apartments

#341

58

Park City Townhomes Apartments

3.4(156)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Park City's resident base splits sharply: most residents praise Lisa and the management team for their warmth, quick maintenance responses, and family-friendly atmosphere. However, a consistent thread of one-star reviews flags persistent pest infestations, communication breakdowns, and cosmetic repairs that mask underlying maintenance issues, creating real doubt about consistency across units.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Morningside Apartments

#342

58

Morningside Apartments

3.6(65)✓ Google-verified

Management and leasing staff, especially Maria and Juan, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and problem-solving. Recent administrative changes have notably improved resident satisfaction and maintenance responsiveness. However, recurring complaints center on aging infrastructure: pest problems, mold, leaks, and slow fixes on critical systems like heating. Some residents report year-long repair waits. The gap between enthusiastic recent reviews and older complaints suggests either real improvements underway or inconsistent execution across different maintenance issues and timeframes.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing

Spring Glen Apartments

#343

45 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen draws long-term residents who value the peaceful setting and responsive management, though the pool's chronic closure frustrates prospects counting on that amenity. Evidence is limited to brief reviews spanning several years, with mixed satisfaction tilting toward stability for those already settled in.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Ridge Crest Apartments

#344

50 low data

Ridge Crest Apartments

3.8(27)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Wendy, the long-tenured property manager, draws consistent praise for quick responses and care. A small, quiet community with reasonable rents and well-kept grounds appeals to residents seeking a low-key environment. Management quality has fluctuated over years; thin walls, aging fixtures, and occasional parking disputes frustrate some, while others report deposit delays and unexplained fees.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Woodbridge Townhomes

#345

57

Woodbridge Townhomes

3.4(106)✓ Google-verified

Strong opinions divide along recent experience lines. Tenants who arrived after late 2023 praise Eric and the management team for attentiveness, quick repairs, and renovations that transformed the community. Longer-term residents report a stark shift from neglect to responsiveness, though a subset face ongoing appliance delays and unresolved water/utility disputes. Leasing tours generate enthusiasm: staff are knowledgeable and personable. The grounds and townhomes photograph well. Yet some residents cite recurring problems: limited parking (two spots only), billing errors, slow washer repairs, and historical pest and mold complaints that predate the current team.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Western Hills Apartments

#346

56 low data

Western Hills Apartments

4.1(56)✓ Google-verified

Many residents find this complex peaceful with well-kept grounds and responsive maintenance. Recent concerns include rude phone interactions, lease paperwork mix-ups, and one tenant's allegation of discriminatory treatment.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Garden Gate Apartments

#347

52

Garden Gate Apartments

3.2(110)✓ Google-verified

Some residents report attentive staff and stable living situations, but the majority describe chronic repair neglect, mold that was sprayed but never fixed, foundation cracks left untreated, and water damage that lingered for years. Management disputes over pet deposits, sudden violation notices (including one for dirty dishes), and a towing company charging guests $20-22 per visit after two days have created distrust. Safety issues include break-in attempts, homeless individuals accessing the property, and thin walls allowing neighbors' disturbances to affect daily life.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

The Dean Apartments

#348

56

The Dean Apartments

3.0(100)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff like Jennifer, Gina, and Georgina deliver warm, attentive service during tours and lease signings, and some residents praise the pool and convenient location near campus. However, deep maintenance failures undermine the experience: roaches appear in multiple units and appliances, air conditioning breaks repeatedly with days-long waits for repairs, laundry machines malfunction constantly, and sidewalks stay visibly dirty. Management turnover and office phone/hours issues compound frustration, especially for international students facing high rent for the problems they encounter. The divide is stark. Recent positive reviews highlight Jennifer's responsiveness to current tenants; earlier one-star accounts describe a property that feels abandoned by upkeep and leadership. Whether you experience the friendly staff side or the maintenance crisis side appears to depend heavily on timing and luck with your unit.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Gardens At Cobb Park

#349

55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Creekside Apartment Homes

#350

56 low data

Creekside Apartment Homes

4.2(5)✓ Google-verified

Most reviewers praise staff for answering questions and good customer service. One resident reports difficulty reaching the office by phone, suggesting inconsistent communication availability.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

The District on Collins

#351

55

The District on Collins

2.9(241)✓ Google-verified

Front desk staff, particularly Carolina, earn consistent praise for friendliness and communication. However, this is overwhelmed by widespread complaints about pest infestations residents handle themselves, maintenance that marks work complete without visiting, and billing surprises. Multiple families with children report rats and roaches throughout units despite paying pest control fees; some waited months for basic repairs like air conditioning. The contrast between leasing experience and actual living conditions is stark.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Villa Monterrey apartments

#352

55

Villa Monterrey apartments

3.2(69)✓ Google-verified

Villa Monterrey draws strong praise from long-term residents who value the quiet setting, spacious layouts, and recent improvements under new maintenance leadership. However, reviews reveal serious problems: a history of pest infestations, high turnover in property management tied to resident disputes, allegations of improper lockouts during move-outs, and move-in conditions that fail inspection standards. The 3.2-star rating reflects this split: 45% five-star satisfaction clashing with 39% one/two-star complaints about habitability and management conduct.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Amberwood Apartments

#353

55 low data

Amberwood Apartments

3.3(113)

Heavy maintenance failures dominate resident experience. Units leak, mold grows unchecked, and cockroaches persist through fumigation; families report children hospitalized from mold exposure. On-site staff get praise, but corporate management ignores repair requests and tenant complaints, making this a risky choice despite low prices.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Leuda May Apartments

#354

53

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Fort West Apartments

#355

46

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments struggles with fundamental maintenance and management failures that create unsafe living conditions. Tenants report raw sewage backups lasting months, unchecked roach infestations, mold, and flooded units with no follow-up. The property management is consistently unreachable; complaints go unanswered and maintenance requests stall indefinitely. A controversial towing policy charges $350 per vehicle despite unclear registration procedures, and the office is often vacant. A handful of long-term residents praise quiet periods and responsive staff, but they appear to be exceptions in a complex marked by code violations, inadequate staffing, and systemic neglect.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Premier Gardens Apartments

#356

52 low data

Premier Gardens Apartments

3.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise affordable rents for the Cultural District location and recent maintenance improvements, but communication remains a sore spot and some units suffer from heat inefficiency and water infiltration during heavy rain. The property offers spacious townhome-style flats with patios, though older finishes and infrastructure limits appeal.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Trails at Wedgewood Apartments

#357

49

The Trails at Wedgewood Apartments

3.4(26)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

De recently resolved an A/C emergency with genuine care, but most reviews describe years of neglected maintenance, unanswered phones, and pest problems residents pay to control yet never see addressed. New management lifted spirits four years ago, but recent complaints suggest those improvements have evaporated, leaving tenants frustrated and dealing with rats, roaches, and broken systems on their own.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

30 West Luxury Rental Homes

#358

53

30 West Luxury Rental Homes

4.3(10)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants praise the leasing process and staff, especially agent Renee Upshaw, who handles paperwork quickly and answers questions thoroughly. However, recent residents report months-long waits for pool keys, unresponsive maintenance requests for broken deadbolts, and disputed fees including late charges of nearly $400 for a trash placement violation enforced inconsistently across the community.

Furnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

#359

40 low data

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

3.7(3)

Limited review data shows sharp contrast: one renter praised the peaceful, modern feel and value, but another reported months-long mold issues, roof leaks, and slow repairs despite management change. Health impact noted.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing

Alton Park Apartments

#360

50

Alton Park Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verified

Alton Park has a stark divide: some residents praise office staff and the grounds, but the majority report a frustrating move-in process with shifting timelines, staff rudeness, and maintenance failures. Amenities like the pool and gym operate office hours only, leaving working families unable to use them. Unresolved maintenance issues (AC, electrical hazards, faulty gate) and poor communication compound the problems.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Mission Pointe Club Apartments

#361

50 low data

Mission Pointe Club Apartments

3.3(115)✓ Google-verified

Mission Pointe Club offers townhome-style and pet-friendly units near DFW Airport, but a steep split in reviews signals serious problems. Roach infestations, surprise water outages, ignored maintenance requests, and aggressive move-out fees dominate complaints, though a handful praise location and pet policies.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing

#362

39 low data

The Union at Stockyards

5.0(1)

One five-star review praises the property, though limited feedback makes a full picture difficult. The business advertises studios, one- and two-bedroom units, plus resort-style pool, pickleball court, and Sky Lounge.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Buttercup Place Apartments

#363

47 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.2(21)✓ Google-verified

Reviews split sharply: half report feeling safe and grateful for affordable housing, half flag pest infestations, safety issues in the park, and trouble reaching management. Staff kindness (Ms. Cheri noted) does not offset maintenance and communication gaps.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Travis Gardens Apartments

#364

47 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

#365

41 low data

The Berkeley

3.4(5)

The Berkeley shows a stark divide in visitor experiences, with staff responsiveness praised in one account but a recent tour marred by cold reception, dirty common areas, and lack of effort. Cleaning happens only twice yearly, and recent management changes have tightened guest and pool access without resident input.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments

Autumn Chase Apartments

#366

35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.2(56)

A mixed record: some tenants report attentive staff and timely fixes; many describe months-long repair delays, persistent roach problems, and sewage backups. Visitor parking fees ($3.25-$3.30 daily, $315 tow penalty) and frequent management changes underscore operational instability. Crime and noise complaints recur throughout. Newer reviews (past 2 years) are sparse and positive; the weight of detailed complaints is older but substantial.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Granada Gables Apartments

#367

43 low data

Granada Gables Apartments

5.0(3)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the close-knit community and convenient access to downtown Fort Worth, the Arts District, and local attractions. Long-term tenants credit staff like Josh and Victoria for making it a welcoming place to live despite older building soundproofing.

Pet-Friendly Apartments

Fairway Apartments

#368

37 low data

Fairway Apartments

2.7(16)✓ Google-verified

Fairway's rating of 2.7 out of 5 reflects deep frustration with maintenance neglect and building condition. Long-term residents report repeated flooding, plumbing failures, pest control gaps, and safety concerns that go unresolved despite rent increases. While staff like manager Sandy earn individual praise for effort, the complex lacks consistent on-site presence and accessible support channels. Security is a recurring issue, with homeless activity on the property continuing despite efforts to deter it. The affordable pricing and pet-friendly welcome do not outweigh the documented quality-of-life problems.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Park Terrace Apartment

#369

33 low data

Park Terrace Apartment

2.9(14)

Current residents report poor communication from management, outdated apartments, and neglected grounds. One maintenance technician (Steve) earns consistent praise, but management conduct and staff professionalism are major pain points. Evidence is limited by age and sparse recent reviews.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Landing Furnished Apartments at The Henderson

#370

33 low data

Landing Furnished Apartments at The Henderson

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Landing offers furnished apartments at The Henderson with a focus on flexibility for corporate and student stays. Their website lists gourmet kitchens, in-unit laundry, a resort-style pool, pet park, coworking space, and 24/7 guest support, though direct review evidence is limited.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingLuxury Apartments

#371

33 low data

Landing Furnished Apartments at Oxford at Lake Worth

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Landing Furnished Apartments at Oxford at Lake Worth advertises fully-furnished units with in-unit washer/dryer, smart TVs, and fast Wi-Fi across Fort Worth and nearby areas. Their website claims 24/7 guest support and pet-friendly options. Review evidence is limited.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

University Villas Apartments

#372

36 low data

University Villas Apartments

2.6(9)✓ Google-verified

Recent reviews paint a stark picture of structural decay and mismanagement. Residents report cockroaches, black mold, broken heating and cooling, and a landlord resistant to timely repairs or tenant concerns. Older positive reviews praised affordability and grounds, but current complaints dominate overwhelmingly.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments

Lakes of Williamsberg

#373

31 low data

Lakes of Williamsberg

3.4(5)✓ Google-verified

Reviews from nearly a decade ago describe litter left across the grounds with inconsistent staff cleanup. Safety history and housing assistance policies were concerns to past residents.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Landing Furnished Apartments at Broadway Chapter

#374

31 low data

Landing Furnished Apartments at Broadway Chapter

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Review evidence for this property is limited. Landing Furnished Apartments at Broadway Chapter in Bricktown serves students and corporate renters with furnished units, in-unit washer/dryer, fast Wi-Fi, and pet-friendly options. Their website lists 24/7 guest support, workspace amenities, and flexible short and long-term leases.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingLuxury Apartments

Landing Furnished Apartments at REVL Crockett Row

#375

31 low data

Landing Furnished Apartments at REVL Crockett Row

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Review evidence is limited for this business. Their website lists furnished apartments, short-term stays, corporate housing, and monthly rentals in Fort Worth's Cultural District, with in-unit washer/dryer and fitness facilities available.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Merritt

#376

35 low data

The Merritt

1.0(1)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

This business has only one Google review on file, and it rates 1 star. Insufficient feedback to assess the property or experience reliably.

Pet-Friendly Apartments

Cortland Ridglea Phase 2

#377

27 low data

Cortland Ridglea Phase 2

No rating yetPublishes prices

Review detail is limited; no individual tenant feedback available. The business claims multiple excellence and reputation awards for 2025-2026 and lists 1-3 bedroom options with pet facilities and in-unit laundry.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

The Harrison Apartments

#378

27 low data

The Harrison Apartments

No rating yet✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Review evidence is limited. The Harrison Apartments operates as a furnished luxury complex at 521 Samuels Ave. offering flexible leases, pet-friendly units, 24-hour maintenance, and river-view verandahs. Their website lists one-bedroom units starting at $1,995 and two-bedroom units from $2,895.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing

#379

21 low data

Axis Waterfront

No rating yet

Axis Waterfront operates as a luxury apartment community in Fort Worth with multiple floor plans and pet-friendly amenities. Review evidence is limited, so prospective residents should verify current conditions and pricing directly with the community.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Last updated 2026-09-23