Townhome-Style Apartment Communities in Greater Fort Worth

Page 2 of 3: businesses ranked 101-200 of 278. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

Loft Vue Living

#101

71

Loft Vue Living

3.9(209)✓ Google-verified

Loft Vue resonates strongly with TCU students who value its proximity to campus and furnished options at competitive rates. Staff like Roderick consistently earn praise for making the leasing process feel unhurried and welcoming, yet maintenance responses can be sluggish (a technician checking HVAC only at 9am without investigating issues) and move-ins sometimes reveal uncleaned units. One tenant flagged unresponsive crisis management during fire alarms and management blackouts.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Henley

#102

71

The Henley

4.2(195)✓ Google-verified

The Henley draws strong praise for amenities and maintenance staff under current leadership, but recent reviews reflect deep frustration over aggressive towing (residents report being towed multiple times despite registration), poor communication during move-out, and declining upkeep. A management shift appears to have divided the experience: long-term residents cite noticeable deterioration, while newer visitors highlight friendly leasing agents and spacious layouts.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Heritage

#103

71

The Heritage

4.3(155)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Emma and Annie earn consistent praise for friendliness and attentive service, with move-ins described as smooth and maintenance handled quickly. However, a substantial minority report serious concerns: loud music and fights between residents, aging apartments with maintenance gaps, no security cameras despite mail theft, and aggressive towing of visitor vehicles without clear warnings. Safe community atmosphere praised by some; chaotic and unsafe by others.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Berkeley Apartments

#104

71

The Berkeley Apartments

4.2(507)✓ Google-verified

Kenza Berthal has single-handedly salvaged move-in experiences for multiple residents through her attentiveness and problem-solving; others credit her patience and friendliness with making the application process smooth. That said, once you live here, maintenance becomes a struggle: residents report waiting months for repairs, mysterious missing packages, unaddressed mold and water damage, and a property manager who does not return calls until move-out day. The 700+ unit community appears stretched thin on staffing. Baron, a leasing agent, has frustrated residents with rushed tours, dismissive attitudes, and incorrect lease information. More broadly, the gap between a strong first impression (thanks to select staff and nice grounds) and post-move-in reality (slow maintenance, communication breakdowns) is the core tension in these reviews.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Terraces of Marine Creek Apartments

#105

71

Terraces of Marine Creek Apartments

3.9(151)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents consistently praise the office staff and maintenance team for responsiveness and care. Huseni and JJ stand out as staff who create a genuinely welcoming environment. The grounds stay clean, common areas function well, and the community feels peaceful and stable. One resident flagged a recent roach infestation across multiple buildings and noted ambiguity around smoking policy enforcement, citing these as deal-breakers despite appreciation for new management's efforts.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Remi Apartment Homes

#106

64

Remi Apartment Homes

3.8(237)✓ Google-verified

Strong first impressions fade over time. New residents praise Danyal and other leasing staff for attentive, patient tours and friendly service. Maintenance workers Jose and Sergio earn direct thanks for responsiveness. Yet established tenants report a sharp decline: gates broken for months without repair, trash overflowing weekly, pool neglected and moldy, roach infestations, and fitness equipment broken and dirty. Office hours exclude working residents, the phone system is unresponsive AI, and emergency maintenance has no real contact line. Management reportedly charges disputed move-out fees ($140 cleaning, $20 per trash item) and lacks basic tenant communication or follow-up on problems. The contrast between leasing experience and daily living is stark. Newer residents cite quiet surroundings and amenities; longer tenants report conditions deteriorating. Major complaints center on neglected infrastructure (gates, trash, pool), pest control failures, and a management stance that feels dismissive of tenant concerns and Texas tenant rights.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Southpoint Villas

#107

70

Southpoint Villas

4.1(279)✓ Google-verified

A well-run property with polished leasing and grounds, but maintenance responsiveness lags. Staff like Chris, Alejandra, and Stephany earn frequent praise for attentiveness during tours and move-in. Renovated units are spacious and quiet, and management will work with tenants on lease terms. However, one recent resident has struggled for two months with an AC unit stuck above 78 degrees, with follow-up repair visits never materializing, suggesting that urgent problems may fall through the cracks. Tour experience and first impressions consistently impress. The dog park, pool, and fitness center draw interest. Some find rent steep, though move-in specials appear common. Best suited to people confident the office will advocate for them during lease negotiation, less ideal for anyone needing rapid maintenance response under stress.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

REVL Crockett Row

#108

70

REVL Crockett Row

4.3(139)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Revl Crockett Row attracts praise for its leasing and maintenance teams, who handle urgent requests quickly and treat residents as individuals. Staff members Luis, Gabby, Madison, Junior, and Hernan are named repeatedly for going above and beyond. The complex offers modern units, a distinctive third-floor amenity space, gym and pool, and strong security on West 7th. However, significant operational gaps undermine the experience. Pest issues appear in recent reviews; freezing pipes trigger false fire alarms at least 20 times yearly; unresolved move-out communication led to a resident having a $150 charge sent to collections without notice or itemization, damaging her credit; stolen items from storage units were denied coverage despite lease language promising financial responsibility; and heavy noise from nearby bars affects sleep. Hidden fees add $100 monthly, surprising residents at lease renewal.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Soltra Bear Creek

#109

70

Soltra Bear Creek

4.3(121)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Abriela and Elizabeth earn consistent praise for attentive, personalized service during move-in. The units themselves impress with modern design, high ceilings, and in-unit washers. But maintenance response times disappoint: residents report weeks-long waits for broken AC, electrical hazards, mold, and pest issues, with some marking tickets "resolved" despite no visit. Common areas stay poorly cleaned, gates remain unlocked, and reaching the office by phone remains difficult. One returning resident noted recent improvements in cleanliness and management responsiveness.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Junction Crossing Apartments

#110

63

Junction Crossing Apartments

3.8(244)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Brandon and the leasing team earn consistent praise for their knowledge and responsiveness during tours and early move-in. Amenities, including pools and a clubhouse, draw admiration. However, the complex suffers from a stark divide: residents report that management quality shifted noticeably under new leadership, with recurring failures in maintenance response, pest control, noise enforcement, and parking allocation. Many complaints centre on unresponsive office staff, privacy violations during maintenance, gate malfunctions, and billing disputes over move-out charges and stolen packages. Long-term residents and recent arrivals describe very different experiences, suggesting the property improved under a manager named Itzel but remains inconsistent. Staff like Brandon are praised when present, yet reviews note he lacks independence and relies heavily on others. The complex appears polished on tour but struggles with follow-through on repairs, cleanliness standards, and tenant communication once residents move in.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Ridgewood Preserve Apartment Homes

#111

70

Ridgewood Preserve Apartment Homes

4.1(246)✓ Google-verified

Office staff like Carlie, Lindsay, and Angela earn consistent praise for leasing support and flexibility during the application process. Once residents move in, experiences diverge sharply: some report quick maintenance responses and good communication, while others face months of unresolved plumbing, A/C, and mold problems paired with staff who avoid accountability. Move-in apartments have arrived filthy and non-functional. Noise complaints go unaddressed despite repeated calls and police involvement.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

#112

68

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

4.0(206)✓ Google-verified

Most residents enjoy the downtown location, amenities, and staff friendliness, with many praising same-day or next-day maintenance response. However, persistent mechanical issues-faulty AC, broken elevators, and frequent false fire alarms-undercut the experience for others, and some report incomplete repairs or delayed follow-up on service tickets.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living

Amherst Apartments

#113

69

Amherst Apartments

4.2(136)✓ Google-verified

Most five-star reviews highlight friendly office staff like Alissa and Sharetha, along with maintenance workers Arturo, Jesus, and Roger who respond quickly to repair requests and show genuine care for residents. However, recent one and four-star reviews paint a starkly different picture: residents report broken appliances left unrepaired for months, maintenance tickets marked complete without fixes, poor grounds upkeep, trash strewn across patios, and ongoing noise issues that persist despite complaints. Pricing around $1700 per month feels disconnected from the actual condition and care level some experience. The gap suggests possible staffing turnover or management change. While long-term residents and those paired with responsive staff praise Amherst highly, newer arrivals encounter delayed repairs, broken dishwashers, mold on move-in, and lack of accountability. The quiet safe feel is real for many, but several report they cannot rely on maintenance to follow through or grounds crew to maintain standards.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Bristol Grapevine

#114

68

Bristol Grapevine

4.1(435)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for attentiveness and patience, particularly Hailey, and residents appreciate the property's setting and pool amenities. However, management communication falters sharply once you move in: complaints about pest invasions, marijuana odors, and maintenance delays go unaddressed, and some describe an offsite management company that dismisses concerns rather than solve them. The leasing experience and first-time renter support stand out as strengths, but long-term residents report escalating frustration with the management company's negligence on urgent issues like water damage and health hazards. Timing varies from quick resolutions on minor repairs to weeks-long delays on serious problems.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Oakmont of Bear Creek Apartments

#115

69

Oakmont of Bear Creek Apartments

4.2(50)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise rapid maintenance response and attentive staff who make the community feel like home. The attached garages, clean grounds, and pool amenities are standouts, though some report confusion over smoking rules, rising rents, and occasional theft from driveways or doorways.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Grapevine Station Apartments

#116

68

Grapevine Station Apartments

4.1(150)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently praise the tight-knit staff and location walking distance to downtown Grapevine, and many have renewed multiple times. However, recent reports expose gaps: maintenance backlogs leave tenants without AC in summer heat for weeks, pest control appointments take months to confirm, and leasing staff inconsistently handle tours and questions. Staff like Elijah, Madison, and Brody earn genuine loyalty, and the complex itself stays clean and quiet. But service failures in repair prioritization and vendor coordination directly harm livability during emergencies, and the gap between five-star and one-star reviews suggests experience varies sharply depending on when problems occur and who handles them.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Park Creek Apartments

#117

67

Park Creek Apartments

4.0(205)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff-especially maintenance (Aaron, Daniel, Arnold, Steven) and front office (Michelle, Veronica, Kieyana, Estefania)-consistently go beyond the job to help tenants. Facilities stay clean, gym and pool work well, and move-outs are smooth. Security gaps remain a real problem: repeat car thefts, broken gates, and loud late-night pool use; dog waste rules are widely ignored.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Taj Mahal Apartments

#118

69

Taj Mahal Apartments

3.6(103)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently highlight stability and care across tenancies measured in decades. Jackie Sevilla (property manager), David, and Emad (maintenance) are named repeatedly for professionalism and fast response. All bills paid plus competitive rents draw cost-conscious renters; flooring upgrades and pool upkeep signal active reinvestment. Walking distance to retail, direct bus access, and a track record of second-chance acceptance define the offer. Long tenure records (10-20 years common) and absence of pest or appliance complaints in reviews suggest operational discipline. One recent cryptic note hints at generational stagnation, but overwhelmingly residents frame Taj Mahal as home, not temporary housing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Residence at Arbor Grove

#119

69

The Residence at Arbor Grove

4.2(47)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the welcoming staff, especially office team members Briana, McKenzie, and manager Andrea Cross, along with quick maintenance response. The property feels clean and well-kept, with active community events that help seniors connect. However, some report air conditioning failures, loose enforcement of the pet policy leading to large dogs on common grounds, and occasional elevator breakdowns. These issues appear sporadic rather than systemic, but matter most to older residents.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Huntington Meadows Apartments

#120

69

Huntington Meadows Apartments

4.1(447)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing staff (Stephanie, Kelsi, and others) draw five-star reviews for their tours and flexibility, and some residents report fast maintenance responses. However, persistent complaints dominate recent months: emergency calls go unanswered, maintenance staff skip work orders for weeks, roaches and ants infest units despite repeated fumigation, and broken floors and dishwashers get glued rather than replaced. Late arrivals for AC failures, towed cars, and maggot-infested hallways suggest management presence has gaps that front-office staff cannot close. Multiple residents report billing surprises and fee stacking (water, trash, condo service totaling over $300 monthly). The contrast suggests Huntington Meadows excels at first impression but falters once residents move in and need sustained property upkeep or emergency response.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Villas at Cantamar Apartments

#121

69

Villas at Cantamar Apartments

3.7(205)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members, particularly Jessica Soto and Alexia Perez, consistently receive praise for attentiveness and bilingual support during the leasing process. The property itself draws repeated compliments for cleanliness, attractive balconies, and amenities like the pool, with several reviewers noting swift and flexible move-in assistance. One significant concern surfaces: a disabled resident reports electric scooter accessibility blocked by vehicles parked illegally (nose-in rather than backed-in), alongside friction with a resident who ignores the lease parking rule. This isolated but serious issue contradicts the otherwise positive tenant experience and raises questions about lease enforcement consistency.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Huntley

#122

67

The Huntley

4.0(173)✓ Google-verified

The Huntley delivers strong first impressions: leasing staff like Shoni and Shawnie Davis earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and new units are clean and well-presented. However, long-term residents report serious frustration with thin walls, chronic parking garage theft, and a management that does not respond meaningfully to safety or noise complaints. The disconnect between the tour experience and life after move-in is stark.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

The Orchards at Arlington Highlands

#123

68

The Orchards at Arlington Highlands

4.4(63)✓ Google-verified

Most reviewers praise The Orchards for its welcoming community, attentive staff, and attractive layout in a convenient location. However, persistent complaints about maintenance responsiveness, extended pool downtime, and isolated but serious service failures create a wedge between top-tier experiences and resident frustration over building upkeep and consistency.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Griffin Apartments

#124

66

The Griffin Apartments

3.9(213)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff, notably Angel, earn consistent praise for patience and problem-solving, and front-desk workers like Christina and Shayla receive recognition for professionalism. However, move-in experience is marred by dirty units, broken appliances, and pests; repairs drag on for months despite multiple work orders, and office communication fails repeatedly-closed during stated hours, voicemail loops, unanswered emails. Several residents report deposit disputes and aggressive billing after move-out, with management unresponsive to itemized charge requests. The complex occupies a lower-income Fort Worth neighborhood and attracts tenants seeking affordability, yet the gap between staff goodwill and systemic dysfunction is stark. Residents describe noisy neighbors, neglected grounds, and mold issues alongside climate control failures. Those with positive experiences often credit individual staff members rather than property-wide standards, suggesting service depends heavily on who handles your case.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Flats at Brentwood

#125

68

Flats at Brentwood

4.0(321)✓ Google-verified

Isai Camacho and the leasing team excel during the application and move-in phase, earning consistent praise for speed and personality. After move-in, residents hit a wall: maintenance requests languish for months, staff dodge phone calls, and management communication drops sharply once tenants are signed. The grounds look sharp, and repair crews pitch in when they show up. But a resident waiting six months to have a dishwasher installed, combined with reports of homeless activity and understaffing, paint a picture of a complex that front-loads charm and then underdelivers on day-to-day service.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Belterra Apartments

#126

68

Belterra Apartments

4.0(253)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star and one-star reviews split sharply. New residents praise staff warmth and unit finishes; long-term tenants report mounting frustration with AC breakdowns (lasting months in summer heat), utility bills double the typical rate, and a cascade of unresolved maintenance issues from broken appliances to gnat infestations. Property grounds stay clean and the pool is well-kept, but package theft is rampant due to unmonitored mail rooms and open gates. Staff at the leasing office and corporate level earn consistent praise for courtesy and problem-solving, yet day-to-day maintenance struggles to keep systems running. Management has improved responsiveness at corporate level (some residents credit corporate intervention), but the tension between advertised luxury amenities and failing basics (working AC, reliable appliances, package safety) shows in retention: happy residents tour; unhappy ones leave. Long leases cost significantly more than the published rates suggest when utility overages are factored in.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Zenith

#127

68

Zenith

4.0(243)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the residents praise friendly staff like Anthony and Jeremy, vibrant community events by Josiah and Kathryn, and quick maintenance turnarounds. The other half struggle with unresolved AC and EV charger outages lasting months, hallways that smell and lack cleaning, parking so tight that finding a spot after 6 PM is nearly impossible, and a front office that often ignores calls and takes 15 months to return deposits.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Republic Deer Creek Apartments

#128

61

Republic Deer Creek Apartments

3.6(156)✓ Google-verified

Five-star residents praise staff warmth, quick maintenance turnarounds, and attractive grounds. However, a vocal minority reports months-long unresolved repairs (washing machine, AC), dismissed concerns, pest infestations at move-in, and noise complaints ignored. Rent increases without corresponding unit improvements and potential electrical wiring issues also emerged as pain points for longer-term residents.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Club at Stonegate Apartments

#129

66

The Club at Stonegate Apartments

3.9(347)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong individual maintenance staff (Rod, Ron) earn five-star praise for speed and professionalism, and the location near TCU, Trader Joe's, and quiet streets appeals to residents. However, the business's shift to AI-only customer support creates a communication wall: prospective and current residents report weeks without callback, missed pest control requests, and contaminated common areas going uncleaned. Management dismisses serious issues like mold and vomit-stained stairs as routine, charges hit residents by surprise at move-out (one tenant paid $5,740 to exit early), and deposits rarely return intact. The core problem is not the units or their price, but the organization behind them. Reviews praise the complex's quiet feel and landscaping, yet simultaneously describe roaches, ceiling water damage, malfunctioning appliances, and stairwells left in biohazard condition for months. When residents tried to contact staff in person, they found the office empty despite posted hours. The contract itself locks people in with opacity: one longtime tenant learned of $100+ mystery fees only after moving in, and another discovered move-out penalties far steeper than anticipated.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

North Hills Crest Apartments

#130

67

North Hills Crest Apartments

4.4(60)✓ Google-verified

Edna and the maintenance team earn consistent five-star praise for responsiveness and kindness, and residents value the all-bills-paid model and safety. Recent ownership changes have brought harder fee policies, though, and several tenants report roaches, unreasonable move-out inspections, and noise issues that contradict the peaceful experience longer-term residents describe. The complex suits people on tight budgets who prioritize utilities included and staff support, but those sensitive to pest problems or strict about lease enforcement should consider elsewhere.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Magnolia on Oak Street

#131

67 low data

Magnolia on Oak Street

4.7(19)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise Tamra's responsive management and the clean, modern townhomes near downtown Roanoke. One recurring noise issue: trains pass 30 feet away. Parking enforcement inconsistencies frustrate some tenants, though staff address problems when raised.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Vineyards at Trophy Club

#132

67

The Vineyards at Trophy Club

4.1(89)✓ Google-verified

Two years is common; those who stay love the upkeep and staff warmth, especially maintenance responding fast and the office team organizing bingo nights and community events. The Trophy Club location near shopping and parks keeps daily life convenient. But new residents or those leaving report sharp turns in how they are treated: one named leasing manager gets repeated complaints for rudeness and alleged discrimination, while air conditioning issues left unrepaired for months contradict the praised maintenance reputation.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Laurel Heights at Cityview

#133

65

Laurel Heights at Cityview

3.8(363)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing team and maintenance response draw praise, but recurring appliance failures and parking issues frustrate long-term residents. Recent improvements to gates and water service suggest management is addressing past problems, though enforcement gaps remain.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Wimbledon Oaks

#134

66

Wimbledon Oaks

4.0(322)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Wimbledon Oaks draws mixed reviews: some residents praise the maintenance team's kindness when they show up, but chronic complaints center on unresolved issues. Hot water failures recur monthly, AC repairs stall for weeks in summer heat, and pest problems persist despite claims of cleanliness. Management responsiveness has declined under recent leadership, leaving residents frustrated when basic services fail.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Savoy

#135

64

The Savoy

4.0(89)✓ Google-verified

Residents split sharply on The Savoy. Those staying long-term praise staff like Kyndra and maintenance team (Dee, Jay, Lester) for genuine care and quick repairs. Others faced months of unresolved Wi-Fi failures, pest issues after move-in, maintenance entering without notice, and management that felt argumentative rather than helpful when problems escalated. The complex offers affordable living and a quiet setting, but recurring infrastructure and accountability gaps push some renters to break leases early.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Arlie

#136

66

The Arlie

3.9(388)✓ Google-verified

Tours are consistently praised for friendly staff like Musab, Daniela, and Genesis, and proximity to UTA is a genuine draw. Residents report a marked decline in property upkeep, management responsiveness, and problem-solving over recent years, with pervasive roach issues, grimy common areas, and surprise fees dominating complaints even from those who initially found the place liveable.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

City Parc at Keller Apartments

#137

66

City Parc at Keller Apartments

3.9(338)✓ Google-verified

Strong five-star reviews center on Daryl Pruitt's responsiveness and professionalism, fast emergency repairs, and welcoming office staff like Brittany and Julie. One-star complaints flip the narrative: slow or unfinished maintenance requests marked as closed, pest control billed but ineffective, bitter moveout disputes over phantom damages, and chronic unit failures (AC, hinges, thermostats). Management is praised when present, but some residents report phone and email silence during crucial moments. The gap between five-star longtermers and one-star leavers reveals a sharp divide. Residents staying years rave about the crew and grounds. Those departing report discovering they were charged for preexisting damage that management never documented, and pest and mechanical issues that persist for months. A handful name Daryl as the only reliable fix; others cite him as part of their worst experience.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Chapel Creek Cottages

#138

63

Chapel Creek Cottages

4.1(58)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Chapel Creek offers appealing cottages in a quiet, gated community with staff who shine when they engage directly. However, residents report inconsistent maintenance response, communication barriers through automated systems, and amenity upkeep issues that persist when not actively chased down.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Bexley Arcadia

#139

64

Bexley Arcadia

3.9(135)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff earn consistent praise for speed and friendliness, and three leasing agents (Zyra, Angel, Breann) stand out for patience and problem-solving. The units themselves are clean and well-equipped. However, senior management is the persistent weak point: unresponsive calls, ignoring residents in office, slow resolution on long-term problems like mold and broken appliances. Common areas have deteriorated since Weinstein Properties took over. Those living here succeed by building relationships with specific staff members rather than relying on formal processes. Quality swings sharply between individuals. Maintenance technician Lallish, for example, has fixed complex issues same-visit; others initially misdiagnosed mold as dust. Residents report waiting months for appliance replacement while managers deflect. Pet owners note friendly dogs around the complex. Parking and security complaints suggest inconsistent enforcement.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Drake on Summit Apartments

#140

64

The Drake on Summit Apartments

3.8(210)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Drake on Summit attracts renters with its modern amenities and walkable location near downtown Fort Worth, but the experience deteriorates significantly after move-in. Residents report cleanliness that went from acceptable to deplorable within months, broken security doors that anyone can bypass, rampant car break-ins in an unpatrolled garage, and an overwhelmed or indifferent maintenance team that responds quickly to some requests but then goes silent for weeks on critical issues like mold and AC failures. The sky deck and gym are real draws; the frustration is real too. Fire alarms blast at odd hours for years until a vendor switch helps. Management uses AI phone trees that trap callers, then charges residents for security deposit deductions without documentation. Early residents loved it here; recent ones feel unsafe and neglected. Some staff shine (Chris, Kelly, Natalie handling positive interactions), but the system behind them has fractured.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

StoneLedge Apartments Grapevine

#141

65

StoneLedge Apartments Grapevine

3.9(133)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise the pool, fitness amenities, and maintenance responsiveness, but move-out becomes the breaking point for many. Office staff frequently unavailable; when management gives verbal instructions, they later deny conversations happened. Move-out bills often spike hundreds of dollars for carpet, walls, or "cleaning," despite tenants saying they left units clean. One tenant documented damage to credit score after disputing charges years later. A few leasing consultants (Danielle, Koree) get consistent five-star mention for warmth and efficiency, yet management reputations fracture fast. The property appeals to those staying years; new residents report tour mix-ups and expectations misalignment. Noise near the fire station and highway mars some units. The tension: beautiful grounds and good maintenance work undercut by what reviewers call predatory billing practices at checkout.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Oak Park

#142

61

Oak Park

3.7(805)✓ Google-verified

Staff at this complex go the extra mile-Leasing agents like Alex, Raquel, and Deja earn genuine praise for kindness and responsiveness. Move-in and day-to-day interactions feel warm. The grounds are well-treed and quiet, popular with families. Behind the friendly front desk sits a harder truth: maintenance backlogs are serious. Residents report washing machines that don't dry, AC out for weeks in Texas heat, roaches that return same-day after spraying, water seeping through walls during rain, and units handed over with broken appliances and exposed wires. When residents push back, some staff (notably, one assistant manager) turn dismissive. The complex feels disorganized at the operational level.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

District at LeftBank

#143

66

District at LeftBank

3.9(291)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Six months of ownership transition split resident experience sharply. New management draws immediate praise for responsiveness, quick repairs, and staff warmth from leasing team members including Britain, Adrienne, Sophia, Nicole, and Lauryn. Long-term residents report the change as tangible improvement over prior neglect. However, underlying building infrastructure issues persist: repeated water damage from burst sprinkler pipes, black mold left unpainted over, non-functional elevators and security gates, and roach infestations unresolved despite eight pest control visits. Residents also report misleading verbal fee assurances followed by thousands in unexpected charges including reletting fees. Pet owners praise the dog park and washing station, but common areas remain littered with dog waste and hallways smell of smoke and urine. The property's core appeal remains location and layout for those drawn to West 7th proximity and spacious units. Staff turnover and management change inject hope, yet reviews suggest structural and institutional problems require more than friendly faces to fix.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

University House TCU

#144

66

University House TCU

4.1(60)✓ Google-verified

Most current residents praise quick maintenance, friendly staff, and spotless apartments within walking distance of campus. Covered parking and study amenities draw repeat praise. Historical concerns about pest control and administrative practices surface in older reviews; current feedback suggests these may have improved, though move-in practices warrant clarification before signing.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Vine South

#145

64

Vine South

4.1(72)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Vine South draws strong praise for its quiet, tree-lined setting near good schools and for maintenance staff who respond quickly to work orders. But recent reviews expose a split experience: some residents praise affordable rent and friendly office staff by name, while others report cockroaches at move-in, unresponsive management, high fees for lease breaks or packages, and a front office perceived as dismissive. The property appears well-kept, yet operational fairness and pest prevention remain pain points.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

The Estates at Ridglea Hills

#146

62

The Estates at Ridglea Hills

3.9(181)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the pet-friendly policies, spacious layouts, and consistently helpful maintenance staff by name. The location suits families seeking a calm community. However, pest problems persist despite treatment, hot water and AC failures recur seasonally, and towing company practices are expensive and controversial. Management communication gaps on safety and maintenance issues create tension with some residents, though other reviews report quick responses.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

South 400

#147

65

South 400

3.9(146)✓ Google-verified

South 400 residents consistently praise the maintenance team and office staff for going above and beyond, with Joan specifically noted for solving problems quickly and respectfully. However, serious security failures undermine the "luxury" positioning: packages vanish from an unsecured mail room, elevator and garage failures persist, and one resident reported being entered on without notice during a vulnerable moment. The property splits sharply between those who value personal service and those frustrated by infrastructure gaps and theft. The leasing office staff (Anna Lainez, Ashley, Katie) earn high marks for responsiveness and kindness during the application and move-in phases. A three-year resident calls it the best place they have lived. Maintenance requests are often handled within 30 minutes. Yet multiple one-star reviews and a vocal complaint about "careless management" over a year-long pattern of unresolved issues suggest management has struggled to act on resident feedback or prevent systemic problems.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Bell Lancaster Apartments

#148

63

Bell Lancaster Apartments

3.7(259)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Karen and the maintenance team earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine care, making leasing and repairs straightforward. That goodwill runs into a wall of systemic problems: water damage left unrepaired for years, unsanitary common areas, frequent management changes that leave tenants without clear accountability, and billing errors around move-in promotions. One resident paid $800 extra after being rushed into a lease without receiving promised rent concessions. The property has real strengths in its units and staff presence, but struggles to translate day-to-day friendliness into reliable property management. Issues pile up (dumpster overflow, dog waste on grounds, pool maintenance failures) and linger. Lease disputes after move-out add friction. For those who find the right unit and avoid maintenance crises, Bell Lancaster works. For others, poor follow-through on repairs and management inconsistency creates years of frustration.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Rise West Arlington

#149

65

Rise West Arlington

3.9(224)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism during the move-in process, and some residents report enjoying quiet living once settled. However, widespread complaints about roaches, rats, and mice dominate recent reviews, with residents citing six months of unresolved pest issues despite monthly extermination charges. Maintenance backlog is severe with only two workers for the entire complex and work orders allegedly marked complete without actual repairs. Hidden fees stack monthly on top of advertised rent, pushing real costs well above quoted prices. Initial unit condition often falls short, with moldy appliances, structural damage, and pest evidence appearing at move-in or shortly after. Reviewers describe thin walls, outdated finishes, and band-aid repairs that fail quickly. Some residents report a recent surge of five-star reviews from first-time reviewers posted on the same dates, raising credibility concerns alongside documented lease-breaking and legal action by frustrated tenants.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Reese at Eastchase

#150

65

The Reese at Eastchase

4.1(222)✓ Google-verified

Residents report that maintenance requests go unaddressed for weeks or months, with AC failures during hot Texas summers and plumbing issues left unresolved. Staff members like Cree are noted for helpfulness, but broader management appears indifferent to living conditions; pest problems, mold, broken gates, and car break-ins are recurring complaints despite residents paying pest control and mandatory fees. The grounds look maintained from the street, and pricing attracts renters, yet the actual units frequently arrive dirty and smoky, with inadequate HVAC and infrastructure problems that worsen over time. Multiple residents describe the experience as unsafe and deceptive given the advertised quality versus actual conditions.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Ironcrest Apartments

#151

65

Ironcrest Apartments

4.0(121)✓ Google-verified

Individual staff members (Liz, Bryon, Crystal) earn consistent 5-star praise for attentive leasing and maintenance help. However, the property suffers from serious systemic failures: pest infestations unresolved over months, voicemails and emails ignored for weeks, management unresponsive to domestic violence situations and tenant safety concerns, and maintenance teams accused of filing false service reports. Parking security lapses and pool closures without notice compound resident frustration.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Bexley at Left Bank

#152

64

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(228)✓ Google-verified

The complex divides sharply: residents praise maintenance team members like Erin and Josh for fast, professional repairs, and appreciate community events. However, leasing office communication is inconsistent, with many reporting ignored calls and slow issue resolution. Serious concerns include lingering pet odors in hallways, thin walls that carry neighbor noise and cooking smells, pest infestations left unaddressed for months, and instances of billing disputes that damaged credit without signed leases. Building systems (gates, windows) also show wear and slow repair timelines. Layout and construction issues persist throughout: gaps in windows and doors, poor soundproofing, and insufficient weekend cleaning of common areas. The complex shines when upper management visits but struggles with daily operations. Staff quality varies widely by department, with some residents crediting recent hires Daniel and Erica for improving communication, while others cite years of being ignored by the office.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Villa Bella

#153

65

Villa Bella

3.8(229)✓ Google-verified

The leasing office, especially Jennifer and Myrna, earns consistent praise for warmth and accommodation during move-in. Five-year residents note the current management team has improved service response. However, multiple recent complaints center on air conditioning breakdowns during heat waves with delayed fixes, pest sightings, and one serious lock-out incident where staff failed to communicate or verify tenant status before breaching a unit. The property appeals to location-conscious renters near schools and highways, but the gap between "newly renovated" marketing claims and lived reality troubles budget-conscious renters. Laundry facilities are modern and 24/7, though the wider property reads as aging. Staff responsiveness is genuine, yet maintenance urgency does not match tenant need during summer emergencies.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Aura Southgate

#154

65

Aura Southgate

4.1(112)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Aura Southgate delivers strong amenities and genuine warmth from specific staff members-Marcus in maintenance, Annaka at leasing, and several team members earn consistent praise for responsiveness. Yet the experience fractures between move-in and move-out: residents pay $2,500+/month total and face noise through thin walls, parking friction, delayed repairs (AC outages lasting five months), and heavy move-out charges ($300+ for carpet) that many dispute. A handful of five-star reviewers love it; many who stayed longer or faced hardship say the price and marketing as "luxury" don't match the day-to-day reality. The leasing office turnover and inconsistent staff conduct-passive-aggressive email tone, dismissive attitudes toward maintenance requests, aggressive lease-signing pressure-undercut the positive front-desk moments. Smoke seeping into units and management's inaction on a non-smoking policy breach compound the discord. For renters willing to ignore thin walls and parking strain, the gym, pool, and open community events have real appeal. For others, the gap between the tour and the lease end proves costly.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

CoHo Apartments

#155

65 low data

CoHo Apartments

4.4(23)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents love the walkable South Main location, quick maintenance response, and the high-tech Ori furniture that appeals to minimalists. Recent concerns center on management transitions: security deposits held beyond Texas law timelines, AC failures not properly repaired, and broken gate access. Strongest reviews praise named staff like Kim, Tony, and Camryn. Weakest highlight legal and safety oversights under newer management.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Venue at 8651 Apartments

#156

65

Venue at 8651 Apartments

3.8(524)✓ Google-verified

Venue at 8651 earns strong marks for maintenance staff who fix issues quickly and explain problems clearly, plus clean grounds and package lockers that reviewers value. However, serious concerns emerge around unresponsive management, delays in processing transfers and refunds, pest-infested move-in units, and surprise visitor parking charges and towing policies that left tenants frustrated.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Atlantic Station

#157

65

The Atlantic Station

3.8(329)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and those greeted by the office team praise responsive staff and a well-maintained community with solid amenities and family events. However, recent concerns center on unprofessional phone support, undisclosed pest problems at move-in, slow appliance repairs, and amenities that don't work reliably, creating a gap between what's promised and what residents experience day-to-day.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Bottle House on Main

#158

65

Bottle House on Main

3.8(256)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews hinge on specific staff: Edgar handles maintenance repairs quickly, Tristun and Gigi excel at tours, and Kaleigh runs operations smoothly. One-star reviews expose the flip side: front desk communication fails, hallways and elevators look neglected, pool and gym upkeep slip, and residents report vehicle vandalism and disputes over towing. Staff inconsistency appears to be the fault line. Where a skilled leasing agent or maintenance member steps in, people feel heard and cared for. Without that personal touch, the same complex feels unresponsive and dirty. Location near downtown and amenities impress; follow-through on cleanliness and security does not.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Southern Oaks Apartments

#159

65

Southern Oaks Apartments

3.9(130)✓ Google-verified

Brenda and Norma in the office set Southern Oaks apart with genuine care and patience through the leasing process. Glenn Jones and the maintenance team handle repairs quickly and professionally. But the complex struggles with serious gaps: recent residents report mice in walls, mold odor, pest control marked complete when untreated, and frustration over pet policy disclosure and post-move billing disputes. Location near shopping is a draw, and many find it quiet for a city complex. Long-term residents praise the family feel and how staff know tenants by name. New arrivals, though, sometimes encounter uninhabitable conditions on move-in and hit walls when asking for lease releases. The split between five-star praise for staff and one-star warnings about hidden problems suggests experience varies sharply by unit and timing.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Flats on Mill

#160

63

Flats on Mill

3.7(229)✓ Google-verified

Flats on Mill splits sharply between residents who praise responsive staff (especially leasing agent Janneth) and fast maintenance, and those who report cockroaches, safety issues, and surprise fees that spike after ownership changes. Repairs arrive within hours or a day when things work, but communication breakdowns and unexplained lock-outs mar the experience for frustrated tenants. The bark park stays stocked, and some residents enjoy quiet sections with good neighbors. Yet pest control monthly charges do not guarantee service visits, and amenities like the pool have sat unused for years. New management appears to be turning the ship, but older complaints about fees and bugs linger.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

#161

63

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

3.8(103)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the residents report exceptional care from management (especially Nicole) and quick maintenance, citing clean spaces and a welcoming vibe. The other half describe chronic leaks, locked office doors during business hours, slow or ignored repair requests, and interactions with the same manager that feel dismissive or hostile, ranging from hang-ups during emergencies to perceived unfair treatment. Management credibility splits sharply on this point: several five-star reviews credit Nicole with professionalism and hard work; multiple one-star reviews call her unorganized, unwelcoming, and unavailable. Flooding recurs as a maintenance failure. Parking policy changes (free to reserved) drew frustration. Review recency and edit history suggest ongoing tension rather than resolution.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Central Park Townhomes

#162

57 low data

Central Park Townhomes

3.6(74)✓ Google-verified

This townhome community earns strong praise for individual staff members who respond quickly to problems, and families value the yards, quiet blocks, and proximity to schools. However, the business suffers from long-standing structural problems: maintenance backlogs that stretch weeks, repeated management company changes leaving residents unable to reach anyone, and unit defects including mold, water leaks, and outdated systems that go unfixed despite rent collection. Recent years have seen management instability and move-out disputes over deposits.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Historic Electric Building Apartments

#163

62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Resort at 925

#164

62

Resort at 925

4.1(45)✓ Google-verified

Staff and location draw consistent five-star praise, with management named by name for going above and beyond. However, the elevator system has become a persistent liability: reviewers report multiple outages over years, entrapment during summer heat, and management refusal to replace 18-year-old equipment despite repeated failures. At nearly $3,000 a month, residents feel this cost is unjustified given the deteriorating infrastructure and lack of compensation for disruption. Recent arrivals remain optimistic about onboarding and the property's upscale feel, but long-term residents express frustration with rent increases and unresolved maintenance that management calls "out of control."

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

The Logan

#165

63

The Logan

3.8(357)✓ Google-verified

The Logan draws strong loyalty from residents who value staff attentiveness and peaceful grounds, but frustration runs deep over maintenance delays on critical systems and an aggressive towing policy that hits guests and residents with hundreds in fees. Quality hinges on which staff member you encounter and how quickly the maintenance team prioritizes your issue.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Crawford

#166

63

The Crawford

3.8(127)✓ Google-verified

Top staff members like Annessa and McKenzie earn high marks for patience and professionalism during tours, and the property itself impresses with clean, spacious units and high-end finishes. However, the experience fractures badly when other leasing agents appear: prospective tenants report rudeness, ignored emails, repeated technical failures, and zero follow-up after paying application fees. Residents also cite persistent noise complaints, weak enforcement of quiet hours, and unresponsive management that sends templated replies but takes no action. The Crawford markets itself as resort-style and welcoming, yet its reputation hinges entirely on which staff member you meet first. Repeated complaints name specific agents as barriers, and some applicants walked away mid-tour feeling disrespected. Those already living here praise responsive staff in some contexts, yet noise and trash issues linger unresolved.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Parkside on the Creek Apartments

#167

63

Parkside on the Creek Apartments

3.7(59)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and recent visitors consistently praise the maintenance team for same-day repairs and staff members like Makayla and Yolanda for genuine warmth and professionalism. The community appeals to families and quiet-seekers, with walking trails, dog parks, and respectful neighbors. Ongoing complaints center on parking cramping, early morning leaf-blowing, management responsiveness lapses, and pricing relative to unit square footage.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Liv+ Arlington

#168

63

Liv+ Arlington

3.8(624)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Liv+ lures students in with a polished showroom and friendly leasing staff like Calvin or Cassandra, but many who move in face a harsh reality: roach-infested units, dirty fixtures, broken furniture, and water-marked walls nowhere close to the tour experience. Maintenance responds quickly when called, and some team members (Calvin, Josh, Abigail, Quay) earn genuine praise for patience and professionalism. However, office communication falls apart after lease signing-calls go unreturned for days, billing errors are hard to dispute, and fees for early move-in or paid valet trash feel arbitrary. The office manager Karen has made residents feel dismissed and disrespected when raising legitimate concerns. For students, the furnished rooms and campus shuttle appeal, but the gap between promise and delivery, combined with ongoing pest battles and communication breakdowns, leaves many wishing they'd chosen The Arlie or Campus Edge instead.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Paloma Village

#169

60

Paloma Village

3.8(56)✓ Google-verified

Half the reviews praise the modern finishes, welcoming staff (especially Madison and Leslie), and quick maintenance. The other half report severe soundproofing gaps and dispute aggressive move-out charges for normal wear and tear, including fridge door discoloration and carpet cleaning costs. Management enforces tenant fees tightly but overlooks violations: unregistered dog breeds, pet waste throughout grounds, smoking indoors, and non-resident amenity use. Several residents cite safety lapses, including a protruding nail that required medical attention and mushrooms in the dog park.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Stella

#170

63

The Stella

3.7(211)✓ Google-verified

Staff turnover in recent months improved the experience, with newer management (Ashley, Brenda, Tresh) earning consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, long-standing operational problems persist: multiple residents report systematic billing errors, overcharges they had to catch themselves, and move-out fees charged despite miscommunication from the office. Safety is a critical concern repeated across recent reviews, with residents documenting frequent police activity for overdoses, open drug use on common grounds, and homeless people at night. Move-in conditions were poor enough several residents photographed damage and filth; pest problems and cigarette odor have made units uncomfortable for families. Maintenance crew responds quickly and professionally. The office staff under new management are friendly and helpful with lease questions. Yet billing remains chaotic, move-out procedures unclear, and the neighborhood environment at portions of the complex is unsafe enough that residents felt they could not walk alone or recommend the property despite appreciating the staff. The gap between what residents were charged and what they received is the core frustration.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Woodbridge Townhomes

#171

56

Woodbridge Townhomes

3.4(105)✓ Google-verified

Since 2023, the new management team has earned consistent praise for responsiveness and property upkeep, with staff like Eric, Laura, and Charlie winning specific recognition for friendly, knowledgeable service. Reviewers report quiet, spacious townhomes in a convenient location, and those who work with the current team find maintenance handled promptly. However, complaints surface around office communication gaps, delayed appliance repairs, pest infestations, and limited parking (two spots per unit). Some residents report water and sewage overcharges, and one long-term tenant described management becoming unresponsive after complaints, including refusing to investigate suspected mold. The property's older bones and inconsistency between office and maintenance responsiveness leave mixed experiences.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Royal St. Moritz

#172

61

Royal St. Moritz

3.7(183)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Loyal residents praise responsive maintenance and a good Grapevine location, but a sharp divide emerges. Many multi-year tenants report no pest issues and say staff cares; newer arrivals encounter filthy units, roach infestations across hallways and apartments, uncleaned carpets, damaged fixtures, and management dismissal of complaints. AC repairs require escalation, common areas stay littered with trash and weed smoke, and move-out fees shock departing tenants.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Carmel Creekside Apartments

#173

63

Carmel Creekside Apartments

3.7(347)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the location, cleanliness, and handful of exceptional staff members like Paige, who genuinely help tenants navigate issues. However, a persistent pattern emerges: AC units fail monthly and go weeks unrepaired, management ignores escalations, roof leaks are left unchecked, noise complaints bring no resolution, and residents report safety incidents including shootings. Multiple tenants cite hidden fees that push actual rent far above advertised rates. The leasing office makes strong first impressions with friendly application help, but maintenance responses become minimal once you move in. Repairs either drag on indefinitely or contractors do poor work. Several long-term residents who loved the community at first eventually left due to compounded maintenance failures and management's refusal to treat concerns seriously.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Mateo Apartment Homes

#174

63

Mateo Apartment Homes

3.7(336)✓ Google-verified

New management has won over residents with attentive office staff (Dahlia, Vanessa, Dalila named repeatedly), quick approvals and move-ins, and visible property fixes over recent months. But serious problems persist: widespread roach infestations, the pool closed for months with no real work, garbage cans overflowing across the complex, and calls and emails going unanswered. Residents praise individual staff while simultaneously warning others away due to facility neglect and fees that don't match services. The split between five-star endorsements of the office team and one-star warnings about conditions suggests management is actively improving communication and paperwork, yet the physical plant and pest control remain unresolved. Long-term residents report a three-year cycle of management changes, with this latest team earning goodwill faster than prior ownership but not fast enough to fix deep maintenance backlog.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Rise Spring Pointe

#175

63

Rise Spring Pointe

3.7(221)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Dee, Natasha, Christina, Allen, and Harold earn consistent praise for speed and kindness during leasing and maintenance. Units arrive clean with washers and dryers included. Move-in approvals happen fast. Long-term residents report years of neglect: heat outages during winter with young children, broken kitchen fixtures, ceiling leaks, hot-water failures, pests, stolen car wheels, towing disputes, and parking sign delays. Management denies responsibility and refuses refunds. Security gate failures permitted crime, including an elderly resident's murder. The gap between welcoming initial service and absent follow-through defines the experience.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Encore on Mustang Apartments

#176

61

The Encore on Mustang Apartments

3.6(152)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviewers praise staff like Silvia, Norma, and Karina for going above and beyond during tours and move-ins, noting clean units and quiet surroundings. One-star reviewers report roach problems, communication breakdowns, surprise move-out charges without explanation, and towed cars, painting a starkly different picture of the same complex. The gap between experiences suggests inconsistency in how the complex handles maintenance, enforcement, and resident relations. Newer residents or those who engaged closely with office staff report satisfaction, while longer-term residents face mounting frustrations with pests, utilities, and administrative practices.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Mylo Apartment Homes

#177

61

Mylo Apartment Homes

3.6(439)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Nancy, Susan, Kyle, and Jason earn consistent praise for friendliness and quick service, especially during move-in and maintenance calls. However, residents report severe pest problems, unresolved AC and water damage, ignored maintenance requests, and poor trash pickup, with some families leaving after short stays due to heat and bug infestations. The welcome experience masks a pattern once you move in: work orders sit, pest control visits don't happen despite scheduled spraying, and management responses range from dismissive to accusatory. For families needing reliable upkeep and pest control, the gaps between promised service and delivery are significant.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Heather Glen Townhomes

#178

62

Heather Glen Townhomes

3.7(169)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The sales team shines: leasing staff like Victoria, Maria, and Kathy are patient and welcoming during tours. Early experiences feel comfortable and quiet. Once residents settle in, the picture darkens. Maintenance requests disappear from the system or close without being done. Pest control is inadequate. Air conditioning outages drag for weeks despite promises. Long-term residents report a cycle of broken commitments and slow repairs, creating a gulf between the friendly leasing office and the reality of living here. For tenants, this is a complex trade. Staff professionalism persists, but the core services fall short. The gap between what leasing staff promise and what maintenance delivers is the core complaint. Rent is due on time, yet repairs lag for months. If you are risk-averse or sensitive to delays, proceed cautiously; enthusiastic early reviews fade as maintenance frustrations mount.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Sansom Ridge Apartments

#179

62

Sansom Ridge Apartments

4.1(47)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Rosetta, Bren'Sha, Sabrina, and Lisa earn consistent praise for friendliness and genuine helpfulness. The property offers spacious units, a food pantry, community events, and quiet grounds at an affordable price. However, residents report serious maintenance gaps: roach infestations staff cannot control, trash accumulation, package theft from unlocked office storage, and parking lot safety concerns (unsupervised children, car break-ins, towing company damage). Office management has been unresponsive to payment questions and resident concerns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Maxwell Apartments

#180

60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(342)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing and management staff, especially Alice and Veronica, earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism. However, maintenance response times have declined significantly under new leadership. Residents report week-long waits for repairs, repeated AC failures, and unresolved issues like malfunctioning gates and pest problems. Move-in experience is typically smooth, but post-move conflicts over deposits and fees (especially involving the AI chatbot) have escalated disputes. The complex's physical appearance draws approval when maintained, yet critical systems like cooling and emergency contact lines frequently fail. Those relocating for work value the location near Stockyards and Sundance Square; families should weigh maintenance reliability against the competitive leasing team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Tides at Eastchase

#181

59

Tides at Eastchase

3.0(292)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise staff warmth and the property's spacious layouts, but recent reviews reveal a breakdown in essential services. AC failures have left dozens without cooling for weeks, repair requests go unanswered, the maintenance team is drastically understaffed, and management responses range from unavailable to evasive. Common area cleanliness is noted, yet pet waste management and pest control remain persistent frustrations despite repeated complaints. The complex has cycled through multiple management companies and staffing changes. When dedicated property managers like Aide Aguilar, Andrea Smith, or Diamond Torres are present, residents report genuine responsiveness and quick email replies. However, these bright spots sit against a pattern of deferred maintenance, broken communication, and a gap between what management claims it can do (like providing portable AC) and what it actually delivers.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Athena Apartment Homes

#182

59

Athena Apartment Homes

3.4(270)

New management has sparked optimism among some residents, with Megan and her team earning praise for responsiveness and willingness to fix problems. However, the complex remains hobbled by long-standing infrastructure issues: water shutoffs happen regularly without notice, roach infestations persist despite pest control fees, landscaping goes unmowed for weeks, and maintenance repairs drag on or go unfinished. The split between five-star and one/two-star reviews reflects genuine improvement efforts colliding with decades of deferred upkeep that one management change alone cannot quickly resolve.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Lost Spurs Ranch Apartments

#183

62

Lost Spurs Ranch Apartments

3.6(199)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff earn consistent praise for quick responses, but serious gaps in property management undercut the experience. A detailed report documents mold contamination left unaddressed for months, unqualified contractors, and health impacts on residents. Meanwhile, fees stack up (trash, valet, pest control, amenity charges) and rents have climbed sharply, frustrating long-term renters despite a pleasant physical setting.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Residences at Eastland

#184

62 low data

Residences at Eastland

3.7(115)✓ Google-verified

Management quality varies sharply. When engaged, property managers like Andria earn strong praise for attentiveness. However, staffing gaps, slow maintenance response, and selective rule enforcement undermine trust. Location and cleanliness are noted positives.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Monticello Crossroads

#185

59

Monticello Crossroads

3.6(146)✓ Google-verified

New management has won over some residents with responsive service and visible improvements, but chronic maintenance failures and poor communication undermine trust. Air conditioning repairs drag for months while residents pay full rent for amenities that sit unused; office hours go unstaffed and emails go unanswered. Recent leasing managers Johan and Roger earn consistent praise, yet the gap between their helpfulness and the maintenance team's slowness has left multiple residents filing complaints with Texas authorities.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Burnett Lofts

#186

60

Burnett Lofts

3.6(117)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Burnett Lofts holds a 3.6 rating across 117 Google reviews. A detailed sentiment read was not produced on this pass, so the placement rests on rating consistency and volume.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

McCart Apartments

#187

61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Axis Waterfront

#188

59

Axis Waterfront

3.0(306)✓ Google-verified

The leasing office staff, especially Henry and Trenna, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and fast approvals, making the rental process smooth for relocating families. Behind that friendly front sits a complex with persistent maintenance failures: roaches and gnats in units, weekly water outages, aging electrical systems, and management that ignores concerns or resists early lease termination despite serious safety issues. Maintenance problems appear intermittent rather than universal, but when they occur, complaints about unresponsive management and billing disputes dominate. Residents report staying years when satisfied, and pet owners appreciate the dog amenities. Long-term renewals suggest the community works for some, while others describe their experience as unsafe and unmanageable.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Evergreen at Hulen Bend

#189

61

Evergreen at Hulen Bend

3.9(63)✓ Google-verified

Evergreen has a committed core of long-term residents who praise the grounds, location, and when management is stable, the friendliness of staff like Ms. Clemons and earlier maintenance teams. However, recent management changes have triggered departures, with multiple seniors reporting slow work order completion, hallway sanitation issues (pet waste, mold from leaks), harsh enforcement of parking violations, and deposit disputes that left residents feeling disrespected rather than cared for. The property struggles with consistency. Good maintenance staff and responsive management earn five-star ratings; poor communication, staff turnover, and health concerns in common areas drive one- and two-star reviews. Senior residents especially cite feeling dismissed when their requests go unanswered or when management lacks empathy during medical crises.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Cobble Hill

#190

59

Cobble Hill

3.5(126)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are enthusiastic; the other half report serious problems. Recent arrivals and visitors praise the new manager Devin and staff member Kellie, clean spaces, and fair pricing around $875 monthly. But long-term residents describe years of roach infestations, slow pest control responses, and office staff (particularly Lori) who ignore maintenance requests and don't answer calls. A few moved to different buildings and still faced infestations. Communication breakdowns extend to canceling tours without notice and denying refundable application fees. For affordability and pets, this complex works. The grounds have improved under new management. But verify pest control thoroughly before signing a lease, especially for units toward the back of the property. Ask for a pre-move inspection and get promises about pest treatment in writing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Landry at Cross Creek

#191

61

Landry at Cross Creek

3.7(110)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise the spacious units and staff warmth (Abby, Kayla, and Kaedee named repeatedly as patient and helpful), with some noting fair deposit refunds and reliable maintenance. The property loses points sharply on noise: multiple reviewers report constant sound from above and ineffective complaint resolution, with management's standard fix being a move to a higher floor rather than addressing the noise source. Thin walls and cheap construction appear structural, not fixable after move-in. Lease-end frustrations center on vague damage charges and the trash fee policy. One reviewer paid for carpet work after providing photos showing only normal wear; another resents a $25-per-bag surcharge despite overflowing bins. Staff communication on non-basic issues reads as dismissive in several accounts. The 3.7 rating reflects a genuine split: families and professionals who value staff attentiveness rate it highly; noise-sensitive residents or those with move-out disputes leave one stars.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Palos Verdes Townhomes

#192

55 low data

Palos Verdes Townhomes

3.8(20)✓ Google-verified

Residents who stay tend to remain for years, citing a quiet, pet-friendly community with spacious townhome layouts and efficient maintenance. Renee, the property manager, earns strong praise from long-term tenants for keeping standards high and enforcing rules fairly, though some prospects report feeling dismissed or judged during the application process, and office phone responsiveness has been flagged as inconsistent.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Crossroads at Arlington

#193

61

Crossroads at Arlington

3.6(257)✓ Google-verified

Lucy and Brittany, two leasing staff, stand out for their personal attention during move-in and early interactions, but resident experience deteriorates sharply once tenants occupy units. Maintenance requests routinely sit for weeks unresolved; reviewers report unaddressed leaks, pest infestations, broken doors and outlets, and appliance failures. The property's management has grown dismissive post-lease, with some residents describing rude or even contemptuous responses to serious complaints. Security cameras on the grounds are non-functional, and catalytic converter theft has struck repeatedly. The online resident portal and lease application process receive consistent praise for clarity and ease. However, the gap between professional leasing operations and poor post-move maintenance and responsiveness is stark. Multiple long-term tenants express regret and plan to leave; newer residents often rate the stay favorably, suggesting problems surface weeks to months into occupancy.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Everly Plaza

#194

61 low data

Everly Plaza

4.5(16)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews (2-4 years old) praise the quiet, clean setting and manager Tammy's welcoming approach. A one-star review from two months ago reports serious issues: bedbug infestation, trespassing, drug activity, theft of medication packages, and disruptive neighbors. The reviewer notes staff did little to address these problems.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Boulders (Hurst)

#195

61

Boulders (Hurst)

3.6(140)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and new arrivals consistently praise the staff warmth and maintenance responsiveness, with spacious units in a quiet, gated setting that feels secure. The dog park and pet amenities draw families, and parking is ample. However, pest control gaps leave gnats persistent, repairs involving ordered parts lag for months, and some tenants report confusing move-in fees, passive-aggressive office moments, and a policy-first culture when rent is late.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

HomeTowne At Matador Ranch

#196

61 low data

HomeTowne At Matador Ranch

4.0(69)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report good office service and a calm, safe setting. However, maintenance delays and unwanted children in a seniors-focused community undercut the experience for some. Security and emergency access issues also surface in complaints.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

#197

59

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

4.1(20)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the prime downtown location near parks and restaurants, clean units, and responsive named staff like Camryn and maintenance crew Willie and Ramon. The biggest tensions emerge around the no-elevator design (blocking accessibility for mobility-limited renters), inadequate parking, train noise, and serious billing disputes at move-out. The property works best for young professionals and dog owners who prioritize walkability over amenities and frills.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Dylan

#198

61

The Dylan

3.6(107)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Dylan delivers a modern, well-maintained community with responsive staff and a convenient location near shops and restaurants. Hidden costs pile up quickly: residents report base rents of $1,200-$1,600 plus $25-$125 monthly add-ons for parking, trash, and pets, and towing fees exceed $300 if you park without a reserved spot after 9 pm.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Sansom Bluff Apartments

#199

60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(198)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff offers spacious apartments with good amenities and standout maintenance and activities staff. However, the leasing office consistently fails to answer phones or provide welcoming service, and management shows dismissive attitudes once residents move in. The property itself appeals to pet owners and families, but office staff turnover has left frustrated residents who feel unwelcome when they need help.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Decker Apartment Homes

#200

58

Decker Apartment Homes

3.7(274)✓ Google-verified

Eight years in and fresh arrivals alike report the same core failures: calls and emails go unanswered, water shuts down without notice, and pest control stalls while damage spreads. The move-in team impresses, and maintenance responds quickly when they can, but systemic issues around communication, infrastructure (flooded parking lot, broken gates), and neighborhood safety consistently override that initial goodwill. Residents describe being nickeled and dimed for utilities they cannot reliably access, then abandoned by management once the lease term winds down.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Last updated 2026-08-23